基于文献计量学的失语症康复现状分析

Analysis of the Current Situation of Aphasia Rehabilitation Based on Bibliometrics

摘要: 目的：梳理近十年失语症康复领域的研究现状与发展趋势，识别研究范式演变与技术路径变革，旨在为未来研究提供理论依据与实践导向。方法：检索2015年至2025年中国知网与Web of Science核心合集数据库中失语症康复的相关文献，运用CiteSpace 6.1.R6对年发文量、合作网络、关键词共现与突现等进行文献计量学与可视化分析。结果：共纳入文献3081篇(中文1480篇，英文1601篇)。英文研究形成多中心、多学科国际协作，中文研究多集中于中医药高校，合作相对局限。关键词聚类显示研究热点主要集中于：物理因子干预的多样化应用；中西医结合疗效机制探索；评估体系的智能化与生态化发展。关键词突现分析显示，中文研究中“早期康复”在特定阶段受到高度关注，而英文研究中“ischemic stroke (缺血性卒中)”与“intensity (强度)”展现出较高的突现强度，反映其在研究热点中的持续影响力。结论：失语症康复研究呈智能化、生态化、跨学科融合趋势。中西方研究在理论与技术上具有互补性。建议在未来研究中，推动建立中西方合作框架，借助神经影像技术共同验证中医康复疗法(如针灸)的神经机制，同时探索基于人工智能的多中心康复干预模式，以提升干预的精准性与普适性。

Abstract: Objective: To review the current research status and development trends in the field of aphasia rehabilitation over the past decade, identify the evolution of research paradigms and technological paths, and aim to provide theoretical basis and practical guidance for future research. Method: Relevant literature on aphasia rehabilitation from 2015 to 2025 in the CNKI and Web of Science core collection databases was retrieved. CiteSpace 6.1.R6 was used to conduct bibliometric and visual analysis of annual publication volume, collaboration network, keyword co-occurrence and emergence. Result: A total of 3081 articles were included (1480 in Chinese and 1601 in English). English studies formed multi-center, multi-disciplinary international collaboration, while Chinese studies mainly focused on universities with traditional Chinese medicine, and the cooperation was relatively limited. Keyword clustering showed that the research hotspots mainly concentrated on: diversified application of physical factor intervention; exploration of the efficacy mechanism of integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine; intelligent and ecological development of assessment system. Emergence word analysis showed that “digital therapy”, “family-community integrated rehabilitation”, and “deepening of evidence-based practice” were frontier directions. Conclusion: Aphasia rehabilitation research shows a trend of intelligence, ecology, and cross-disciplinary integration. Chinese and Western studies exhibit theoretical and technological complementarity. Future studies are encouraged to establish collaborative frameworks between Chinese and Western researchers, utilizing neuroimaging techniques to jointly explore the neural mechanisms of traditional Chinese rehabilitation therapies (such as acupuncture), and to develop AI-based, multi-center rehabilitation intervention models that enhance both precision and generalizability.