剪切波弹性成像、超声微血管成像技术及子宫动脉多普勒超声血流成像在子痫前期孕晚期孕妇中的应用价值
The Application Value of Shear Wave Elastography, Ultrasound Microvascular Imaging Technology and Uterine Artery Doppler Ultrasound Blood Flow Imaging in Pregnant Women with Preeclampsia in the Third Trimester
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2025.1592476, PDF,   
作者: 韩美君:青岛大学附属医院超声科,山东 青岛;日照市人民医院超声科,山东 日照;杨宗利:青岛大学附属医院超声科,山东 青岛
关键词: 超声微血管成像技术胎盘剪切波弹性成像子宫动脉血流子痫前期应用价值Ultrasound Microvascular Imaging Technology Shear Wave Elastography of the Placenta Uterine Artery Blood Flow Preeclampsia Application Value
摘要: 目的:探讨胎盘剪切波弹性成像、超声微血管成像技术及子宫动脉多普勒超声血流成像在子痫前期孕晚期孕妇中的应用价值。方法:回顾性选取2023年1月至2025年1月我院产检并住院分娩的180例孕晚期妊娠妇女(子痫前期组80例,正常组100例),使用剪切波弹性成像(SWE)测量两组孕妇前壁胎盘弹性值;采用频谱多普勒检测子宫动脉血流动力学参数(RI, S/D, PI),并同步进行微血管成像(VFI)评估胎盘灌注情况,记录两组孕妇脐动脉血流(S/D)、搏动指数(PI)、阻力指数(RI)以及胎盘血管化指数(VI),依据妊娠结局差异,将子痫前期(PE)孕妇划分为:不良结局组(n = 25)与良好结局组(n = 55),Logistic回归分析各参数与胎儿不良结局的关系。绘制ROC曲线,分析各指标对PE组孕妇不良妊娠结局的预测价值。结果:PE组孕妇胎盘弹性、脐动脉血流、子宫动脉各血流参数均高于正常组,胎盘血管化指数(VI)低于正常组(P < 0.05)。PE组中不良组胎盘弹性、脐动脉血流S/D、PI、RI,以及子宫动脉阻力指标(S/D, PI, RI)异常升高,同时伴随微血管灌注量(VI)下降,组间差异具有临床显著性(P < 0.05),Logistic回归分析显示,胎盘平均弹性、脐血流PI,子宫动脉S/D、RI、胎盘VI值都为导致子痫前期晚孕期孕妇不良结局的主要因素。ROC曲线分析结果显示,胎盘平均弹性,脐动脉血流PI,胎盘血管化指数VI,子宫动脉S/D、RI预测不良妊娠结局的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.780、0.670、0.771、0.621、0.760 (P < 0.05)。结论:在孕晚期子痫前期患者中,通过胎盘弹性联合超声微血管成像技术监测血流相关参数,结合子宫动脉的各项血流参数变化对妊娠结局预测具有重要的临床参考价值。
Abstract: Objective: To explore the application value of placental shear wave elastography, ultrasound microvascular imaging technology and uterine artery Doppler ultrasound blood flow imaging in pregnant women with preeclampsia in the third trimester. Method: A retrospective selection was made of 180 pregnant women in the third trimester who underwent prenatal examinations and delivered in our hospital from January 2023 to January 2025 (80 cases in the preeclampsia group and 100 cases in the normal group). Shear wave elastography (SWE) was used to measure the placental elasticity values of the anterior wall in the two groups of pregnant women. The hemodynamic parameters of uterine arteries (RI, S/D, PI) were detected by spectral Doppler, and microvascular imaging (VFI) was simultaneously performed to evaluate placental perfusion. The umbilical artery blood flow (S/D), pulsatility index (PI), resistance index (RI), and placental vascularization index (VI) of the two groups of pregnant women were recorded. According to the differences in pregnancy outcomes, pregnant women with preeclampsia (PE) were divided into the poor outcome group (n = 25) and the good outcome group (n = 55), Logistic regression analysis was conducted to explore the relationship between each parameter and adverse fetal outcomes. The ROC curve was plotted. The predictive value of each index for adverse pregnancy outcomes is analyzed in pregnant women of the PE group. Results: The placental elasticity, umbilical artery blood flow, placental vascularization index (VI), and various blood flow parameters of the uterine artery in the PE group of pregnant women were all higher than those in the normal group (P < 0.05). In the PE group, the placental elasticity, umbilical artery blood flow S/D, PI and RI, and uterine artery S/D, PI and RI in the poor group were all higher than those in the control group, and VI was lower than that in the control group. The differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). In the PE group, the placental elasticity, umbilical artery blood flow S/D, PI, RI, as well as uterine artery S/D, PI, and RI were significantly higher than those in the control group, while the VI was lower than that in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis indicated that the average elasticity of the placenta, umbilical blood flow PI, uterine artery S/D, RI, and placental VI values were all the main factors leading to adverse outcomes in late pregnancy for preeclamptic pregnant women. The results of ROC curve analysis showed that the areas under the curve (AUC) for predicting adverse pregnancy outcomes by the average elasticity of the placenta, umbilical artery blood flow PI, placental vascularization index VI, uterine artery S/D, and RI were 0.780, 0.670, 0.771, 0.621 and 0.760 respectively (P < 0.05). Conclusion: In patients with preeclampsia in the third trimester of pregnancy, monitoring blood flow-related parameters through placental elasticity combined with ultrasound microvascular imaging technology, and combining the changes in various blood flow parameters of the uterine artery to predict pregnancy outcomes has important clinical reference value.
