游戏化电商中的强化机制对老年用户消费行为的影响
The Impact of Reinforcement Mechanisms in Gamified E-Commerce on the Consumer Behavior of Elderly Users
摘要: 随着电商平台的不断发展,游戏化机制在提升用户参与度和购买转化率方面发挥了重要作用。本文基于斯金纳强化学习理论,分析了拼多多的“砍一刀”机制如何通过奖励反馈循环强化老年消费者的参与行为。尽管老年消费者通常表现出较为保守和风险规避的消费行为,但游戏化设计通过“非直接购买”机制、社交互动和任务反馈等方式降低了他们对线上购物的警惕,并激发了他们的参与意愿。为了更深入理解老年群体的消费行为差异,本文还从数字素养和社交活跃度维度探讨了不同老年亚群体在参与活动时的行为模式和心理动机差异。最后,文章强调,尽管游戏化设计能提高了老年消费者的参与度,平台在设计此类机制时应更加关注心理健康和权益保护,确保老年消费者在享受购物乐趣的同时,能做出理性且健康的消费决策。
Abstract: As e-commerce platforms continue to develop, gamification mechanisms have played an important role in enhancing user engagement and conversion rates. This paper, based on Skinner’s reinforcement learning theory, analyzes how Pinduoduo’s “Slash the Price” mechanism strengthens elderly consumers’ participation behavior through a reward-feedback loop. Although elderly consumers typically exhibit more conservative and risk-averse purchasing behaviors, gamification design reduces their wariness of online shopping and stimulates their willingness to participate through “non-direct purchase” mechanisms, social interactions, and task feedback. To better understand the consumption behavior differences among elderly consumers, this paper explores the behavioral patterns and psychological motivation differences among different elderly subgroups in participation activities from dimensions such as digital literacy and social activity. Finally, the article concludes that while gamification boosts elderly engagement, platforms should prioritize psychological well-being and protect consumer rights, ensuring elderly consumers can make rational and healthy consumption decisions while enjoying the fun of shopping.
文章引用:唐薇. 游戏化电商中的强化机制对老年用户消费行为的影响[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(8): 2191-2196. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.1482764

参考文献

[1] 熊瑛. 电商平台游戏化营销对消费者持续购买意愿的影响研究——基于使用和满足理论的视角[J]. 商业经济研究, 2024(20): 71-74.
[2] 曾雅琴, 潘盛龙, 张帆. 老年人消费风险影响因素及其规避路径探究[J]. 河北农机, 2021(2): 108-109.
[3] Huotari, K. and Hamari, J. (2016) A Definition for Gamification: Anchoring Gamification in the Service Marketing Literature. Electronic Markets, 27, 21-31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Mou, Y., Ma, Y., Guo, D. and Ding, Z. (2024) Effect of Platform Gamification Rewards on User Stickiness. Management Decision, 63, 824-849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Zhang, Y., Xiao, S. and Zhou, G. (2020) User Continuance of a Green Behavior Mobile Application in China: An Empirical Study of Ant Forest. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, Article ID: 118497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Chen, Y. (2020) A Review of Risky Decision-Making in Older Adults. Advances in Psychology, 10, 1259-1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 汪晏亦, 侯玲. 浅析不同年龄段消费者行为特点及营销策略[J]. 广西质量监督导报, 2019(7): 183, 207.
[8] Lim, S., Tan, Y., Loh, X., Cham, T., Ooi, M. and Tan, G.W. (2025) It’s Not All Fun and Games: Gamification in E-Commerce on Consumers’ Impulse Buying of Retail Food Products. British Food Journal, 127, 1098-1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Hronek, L.M. and Kestner, K.M. (2025) A Human‐Operant Evaluation of Commission and Omission Errors during Differential Reinforcement of Other Behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 58, 401-421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Martínez, N., Rodríguez-Ferreiro, J., Barberia, I. and Matute, H. (2023) A Debiasing Intervention to Reduce the Causality Bias in Undergraduates: The Role of a Bias Induction Phase. Current Psychology, 42, 32456-32468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef