《外国国家豁免法》中商业活动例外问题研究
Research on the Issue of Commercial Activity Exception in the Foreign State Immunity Act
DOI: 10.12677/ds.2025.118268, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 陈 胜, 贺 妍:燕山大学文法学院,河北 秦皇岛
关键词: 《外国国家豁免法》限制豁免商业活动Foreign State Immunity Act Restrictive Immunity Commercial Activity
摘要: 商业活动是限制豁免主义的核心概念,商业活动例外是国家豁免立法中最常被援引的条款,也是国家豁免领域最复杂的问题之一。《中华人民共和国外国国家豁免法》(下称外国国家豁免法)第七条规定了商业活动例外规则。仅从立法层面看,援引商业活动例外条款需满足以下四点,其一主体符合外国国家概念,其二被诉行为被认为是商业活动,其三商业活动与诉讼具有实际联系,其四商业活动与法院地国家具有领土联系。就具体适用而言,《外国国家豁免法》中商业活动例外规则并不十分明确,在实际适用中,对商业活动的判断标准、援引条件规定、与其他法律衔接问题等方面可能会出现种种问题,因此需要在商业活动判断标准上坚持性质为首,把握其中是否存在公权力;援引时应把握立法中的价值取向,审慎适用;协调法律衔接;尽快出台司法解释和指导案例的方式明确商业活动例外规则的适用,以期《外国国家豁免法》发挥出真正的价值。
Abstract: Commercial activities constitute a core concept within the doctrine of restrictive immunity, and the commercial activity exception stands as one of the most frequently invoked provisions in national immunity legislation, as well as one of the most complex issues in this field. Article 7 of the Foreign State Immunity Law of the Peoples Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the Foreign State Immunity Act) establishes the commercial activity exception rule. From a legislative perspective, invoking this exception requires meeting four criteria: (1) the subject falls within the definition of a foreign state; (2) the alleged conduct qualifies as a commercial activity; (3) the commercial activity bears a substantial connection to the litigation; and (4) the commercial activity has a territorial link to the forum state. In practical application, however, the commercial activity exception under the FSIL remains inadequately defined. Challenges may arise in areas such as determining the immunity of state-owned enterprises, establishing criteria for identifying commercial activities, interpreting invocation conditions, and harmonizing interactions with other legal frameworks. In practical application, the commercial activity exception under the Foreign State Immunity Act lacks sufficient clarity. Issues are likely to arise concerning the criteria for characterizing commercial activities, the conditions for invoking the exception, and its coordination with other legal regimes. Consequently, it is necessary to: adhere to a nature-based test as the primary criterion for determining commercial activities, focusing on whether public authority is exercised; ensure that any invocation of the exception is consistent with the underlying values of the legislation and applied prudently; enhance legal coherence across relevant statutes; and promptly issue judicial interpretations and guiding cases to clarify the application of the commercial activity exception. These steps are essential to realizing the true purpose and value of the Foreign State Immunity Act.
文章引用:陈胜, 贺妍. 《外国国家豁免法》中商业活动例外问题研究[J]. 争议解决, 2025, 11(8): 250-259. https://doi.org/10.12677/ds.2025.118268

参考文献

[1] 黄进. 国家及其财产豁免问题研究[M]. 北京: 北京中国政法大学出版社, 1987: 172-173.
[2] McCaffrey, S. and Schreuer, C.H. (1991) State Immunity: Some Recent Developments. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 39, 213-221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] (1993) The Discretionary Function Exception under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act: When in America, Do the Romans Do as the Romans Wish? Columbia Law Review, 93, 744.
[4] 李颖. 国家豁免例外研究[M]. 北京: 知识产权出版社, 2014: 76-81.
[5] 王佳. 对外关系法中的国家豁免问题研究[J]. 武大国际法评论, 2023, 7(4): 49-62.
[6] 陆寰. 国家豁免中的商业例外问题研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 武汉: 武汉大学, 2012.
[7] 张连举, 袁茜. 国家管辖豁免的转向——以“一带一路”工程商业争端为视角[J]. 政法学刊, 2019, 36(3): 33-39.
[8] 宋晓. 论限制豁免论中国家商业行为的判断标准[J]. 国际经济法论丛, 2002, 6(2): 227-241.
[9] Hafner, G. and Köhler, U. (2005) The United Nations Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of States and Their Property. Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, 35, 3-49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 张建栋. 论国家管辖豁免中的商业活动例外[C]//《上海法学研究》集刊2021年第13卷 总第61卷——上海市法学会欧盟法、“一带一路”法律、国际法研究会文集. 上海: 华东政法大学, 2022: 21-31.
[11] 张超汉, 刘静. 美国国家主权豁免商业例外条款研究[J]. 中国国际私法与比较法年刊, 2020, 26(1): 331-339.
[12] 贾桂德. 当前国际法形势和我国外交条法工作[J]. 国际法学刊, 2022(3): 1-16, 153.
[13] 何志鹏, 都青. 法治中国视野下的国家豁免问题——从日本、韩国比较法角度的探究[J]. 甘肃政法学院学报, 2017(2): 34-44.
[14] 李庆明. 《民事诉讼法》第305条与《外国国家豁免法》第16条的关系研究[J]. 国际法学刊, 2025(1): 23-33.
[15] 終審法院. 剛果民主共和國及其他人訴FG Hemisphere Associates LLC[J]. 基本法簡訊, 2012, 12(14): 12-18.
[16] 全国人民代表大会常务委员会法制工作委员会负责人就外国国家豁免法答记者问[J]. 中华人民共和国全国人民代表大会常务委员会公报, 2023(6): 630-634.
[17] 车丕照, 何志鹏. 国家豁免法的域外解决与实践建议[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2024: 256-266.
[18] 刘芳, 周嘉晖. 商业例外条款的国家实践及启示——兼评中国《外国国家豁免法》第7条[J]. 海关与经贸研究, 2024, 45(5): 88-104.
[19] 王佳. 国家豁免立法的商业活动例外研究[J]. 国际法研究, 2025(1): 22-36.