自主研发穿刺带线针在小儿腹股沟疝腹腔镜治疗中的应用
The Application of a Self-Developed Puncture Suture Needle in the Laparoscopic Treatment of Pediatric Inguinal Hernia
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2025.1582434, PDF,   
作者: 段恒宇*, 李瑞斌#:内蒙古科技大学包头医学院第一附属医院日间手术中心,内蒙古 包头
关键词: 腹股沟疝儿童腹腔镜高位结扎Inguinal Hernia Children Laparoscopy High Ligation
摘要: 目的:探讨自主研发穿刺带线针在单孔腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术治疗小儿腹股沟疝中的临床应用价值,包括手术效率、术后恢复及安全性。方法:本研究回顾性分析了2022年1月至2023年5月期间,在内蒙古科技大学包头医学院第一附属医院接受治疗的232例小儿腹股沟疝患者的临床数据。根据手术所用器械不同,将患者分为开放手术组、腔镜手术组及腔镜自研组(采用自研穿刺带线针)。收集并分析手术时间、术后疼痛评分、手术并发症、复发率等关键指标。结果:三组患者基线特征相似,无显著差异。腹腔镜探查中发现了28例对侧鞘状突未闭(contralateral patent processus vaginalis, CPPV),发生率为19%。在手术效率方面,开放手术组与两腔镜组(包括腔镜手术组和腔镜自研组)进行对比,单侧手术时间存在差异(31.32 ± 3.35 min vs. 8.20 ± 1.13 min vs. 8.47 ± 1.12 min, P < 0.01, F = 2180.7),双侧手术时间存在差异(48.13 ± 2.24 min vs. 15.47 ± 1.00 min vs. 14.91 ± 1.43, P < 0.01, F = 1430.1),术中出血量存在差异[4.60 (3.90~5.30) ml vs. 0.68 (0.56~0.86) ml vs. 0.58 (0.52~0.75) ml, P < 0.01, H = 159.7],住院时间存在差异[4.9 (3.8~6.0) day vs. 1.9 (1.5~2.3) day vs. 1.2 (1.0~1.4) day, P < 0.01, H = 157.9],住院费用存在差异[6398.3 (5666.7~6987.3) yuan vs. 7654.9 (6587.9~8606.7) yuan vs. 6503.0 (5439.5~7484.6) yuan, P < 0.01, H = 26.9],疤痕长度存在差异[1.52 (1.24~1.65) ml vs. 0.50 (0.36~0.62) ml vs. 0.52 (0.35~0.57) ml, P < 0.01, H = 156.7]。并且三组术后疼痛程度存在显著差异。三组在手术并发症的评估方面,开放手术组术后发现4例异时疝,其余2组未发现异时疝,三组存在显著差异(P < 0.05, χ2 = 7.039),开放手术组术后早期发现0例阴囊肿胀,腔镜手术组为5例,腔镜自研组为4例,存在差异(P < 0.05, χ2 = 8.561)。其他并发症发生率无统计学意义。结论:自研穿刺带线针在费用及住院时间方面更具优势,为小儿腹股沟疝的微创治疗提供了新的、更为经济高效的选择,具有广阔的临床应用前景和推广价值。
Abstract: Objective: To investigate the clinical value of a self-developed puncture suture needle in single-port laparoscopic high ligation of the hernia sac for pediatric inguinal hernia, focusing on surgical efficiency, postoperative recovery, and safety. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed clinical data from 232 pediatric inguinal hernia patients treated at The First Affiliated Hospital of Baotou Medical College, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, between January 2022 and May 2023. Patients were divided into three groups based on surgical instruments: open surgery group, conventional laparoscopic group, and the laparoscopic self-developed group (using the self-developed puncture suture needle). Key metrics, including operative time, postoperative pain scores, surgical complications, and recurrence rates, were collected and analyzed. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar across groups with no significant differences. Laparoscopy identified 28 cases of contralateral patent processus vaginalis (CPPV), an incidence of 19%. Regarding surgical efficiency, significant differences existed between the open surgery group and the two laparoscopic groups (conventional and self-developed): unilateral operative time (31.32 ± 3.35 min vs. 8.20 ± 1.13 min vs. 8.47 ± 1.12 min, P < 0.01, F = 2180.7), bilateral operative time (48.13 ± 2.24 min vs. 15.47 ± 1.00 min vs. 14.91 ± 1.43 min, P < 0.01, F = 1430.1), intraoperative blood loss [median (IQR): 4.60 (3.90~5.30) ml vs. 0.68 (0.56~0.86) ml vs. 0.58 (0.52~0.75) ml, P < 0.01, H = 159.7], hospital stay [median (IQR): 4.9 (3.8~6.0) days vs. 1.9 (1.5~2.3) days vs. 1.2 (1.0~1.4) days, P < 0.01, H = 157.9], hospitalization cost [median (IQR): 6398.3 (5666.7~6987.3) yuan vs. 7654.9 (6587.9~8606.7) yuan vs. 6503.0 (5439.5~7484.6) yuan, P < 0.01, H = 26.9], and scar length [median (IQR): 1.52 (1.24~1.65) cm vs. 0.50 (0.36~0.62) cm vs. 0.52 (0.35~0.57) cm, P < 0.01, H = 156.7]. Postoperative pain levels also differed significantly among the three groups. Complication assessment revealed significant differences: the open group had 4 cases of metachronous hernia while none in the other two groups (P < 0.05, χ2 = 7.039), and early postoperative scrotal swelling occurred in 0 cases in the open surgery group, 5 cases in the conventional laparoscopic group, and 4 cases in the laparoscopic self-developed group, showing significant differences (P < 0.05, χ2 = 8.561). Other complication rates showed no statistical significance. Conclusion: The self-developed puncture suture needle has advantages in terms of cost and hospital stay. It provides a new, more economical and efficient option for minimally invasive treatment of pediatric inguinal hernia, and has broad clinical application prospects and promotion value.
