数字空间理论下大数据证据审查的制度构建
Institutional Construction of Big Data Evidence Review under Digital Space Theory
摘要: 大数据证据在司法实践中面临数据基础可靠性存疑、算法黑箱等阻碍实质审查、分析结论与案件要素关联性认定困难等审查困境。“数字空间理论”将大数据证据解构为四个相互依赖的层级。构建适配的审查制度需要在程序层面,强化技术辅助体系、推动有限算法透明度规则、探索区块链存证技术应用,提升法庭审查能力;在实体规则层面,设定证明责任转移规则,将算法披露程度作为评价证据证明力的核心因素,促使大数据证据提出主体履行说明义务。
Abstract: Big data evidence faces challenges in judicial practice, including doubts about the reliability of the data foundation, algorithmic black boxes that hinder substantive review, and difficulties in determining the relevance of analytical conclusions to case elements. The “digital space theory” deconstructs big data evidence into four interdependent layers. To establish an appropriate review system, it is necessary to strengthen technical support systems, promote limited algorithm transparency rules, and explore the application of blockchain evidence storage technology at the procedural level to enhance court review capabilities. At the substantive rule level, rules for shifting the burden of proof should be established, with the degree of algorithm disclosure serving as a core factor in evaluating the probative value of evidence, thereby compelling the parties presenting big data evidence to fulfil their duty to explain.
文章引用:周奕帆. 数字空间理论下大数据证据审查的制度构建[J]. 交叉科学快报, 2025, 9(5): 669-675. https://doi.org/10.12677/isl.2025.95083

参考文献

[1] 刘品新. 论大数据证据[J]. 环球法律评论, 2019, 41(1): 21-34.
[2] 林喜芬. 大数据证据在刑事司法中的运用初探[J]. 法学论坛, 2021, 36(3): 27-36.
[3] 杨继文, 范彦英. 大数据证据的事实认定原理[J]. 浙江社会科学, 2021(10): 46-54, 156-157.
[4] 郑飞, 马国洋. 大数据证据适用的三重困境及出路[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 28(3): 207-218.
[5] 郑飞. 数字证据及其阶梯式分类审查机制[J]. 法学研究, 2024, 46(5): 169-186.
[6] 洪涛. 大数据证据真实性审查规则的建构[J]. 苏州大学学报(法学版), 2024, 11(1): 69-82.
[7] 卫晨曙. 论刑事审判中大数据证据的审查[J]. 安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 46(2): 77-86.
[8] 熊晓彪. 生成式人工智能证据认定的困境与规范进路[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), 2025, 43(1): 72-93.
[9] 丰叶. 刑事大数据证据的证据化路径研究[J]. 大连理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 45(5): 93-101.