流浪动物管理中的行政执法困境与优化路径研究
Research on the Operational Challenges and Optimization Paths of Administrative Law Enforcement in Stray Animal Management
DOI: 10.12677/ds.2025.118262, PDF,   
作者: 毛骏豪:华东交通大学人文社会科学学院,江西 南昌
关键词: 行政执法动物保护流浪动物Administrative Law Enforcement Animal Protection Stray Animal
摘要: 随着生活水平不断提高,养宠物的人群在全国不断扩大,很多国人将猫狗视作家庭成员,在情感上有很深的寄托。2020年,继新版《国家畜禽遗传资源目录》生效后,农业农村部明确将犬猫界定为伴侣动物,从而排除了它们作为畜禽的地位。然而近年来我国城市流浪猫狗数量激增,引发了公共安全、卫生、动物福利和伦理等多重社会治理危机。本文锚定行政执法新视角,以问题–成因–路径为逻辑主线,揭示执法乱象背后的职权配置缺陷与程序失范,从行政组织法、程序法维度解剖制度病灶,提出以专项立法为先导、数字治理为工具、协同治理为支撑的法治化方案,助推建设“人与动物和谐共生”的现代化治理体系。
Abstract: With the continuous improvement in living standards, the population of pet owners has been expanding nationwide, and many Chinese citizens regard cats and dogs as family members, forming deep emotional bonds with them. In 2020, following the enactment of the revised National Catalog of Animal Genetic Resources, the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs explicitly classified dogs and cats as companion animals, thereby excluding their status as livestock or poultry. However, in recent years, China has witnessed a surge in urban stray cats and dogs, triggering multifaceted societal crises concerning public safety, hygiene, animal welfare, and ethics. This paper anchors a novel perspective of administrative law enforcement, adopting a “Problem-Cause-Solution” logical framework. It exposes operational deficiencies in authority allocation and procedural irregularities behind chaotic enforcement practices. By dissecting institutional flaws through the lenses of administrative organizational law and procedural law, the study proposes a legal framework centered on: Specialized legislation as the cornerstone, Digital governance as the implementation tool, Collaborative governance as the sustainable support. This tripartite approach aims to advance the modernization of governance systems toward harmony between humans and animals.
文章引用:毛骏豪. 流浪动物管理中的行政执法困境与优化路径研究[J]. 争议解决, 2025, 11(8): 203-210. https://doi.org/10.12677/ds.2025.118262

参考文献

[1] 曹明德. 生态法的理论基础[J]. 法学研究, 2002, 24(5): 98-107.
[2] 孙江. 从“非人类中心主义”看动物权利的理论基础[J]. 河北法学, 2009, 27(4): 146-150.
[3] 余谋昌. 走出人类中心主义[J]. 自然辩证法研究, 1994, 10(7): 8-14+47.
[4] Susan, J.A. (1993) Environmental Ethics. Mc Graw-Hill, Inc.
[5] 冯子轩. 生态伦理视阈中的野生动物保护立法完善之道[J]. 行政法学研究, 2020(4): 67-82.
[6] 彭璞. 环境法律立法理念及内部伦理解构分析[J]. 世界经济与政治论坛, 2021(6): 127-143.
[7] 付琳. 法经济学视角下中国动物保护立法困境[J]. 学术探索, 2016(12): 78-86.
[8] 孙江. 动物法律地位探析[J]. 河北法学, 2008(10): 151-154.
[9] 徐昕. 论动物法律主体资格的确立——人类中心主义法理念及其消解[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2002, 18(1): 15-20.
[10] 何怀宏. 生态伦理[M]. 保定: 河北大学出版社, 2002.
[11] 班曼曼, 郑海红, 贾广敏. 浅议我国对流浪动物的管理[J]. 中国动物检疫, 2014, 31(10): 38-40.
[12] 郑沁. 美国流浪动物收容制度研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 华东政法大学, 2023.