话语标记“就是说”“这/那就是说”功能差异分析
Analysis of Functional Differences between Discourse Markers Such as “Namely” and “This Means That/That Is to Say”
摘要: 在现代汉语中,言说类话语标记“就是说”“这就是说”“那就是说”的使用频率很高,本文拟通过语料考察对这三类话语标记进行描写分析,总结对比在两种功能(进一步阐释功能和推测推理功能)之中它们在主观性层面、客观性层面以及语体之间的异同,找出相应的规律。
Abstract: In modern Chinese, the use frequency of discourse markers such as “namely”, “This means that”, and “that is to say” is very high. This article intends to conduct a descriptive analysis of these three types of discourse markers through corpus examination, summarize and compare their similarities and differences in subjectivity, objectivity, and language style between the two functions (further elaboration function and inference function), and find corresponding rules.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
廖秋忠. 篇章中的管界问题[J]. 中国语文, 1992(4): 241-250.
|
|
[2]
|
方梅. 北京话句中语气词的功能研究[J]. 中国语文, 2000(2): 98-107.
|
|
[3]
|
李宗江. 话语标记“就是说”的来源及其多功能性[J]. 语文研究, 2009(1): 23-28.
|
|
[4]
|
沈家煊. 语言的“主观性”和“主观化” [J]. 外语教学与研究, 1999(4): 268-275.
|
|
[5]
|
袁毓林. 叙事语体中插入语的性质和功能[J]. 当代语言学, 2008(3): 193-204.
|
|
[6]
|
Langacker, R.W. (1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford University Press.
|