行政复议变更决定的适用困境与完善路径
The Application Dilemma and Improvement Path of Administrative Reconsideration Change Decisions
摘要: 新修订的《行政复议法》虽对行政复议变更决定进行了完善,规定了三种适用情形并明确禁止不利变更,但实践中仍存在诸多问题。本文通过对相关法律条文和实际案例的深入分析,指出变更决定在适用中存在适用范围界定模糊、与撤销决定关系不明、禁止不利变更规则不完善以及缺乏明确的适用程序等困境。为解决这些问题,应明确变更决定的适用范围,清晰区分不同情形下的适用条件;理清变更决定与撤销决定的关系,确立变更决定优先适用的原则;完善禁止不利变更规则,明确不利变更的判断标准及例外情形;构建明确的适用程序,规范调查取证、听取意见、作出决定等环节,以提高行政复议变更决定的适用效果,充分发挥行政复议化解行政争议的主渠道作用。
Abstract: Although the newly revised Administrative Reconsideration Law has improved administrative reconsideration change decision, stipulating three applicable situations and explicitly prohibiting adverse changes, there are still many problems in practice. Through an in-depth analysis of relevant legal provisions and practical cases, this paper points out that there are difficulties in the application of change decisions, such as vague definition of the scope of application, unclear relationship with revocation decisions, imperfect rules prohibiting adverse changes, and lack of clear application procedures. In order to solve these problems, the scope of application of the change decision should be clarified, and the applicable conditions under different circumstances should be clearly distinguished; the relationship between the change decision and the revocation decision should be clarified, and the principle of priority application of the change decision should be established; the rules prohibiting adverse changes should be improved, and the judgment criteria and exceptions for adverse changes should be clarified; clear application procedures should be established, investigation and evidence collection, listening to opinions, making decisions, and other links should be standardized, so as to improve the application effect of administrative reconsideration change decisions and give full play to the role of administrative reconsideration as the main channel for resolving administrative disputes.
文章引用:王丽. 行政复议变更决定的适用困境与完善路径[J]. 争议解决, 2025, 11(9): 29-35. https://doi.org/10.12677/ds.2025.119275

参考文献

[1] 黄学贤. 新《行政复议法》中的变更决定及其完善[J]. 法学评论, 2024, 42(1): 143-149.
[2] 章志远. 行政复议化解行政争议主渠道作用的实现进路[J]. 暨南学报(哲学社会科学版), 2025(7): 1-13.
[3] 江必新. 中华人民共和国行政复议法条文解读与法律适用[M]. 北京: 中国法制出版社, 2023: 190, 146.
[4] 章剑生. 行政复议变更决定: 定位、适用与限定——《行政复议法》第63条评释[J]. 现代法学, 2025, 47(2): 142-157.
[5] 成协中, 李晨. 论行政复议中禁止不利变更条款的准确适用[J]. 杭州师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 46(6): 118-128.
[6] 庄汉, 姚昕彤. 论行政复议中禁止不利益变更原则的适用[J]. 湖北警官学院学报, 2024, 37(4): 125-133.
[7] 章志远, 陈劲竹. 行政复议变更决定的规范解释[J]. 学习与探索, 2025(2): 65-76+175.
[8] 郑宗强, 熊勇先. 论行政复议变更决定的优先适用[J]. 南海法学, 2024, 8(5): 56-67.
[9] 吴卫东. 行政复议变更决定运用的现实挑战及应对策略[J]. 行政与法, 2025(4): 1-3.