直播电商消费心理耗损的经济效应与传统电商延迟价值韧性研究
Study on the Economic Effects of Consumer Psychological Depletion in Live-Streaming E-Commerce and the Resilience of Delayed Value in Traditional E-Commerce
DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2025.1482763, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 曹 颖:南京林业大学人文社会科学学院,江苏 南京
关键词: 直播电商心理耗损传统电商延迟价值Live-Streaming E-Commerce Psychological Depletion Traditional E-Commerce Delayed Value
摘要: 直播电商以即时互动与场景沉浸重构消费决策逻辑,其诱发的消费心理耗损表现为冲动消费后的认知失调、决策后悔及信任衰减,正外化为系统性经济效应,冲击电商交易效率、成本结构及市场秩序。传统电商依托“搜索、比价、延迟决策”模式形成的延迟价值韧性,在保障理性消费与供应链稳定中具有独特经济价值。本文以电商经济运行为框架,解析直播电商心理耗损向交易成本攀升、供需错配及用户价值缩水的传导机制,阐释传统电商延迟价值韧性的核心构成即理性决策效能、供应链协同能力、信任积淀及其支撑作用,通过构建“心理耗损与价值韧性”分析模型,揭示二者动态平衡规律。研究发现,直播电商短期红利与传统电商长期韧性存在协同空间,功能互补可降低系统风险并提升整体效率。本文为数字消费时代电商生态演化提供理论视角,亦为平台优化与政策制定提供学术依据。
Abstract: Live-streaming e-commerce has reshaped consumer decision-making logic through real-time interaction and situational immersion. The resulting consumer psychological depletion manifests as cognitive dissonance after impulsive consumption, decision regret, and eroding trust, which externalize into systemic economic effects—impacting e-commerce transaction efficiency, cost structures, and market order. Traditional e-commerce, anchored in the “search, price comparison, and delayed decision-making” model, has fostered resilience in delayed value, holding unique economic significance in safeguarding rational consumption and supply chain stability. This paper, framed within e-commerce economic operations, analyzes how psychological depletion in live-streaming e-commerce transmits to rising transaction costs, supply-demand mismatches, and diminishing user value. It also elaborates on the core components of traditional e-commerce’s delayed value resilience: rational decision-making efficacy, supply chain synergy, and trust accumulation, along with their supporting roles. By constructing an analytical model of “psychological depletion vs. value resilience,” it uncovers the laws governing their dynamic balance. The study reveals synergistic potential between live-streaming e-commerce’s short-term dividends and traditional e-commerce’s long-term resilience; functional complementarity can reduce systemic risks and enhance overall efficiency. This research offers a theoretical perspective on e-commerce ecosystem evolution in the digital consumption era, while providing academic grounding for platform optimization and policy formulation.
文章引用:曹颖. 直播电商消费心理耗损的经济效应与传统电商延迟价值韧性研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(8): 2184-2190. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.1482763

参考文献

[1] 姚静. 电商直播氛围对消费者冲动性购买意愿的影响——基于情绪传染视角[J]. 商业经济研究, 2025(9): 61-64.
[2] 孙立彬. 直播电商行业将迈入“强监管” [N]. 中国高新技术产业导报, 2025-06-23(017).
[3] 黎红艳. 扎根理论方法下电商直播消费者行为特征与企业营销策略探究[J]. 商业经济研究, 2024(22): 176-180.
[4] 郭全中, 刘文琦. 电商平台与短视频平台直播带货的比较研究[J]. 传媒, 2022(9): 49-52.
[5] 史小今, 李川, 刘希兰, 等. 网络直播电商对实体经济的影响研究[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2024(9): 175-181, 228.
[6] 洪晓棚. 直播电商情境下互动时长对消费者冲动购买意愿的影响研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 大连: 东北财经大学, 2024.
[7] 王雨晨, 郭瑞. 数字赋能背景下电商直播购买决策的影响因素元分析[J]. 上海市经济管理干部学院学报, 2025, 23(3): 13-27.
[8] 冯旭日, 许萌. 媒介化消费场域下消费者冲动购买行为的影响因素研究[J]. 新媒体研究, 2025, 11(10): 31-38.
[9] Lin, L. (2023) How Different Promotions and Consumer Trust Drive Impulse Buying Intention in the Live Streaming Context: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Global Economy, Business and Finance, 5, 152-156.
[10] 许景贤, 林蓓, 黄志锋. 直播电商中饥饿营销对消费者冲动购买行为的影响[J]. 科技和产业, 2024, 24(11): 101-108.
[11] Zakay, D. (2000) Gating or Switching? Gating Is a Better Model of Prospective Timing (a Response to ‘Switching or Gating?’ by Lejeune). Behavioural Processes, 50, 1-7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] 彭宁. 直播电商现状分析与问题的解决对策[J]. 北方经贸, 2023(8): 61-63.
[13] 蔡朝欣. 消费者在直播带货中冲动行为的影响因素探究[J]. 现代营销(经营版), 2021(13): 92-93.
[14] 奚凯悦, 鲍磊, 李雅谦. 直播带货中退货的成因、危害及其对策[J]. 时代经贸, 2024, 21(10): 137-140.
[15] 王亚楠. 直播电商产业价值共创的机制构建与行为实证[J]. 山西财经大学学报, 2024, 46(S2): 71-73.