融合注意力机制与图神经网络的电商虚假评论识别研究
Research on the Identification of False Reviews in E-Commerce by Integrating Attention Mechanism and Graph Neural Network
摘要: 针对现有图神经网络模型在电商虚假评论识别任务中对关键信息聚集不足的问题,本文通过对CARE-GNN模型引入节点基于点积的注意力聚合,提出一种融合注意力机制的Att-CARE-GNN改进模型。相较于原始模型,本文所改进的模型能够在聚合阶段为目标节点的邻居节点动态赋予聚合权重,从而优化特征选择过程,进而增强模型对电商等虚假评论的识别效果。本文基于YelpChi以及Amazon数据集进行实验,对比CARE-GNN等现有基准模型,结果表明,Att-CARE-GNN在F1值、准确率上表现优异,在YelpChi数据集上F1值与准确率分别提升1.7%、4.9%以上,在Amazon数据集上,F1值与准确率分别提升0.3%、1.1%以上,验证了注意力机制在抑制噪声干扰、提升关键特征权重分配方面的有效性。本文为电商平台的虚假评论识别提供了更具鲁棒性和可解释性的解决方案。
Abstract: Aiming at the problem of insufficient aggregation of key information in the task of identifying false reviews in e-commerce by the existing graph neural network models, this paper introduces node attention aggregation based on dot product to the CARE-GNN model and proposes an improved Att-CARE-GNN model integrating the attention mechanism. Compared with the original model, the improved model proposed in the paper can dynamically assign aggregation weights to the neighbor nodes of the target node in the aggregation stage, thereby optimizing the feature selection process and further enhancing the model’s recognition effect on false reviews in e-commerce and other fields. This paper conducts experiments based on the YelpChi and Amazon datasets and compares existing benchmark models such as CARE-GNN. The results show that Att-CARE-GNN performs excellently in F1 value and accuracy. On the YelpChi dataset, the F1 value and accuracy increase by more than 1.7% and 4.9% respectively. On the Amazon dataset, the F1 value and accuracy rate have increased by more than 0.3% and 1.1% respectively, verifying the effectiveness of the attention mechanism in suppressing noise interference and improving the distribution of key feature weights. This article provides a more robust and interpretable solution for identifying false reviews on e-commerce platforms.
文章引用:王静, 肖创. 融合注意力机制与图神经网络的电商虚假评论识别研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(9): 319-329. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.1492916

参考文献

[1] Jindal, N. and Liu, B. (2008) Opinion Spam and Analysis. Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Search and Web Data Mining, Palo Alto, 11-12 February 2008, 219-230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Li, J., Ott, M., Cardie, C. and Hovy, E. (2014) Towards a General Rule for Identifying Deceptive Opinion Spam. Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Volume 1, 1566-1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Hajek, P., Barushka, A. and Munk, M. (2020) Fake Consumer Review Detection Using Deep Neural Networks Integrating Word Embeddings and Emotion Mining. Neural Computing and Applications, 32, 17259-17274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] 曾致远, 卢晓勇, 徐盛剑, 等. 基于多层注意力机制深度学习模型的虚假评论检测[J]. 计算机应用与软件, 2020, 37(5): 177-182.
[5] 曹东伟, 李邵梅, 陈鸿昶. 基于GCN的虚假评论检测方法[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2022, 58(3): 181-186.
[6] Yao, L., Mao, C. and Luo, Y. (2019) Graph Convolutional Networks for Text Classification. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 33, 7370-7377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Wang, G., Xie, S., Liu, B. and Yu, P.S. (2011) Review Graph Based Online Store Review Spammer Detection. 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Data Mining, Vancouver, 11-14 December 2011, 1242-1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Dou, Y., Liu, Z., Sun, L., Deng, Y., Peng, H. and Yu, P.S. (2020). Enhancing Graph Neural Network-Based Fraud Detectors against Camouflaged Fraudsters. Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, 19-23 October 2020, 315-324.[CrossRef
[9] Song, C., Teng, Y., Zhu, Y., Wei, S. and Wu, B. (2022) Dynamic Graph Neural Network for Fake News Detection. Neurocomputing, 505, 362-374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 袁紫烟, 任勋益, 黄家铭. 一种改进图神经网络的虚假评论检测方法[J]. 软件导刊, 2024, 23(3): 27-33.
[11] 张蓉, 张献国. 基于层次异构图注意力网络的虚假评论检测[J]. 计算机应用, 2021, 41(5): 1275-1281.
[12] Shang, C., Liu, Q., Chen, K.S., et al. (2018) Edge Attention-Based Multi-Relational Graph Convolutional Networks.
[13] 颜梦香, 姬东鸿, 任亚峰. 基于层次注意力机制神经网络模型的虚假评论识别[J]. 计算机应用, 2019, 39(7): 1925-1930.