文章引用:段恒宇, 李瑞斌. 自主研发穿刺带线针在小儿腹股沟疝腹腔镜治疗中的应用[J]. 临床医学进展, 2025, 15(8): 1844-1854. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2025.1582434

参考文献

[1] Kokorowski, P.J., Wang, H.-S., Routh, J.C., Hubert, K.C. and Nelson, C.P. (2013) Evaluation of the Contralateral Inguinal Ring in Clinically Unilateral Inguinal Hernia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Hernia, 18, 311-324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Patkowski, D., Czernik, J., Chrzan, R., Jaworski, W. and Apoznański, W. (2006) Percutaneous Internal Ring Suturing: A Simple Minimally Invasive Technique for Inguinal Hernia Repair in Children. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 16, 513-517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Shaughnessy, M.P., Maassel, N.L., Yung, N., Solomon, D.G. and Cowles, R.A. (2021) Laparoscopy Is Increasingly Used for Pediatric Inguinal Hernia Repair. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 56, 2016-2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Chen, P., Li, S., Yu, L., Jin, S., Su, J., Yang, Z., et al. (2022) Single-Port Laparoscopic Percutaneous Extraperitoneal Internal Ring Closure for Paediatric Inguinal Hernia Using a Needle Grasper. Pediatric Surgery International, 38, 1421-1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Zhou, J., Chen, X. and Jiang, T. (2019) Pediatric Inguinal Hernia Treated by Single-Port Laparoscopic Water Injection Hernia Crochet Needle. Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques, 15, 239-244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] 刘林, 李索林, 李萌, 李英超, 等. 疝钩针改进及其在单孔腹腔镜经皮腹膜外内环结扎术中的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(5): 337-341.
[7] Morgado, M. and Holland, A.J. (2024) Inguinal Hernias in Children: Update on Management Guidelines. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 60, 648-653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Khan, F.A., Jancelewicz, T., Kieran, K., Islam, S., Eichenwald, E., Guillory, C., et al. (2023) Assessment and Management of Inguinal Hernias in Children. Pediatrics, 152, e2023062510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Kara, Y.A., Yağız, B., Balcı, Ö., Karaman, A., Özgüner, İ.F. and Karaman, İ. (2021) Comparison of Open Repair and Laparoscopic Percutaneous Internal Ring Suturing Method in Repairing Inguinal Hernia in Children. Cureus, 13, e14262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Wang, K.S., Papile, L., Baley, J.E., Benitz, W., Cummings, J., Carlo, W.A., et al. (2012) Assessment and Management of Inguinal Hernia in Infants. Pediatrics, 130, 768-773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] 杜莹, 向可可. 传统手术和单孔腹腔镜疝气针治疗小儿腹股沟斜疝的临床效果比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(6): 664-666.
[12] 段建平, 朱林春, 李志刚, 等. 单孔腹腔镜联合ERAS策略在小儿腹股沟斜疝中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(5): 578-580.
[13] Wolak, P.K., Strzelecka, A., Piotrowska, A., Dąbrowska, K., Wolak, P.P., Piotrowska, I., et al. (2021) The Operative Time for Unilateral Inguinal Hernia Repair in Children Performed with Percutaneous Internal Ring Suturing (PIRS) or Open Approach Method. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10, Article No. 1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Zhang, S., Cai, D., Jin, Y., Luo, W., Chen, Q., Fan, X., et al. (2025) Exploration of Laparoscopic Day Surgery Mode for Pediatric Inguinal Hernia: A Large Cohort Study. Updates in Surgery, 77, 575-582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] 张怀孝, 王建国, 赵红军. 日间手术单孔腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术与开放修补术治疗小儿腹股沟疝的临床效果分析[J]. 中国社区医师, 2023, 39(7): 74-76.
[16] Lam, C.S., Dhedli, P.K., Russell, S., Stedman, F.E. and Hall, N.J. (2022) Cost-Effectiveness of Laparoscopic and Open Pediatric Inguinal Hernia Repair. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 32, 805-810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] He, C.S., Su, Y., Liu, M.X., Qin, Y.B., Ji, Y.H., Huang, W.Q., et al. (2024) Causes of Recurrence of Paediatric Inguinal Hernia after Single-Port Laparoscopic Closure. Pediatric Surgery International, 40, Article No. 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Song, W.H.C., Golam, A., Golding, H., Poznikoff, A., Krishnan, P. and Baird, R. (2023) A Comparison of Operative and Anesthetic Techniques for Inguinal Hernia Repair in Infants. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 58, 994-999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Takehara, H., Yakabe, S. and Kameoka, K. (2006) Laparoscopic Percutaneous Extraperitoneal Closure for Inguinal Hernia in Children: Clinical Outcome of 972 Repairs Done in 3 Pediatric Surgical Institutions. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 41, 1999-2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]