近五年心理资本研究的演进与趋势——基于Cite Space的可视化分析

Evolution and Trends of Psychological Capital Research in the Last Five Years—A Cite Space-Based Visualization Analysis

摘要: 本研究以“心理资本”为主题，通过中国知网(CNKI)和Web of Science核心合集数据库检索近五年(2020~2025年)的国内外文献，最终纳入2552篇中文文献和196篇英文文献。借助Cite Space软件进行可视化分析，结合文献计量学方法，探索心理资本领域的研究演进、热点主题及干预路径。结果发现：国内外研究呈现显著地域差异，中国以351篇发文量居全球首位，研究主题聚焦于职业群体(如护士、教师)心理资本、本土化量表开发及心理资本的中介效应分析，而国际研究更侧重理论模型构建(如A-HERO模型)与组织行为学视角的应用；关键词突现分析表明，国内研究前沿转向数字化转型、远程工作等新兴技术驱动的干预模式，而国际研究则关注人工智能与虚拟现实技术的融合。此外，国内机构合作网络松散，跨文化比较研究不足。未来需加强技术赋能的本土化干预设计、长期效果追踪及跨学科合作，以推动心理资本理论的创新与实践应用。

Abstract: In this study, we searched the domestic and international literature of the past five years (2020~2025) through the China Knowledge Network (CNKI) and Web of Science Core Collection database with the theme of “psychological capital”, a total of 2552 articles in Chinese and 196 articles in English were finally included. With the help of Cite Space software for visualization and analysis, combined with bibliometric methods, we explore the research evolution, hot topics and intervention pathways in the field of psychological capital. The results show that there are significant geographical differences between domestic and international studies, with China ranking first in the world with 351 articles, and the research topics focus on psychological capital of occupational groups (e.g. nurses, teachers), the development of localized scales and the analysis of the mediating effects of psychological capital. International research, on the other hand, focuses more on theoretical model building (e.g. the A-HERO model) and the application of organizational behavioral perspectives. Keyword emergence analyses show that the domestic research frontier is shifting towards emerging technology-driven intervention models such as digital transformation and teleworking, while international research is focusing on the convergence of artificial intelligence and virtual reality technologies. In addition, there is a loose network of cooperation among domestic institutions and insufficient cross-cultural comparative research. In the future, technology-enabled localized intervention design, long-term effect tracking and interdisciplinary collaboration need to be strengthened to promote the innovation and practical application of psychological capital theory.