文章引用:韩美君, 杨宗利. 剪切波弹性成像、超声微血管成像技术及子宫动脉多普勒超声血流成像在子痫前期孕晚期孕妇中的应用价值[J]. 临床医学进展, 2025, 15(9): 207-214. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2025.1592476

参考文献

[1] 李战娜. 低分子肝素钙联合拉贝洛尔对重度子痫前期患者血管内皮功能及妊娠结局的影响[J]. 临床医学, 2021, 41(11): 108-110.
[2] Angadi, C., Singh, P., Shrivastava, Y., Priyadarshi, M., Chaurasia, S., Chaturvedi, J., et al. (2023) Effects of Umbilical Cord Milking versus Delayed Cord Clamping on Systemic Blood Flow in Intrauterine Growth-Restricted Neonates: A Randomized Controlled Trial. European Journal of Pediatrics, 182, 4185-4194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] 肖燕璇, 张立力, 黎嘉琪, 等. 单胎子痫前期孕妇产前体质量指数与母婴结局关系探讨[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2023, 39(18): 2357-2361.
[4] 谭杰, 姚玮, 孙翔. 三维能量多普勒超声在妊娠期子痫患者胎盘功能评估中的应用[J]. 中国优生与遗传杂志, 2020, 28(11): 1353-1355.
[5] 姜瑜, 刘艳, 杨丹, 等. 超微血流成像技术在评估妊娠期高血压疾病胎盘灌注中的应用价值分析[J]. 解放军医学院学报, 2022, 43(6): 634-638+699.
[6] 中华医学会妇产科学分会妊娠期高血压疾病学组. 妊娠期高血压疾病诊治指南(2020) [J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2020, 55(4): 227-238.
[7] Jouannic, J.M., Blondiaux, E., Senat, M.V., Friszer, S., Adamsbaum, C., Rousseau, J., et al. (2020) Prognostic Value of Diffusion‐Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Brain in Fetal Growth Restriction: Results of Prospective Multicenter Study. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 56, 893-900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Emeruwa, U.N., Gyamfi-Bannerman, C. and Laurent, L.C. (2023) Biomarkers and the Risk of Preeclampsia. Journal of the American Medical Association, 329, 539-541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Jung, E., Romero, R., Yeo, L., Gomez-Lopez, N., Chaemsaithong, P., Jaovisidha, A., et al. (2022) The Etiology of Preeclampsia. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 226, S844-S866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] 刘丽. 胎儿生长受限孕妇胎盘血流状态指标的变化及临床意义[J]. 山东医药, 2021, 61(13): 81-83.
[11] Grani, G., Sponziello, M., Pecce, V., Ramundo, V. and Durante, C. (2020) Contemporary Thyroid Nodule Evaluation and Management. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 105, 2869-2883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Lei, S.Y., Zheng, R.S., Zhang, S.W., et al. (2021) Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Women in China: Temporal Trends and Projections to 2030. Cancer Biology and Medicine, 18, 900-909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Ciardullo, S., Monti, T. and Perseghin, G. (2020) High Prevalence of Advanced Liver Fibrosis Assessed by Transient Elastography among U.S. Adults with Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care, 44, 519-525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] 李建敏, 李娜, 郭娟, 等. 彩超联合血清HIF-1α检测对妊娠期高血压疾病患者胎儿宫内窘迫的诊断价值[J]. 中国医师杂志, 2020, 22(6): 932-934.
[15] 姚彩云, 刘会琴, 张海荣. 胎盘弹性平均值与脐带动脉S/D对胎儿预后不良的预测及其相关性分析[J]. 贵州医药, 2020, 44(3): 432-434.
[16] 褚翠雯, 陈爱萍, 李坤. 超声子宫动脉血流指标评估子痫前期孕妇母胎循环及与妊娠结局的相关性[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志, 2022, 30(7): 1569-1573.