跨流域调水工程生态补偿策略的演化博弈分析
Evolutionary Game Analysis of Ecological Compensation Strategies for Inter-Basin Water Diversion Projects
摘要: 南水北调西线工程是构成我国国家水网“四横三纵”的重要组成部分,而西线调水对长江流域的生态发展势必产生一定的影响。为进一步研究生态补偿机制在西线工程中的作用,本文引入生态补偿机制和激励惩罚约束机制,构建流域管理者为博弈主体的两方演化博弈模型,并对演化博弈进行了数值模拟仿真分析,结果表明:1) 无论是激励手段还是惩罚手段,都会对演化博弈系统的稳定性产生影响。2) 博弈主体的策略选择结果与额外生态收益、付出成本等因素具有较强的相关性。该研究成果可为进一步开展南水北调西线工程的生态补偿机制研究提供技术参考与建议。
Abstract: The Western route of the South-to-North Water Diversion project constitutes a crucial component of China’s national water network, known as the “four horizontal and three vertical” system. The diversion of water from this route will inevitably have a significant impact on the ecological development of the Yangtze River basin. To further investigate the role of a payment for ecosystem services mechanism in the Western Route project, this paper introduces an ecological compensation mechanism along with incentive, punishment, and constraint mechanisms implemented. Additionally, it constructs a two-party evolutionary game model wherein managers. Numerical simulation and analysis are conducted to examine this evolutionary game. The results demonstrate that: 1) Both incentives and punishments influence stability within the evolutionary game system; 2) There is a strong correlation between strategy choices made by game players and additional ecological benefits and costs incurred. These research findings can serve as technical references and provide suggestions for further exploration into a payment for ecosystem services mechanism for the western route of South-to-North Water Diversion project.
文章引用:彭益, 李永, 张泽宇, 犹鸿森. 跨流域调水工程生态补偿策略的演化博弈分析[J]. 水资源研究, 2025, 14(4): 363-373. https://doi.org/10.12677/jwrr.2025.144039

参考文献

[1] 王玉莲, 杨泽凡, 闫龙, 等. 基于多方法综合比较的南水北调西线工程水源区生态需水研究[J]. 水资源保护, 2024, 40(4): 137-147.
[2] 于洪贤, 柴青宇, 李晓钰, 等. 基于生态补偿的穆棱河流域生态文明建设[J]. 水资源研究, 2018, 7(6): 623-629.
[3] 董翌, 刘志, 黄嘉伟. 跨省流域横向生态补偿法律机制的问题与思考[J]. 华北水利水电大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 40(5): 63-74.
[4] 马毅军, 李珂. 流域生态补偿研究综述[J]. 中国资源综合利用, 2021, 39(8): 108-111.
[5] 孙玉环, 张冬雪, 丁娇, 等. 跨流域调水核心水源地生态补偿标准研究——以丹江口库区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2022, 31(6): 1262-1271.
[6] 李继清, 薛智明, 谢开杰. 跨流域调水工程受水区生态补偿标准研究[J]. 水力发电, 2021, 47(1): 1-6+33.
[7] PENG, Z. Y., PU, H. R., HUANG, X., et al. Study on public willingness and incentive mechanism of ecological compensation for inter-basin water transfer in China in the carbon neutral perspective. Ecological Indicators, 2022, 143: 109397.[CrossRef
[8] 骆进仁, 韩前菊. 欠发达地区间跨流域调水工程生态补偿中区域博弈关系研究[J]. 兰州交通大学学报, 2022, 41(2): 143-148.
[9] 周申蓓, 李嘉欣, 张子霞. 跨流域调水三方合作博弈生态补偿研究——以南水北调中线工程为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2023, 32(11): 2371-2382.
[10] LU, Y. L., FAN, L. F. and ZHAI, L. Y. Evolutionary game analysis of inter-provincial diversified ecological compensation collaborative governance. Water Resources Management, 2022, 37(1): 341-357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 康艳青, 毛柯予, 朱永明. 成本分担下黄河流域跨省生态补偿利益均衡分析[J]. 人民黄河, 2023, 45(3): 79-84.
[12] 席猛, 张馨心, 安槿诺, 等. 基于三方演化博弈的黄河流域生态补偿合作治理研究[J]. 中国高新科技, 2023(20): 83-6.
[13] 刘林玲, 刘红琴, 谭丽峰. 基于多利益主体的调水工程生态补偿演化博弈分析[J]. 资源与产业, 2024, 26(1): 154-61.
[14] 卢泉, 刘雪雪, 刘亮, 等. 基于演化博弈的新疆博斯腾湖流域生态补偿机制研究[J]. 人民黄河, 2024, 46(3): 75-79.
[15] 胡玉文, 徐久成, 张倩倩. 决策演化集的李雅普诺夫稳定性[J]. 山东大学学报(理学版), 2023, 58(7): 52-59.
[16] 刘宜, 苏夏. 环境保护型政府性基金虚报冒领行为演化博弈分析——以废弃电器电子产品处理基金为例[J]. 四川环境, 2020, 39(1): 129-37.
[17] 袁宝招, 陆桂华, 李原园, 等. 水资源需求驱动因素分析[J]. 水科学进展, 2007(3): 404-409.