认罪认罚案件中的量刑建议精准化研究
Study on Precision in Sentencing Recommendations for Leniency for Guilty Pleas Cases
摘要: 2018年,我国对《刑事诉讼法》作出修订,此次修订以立法形式正式确立了认罪认罚从宽制度,同时,首次提出“量刑建议精准化”这一概念。量刑建议是指检察机关基于检察权向法院提出的量刑主张。在我国认罪认罚案件中,检察机关应当提出量刑建议,法院在作出判决时“一般应当采纳”检察院的量刑建议。量刑建议经历了由幅度刑向确定刑的发展历程,在这背后涉及控辩双方对案件的博弈,也关系到法检对于量刑权力的分配,本文将结合相关制度实践进行探讨。
Abstract: In 2018, China revised the Criminal Procedure Law, formally establishing the system of leniency for guilty pleas through legislation. This revision also introduced the concept of “precision in sentencing recommendations” for the first time. Sentencing recommendations refer to the sentencing proposals made by the procuratorate to the court based on its prosecutorial authority. In cases involving guilty pleas in China, the procuratorate should make sentencing recommendations, and the court “generally should adopt” the procuratorate’s sentencing recommendations when rendering a judgment. Sentencing recommendations have evolved from discretionary sentencing to fixed sentencing. This evolution reflects the strategic interactions between prosecution and defense in cases and also relates to the allocation of sentencing authority between the judiciary and the prosecution. This article will explore these issues in conjunction with relevant institutional practices.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
李奋飞. 认罪认罚量刑建议精准化的检视与改良[J]. 中国应用法学, 2023(3): 74-85.
|
|
[2]
|
庄乾龙. 论认罪认罚从宽制度中精准化量刑建议[J]. 政法学刊, 2020, 37(3): 79-87.
|
|
[3]
|
陈国庆. 刑事诉讼法修改与刑事检察工作的新发展[J]. 国家检察官学院学报2019, 27(1): 16-39.
|
|
[4]
|
刘林强. 认罪认罚从宽制度下的精准量刑[J]. 检察风云, 2023(10): 52-53.
|
|
[5]
|
陈明辉. 认罪认罚从宽制度中法检权力的冲突与协调[J]. 法学, 2021(11): 57-69.
|
|
[6]
|
余剑. 精准化量刑建议的法律性质及其展开[J]. 东方法学, 2023(4): 178-189.
|
|
[7]
|
梅传强, 梁选点. 认罪认罚案件量刑建议精准化改革的反思与完善[J]. 重庆社会科学, 2022(7): 98-111.
|
|
[8]
|
陈国庆. 量刑建议的若干问题[J]. 中国刑事法杂志, 2019(5): 3-18.
|