人工智能冠状动脉钙化积分自动测量方法的临床有效性评估研究进展
Research Progress on Clinical Effectiveness Evaluation of Automatic Measurement Method for Artificial Intelligence Coronary Artery Calcium Score
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2025.1592479, PDF,   
作者: 陈雨桐, 罗银灯*:重庆医科大学附属第二医院放射科,重庆
关键词: AI冠状动脉钙化测量方法AI Coronary Artery Calcification Measurement Method
摘要: 本课题的研究首先阐述了AI技术通过深度学习框架突破传统测量局限的核心突破,包括基于三维卷积神经网络的多任务学习模型实现钙化斑块精准分割与积分同步计算,以及能谱CT虚拟平扫技术消除额外辐射暴露的创新优势,显著提升大规模筛查效率与临床可及性。通过构建多维度评估体系,验证了AI模型在钙化积分量化、微小病灶检测及心血管事件预测中的高可靠性,尤其强调其在风险分层一致性、人工替代效能及动态监测能力方面的临床潜力。研究进一步从技术适配性、生理复杂性及交互作用三方面系统剖析挑战:技术层面聚焦设备协议差异、重建算法选择及模型泛化能力对测量稳定性的影响;生理维度深入钙化病理特征、患者个体差异及代谢交互作用对算法决策的潜在干扰;交互作用机制则揭示扫描参数、生理节律及多模态数据融合对结果优化的协同效应。最终提出动态阈值补偿、多模态特征融合及联邦学习优化等策略,构建了从技术研发到临床转化的全链条改进框架,为推动AI-CACS技术向精准心血管管理工具的演进提供方法学指导。
Abstract: This research first elaborates on the core breakthroughs of AI technology in breaking through traditional measurement limitations through deep learning frameworks, including the implementation of accurate segmentation and synchronous calculation of calcium scores of calcified plaques by a multi-task learning model based on a three-dimensional convolutional neural network, as well as the innovative advantage of spectral CT virtual non-contrast technology in eliminating additional radiation exposure, which significantly improves the efficiency of large-scale screening and clinical accessibility. By constructing a multi-dimensional evaluation system, the high reliability of the AI model in calcium score quantification, detection of small lesions, and prediction of cardiovascular events is verified, with particular emphasis on its clinical potential in terms of risk stratification consistency, manual replacement efficacy, and dynamic monitoring capability. The study further systematically analyzes the challenges from three aspects: technical adaptability, physiological complexity, and interaction mechanisms. At the technical level, it focuses on the impact of device protocol differences, reconstruction algorithm selection, and model generalization ability on measurement stability. In the physiological dimension, it delves into the potential interference of calcification pathological characteristics, individual patient differences, and metabolic interactions on algorithmic decision-making. The interaction mechanism reveals the synergistic effect of scanning parameters, physiological rhythms, and multimodal data fusion on result optimization. Finally, strategies such as dynamic threshold compensation, multimodal feature fusion, and federated learning optimization are proposed, and a full-chain improvement framework from technical research and development to clinical translation is constructed, providing methodological guidance for promoting the evolution of AI-CACS technology into a precise cardiovascular management tool.
文章引用:陈雨桐, 罗银灯. 人工智能冠状动脉钙化积分自动测量方法的临床有效性评估研究进展[J]. 临床医学进展, 2025, 15(9): 229-234. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2025.1592479

参考文献

[1] Kyriakoulis, I., Kumar, S.S., Lianos, G.D., Schizas, D. and Kokkinidis, D.G. (2025) Coronary Computed Angiography and Coronary Artery Calcium Score for Preoperative Cardiovascular Risk Stratification in Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery. Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease, 12, Article 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] 沈环, 张冰. 飞秒时间分辨的光电子谱对苯S2态的超快动力学研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2015, 31(9): 1662-1666.
[3] Peters, M., Aromiwura, A., Sagheer, U., Bhandari, S., Kalra, D., Sztukowska, M., et al. (2024) ASCVD Risk Stratification in a Large Urban Clinic—Role of CACS in Reclassifying Black versus White Individuals Seen for Preventive Care. Journal of Clinical Lipidology, 18, e512-e513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Rodrigues, T.S., Koshy, A., Gow, P., et al. (2023) Atherosclerosis on CT Coronary Angiography and Risk of Long-Term Cardiovasc Ular Events Post Liver Transplantation. Liver Transplantation: Official Publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society.
[5] Van Der Bijl, N., Joemai, R.M.S., Geleijns, J., et al. (2021) Deep Learning for Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Academic Radiology, 28, 1391-1401.
[6] Ouyang, Y., Li, F., Li, X., Bynum, J., Mor, V. and Taljaard, M. (2024) Estimates of Intra-Cluster Correlation Coefficients from 2018 USA Medicare Data to Inform the Design of Cluster Randomized Trials in Alzheimer’s and Related Dementias. Trials, 25, Article No. 732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Dutta, P., Bose, S., Roy, S.K. and Mitra, S. (2025) Are Vision-xLSTM-Embedded U-Nets Better at Segmenting Medical Images? Neural Networks, 192, Article 107925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Woo, J., Hong, S., Kang, D. and An, D. (2024) Improving the Quality of Experience of Video Streaming through a Buffer-Based Adaptive Bitrate Algorithm and Gated Recurrent Unit-Based Network Bandwidth Prediction. Applied Sciences, 14, Article 10490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Ma, G.M., Dou, Y.Q., Dang, S., et al. (2025) Effect of Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V Algorithm and Deep Learning Image Reconstruction Algorithm on Image Quality and Emphysema Quantification in COPD Patients under Ultra-Low-Dose Conditions. British Journal of Radiology, 98, 535-543.
[10] Toia, G.V., Garret, J.W., Rose, S.D., Szczykutowicz, T.P. and Pickhardt, P.J. (2025) Comparing Fully Automated AI Body Composition Biomarkers at Differing Virtual Monoenergetic Levels Using Dual-Energy CT. Abdominal Radiology, 50, 2758-2769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Lee, M.H., Liu, D., Garrett, J.W., Perez, A., Zea, R., Summers, R.M., et al. (2024) Comparing Fully Automated AI Body Composition Measures Derived from Thin and Thick Slice CT Image Data. Abdominal Radiology, 49, 985-996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Arora, N., Ramesh, V., Virnig, B.A., Blaes, A.H. and Gupta, A. (2022) Medications to Manage Cancer-Associated Anorexia/Cachexia Syndrome (CACS) in Patients with Advanced Gastrointestinal (GI) Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 40, 658-658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Lessmann, N., van Ginneken, B., Zreik, M., et al. (2021) Deep Learning for Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring: Towards Improved Generalization across CT Scanner Types and Image Protocols. European Radiology, 31, 9228-9237.
[14] He, W., Li, H., Chen, X., et al. (2023) Metal Artifact Reduction in Dual-Energy Computed Tomography for Cardiac Pacemakers and Prosthetic Valves: A Phantom Study. Current Problems in Cardiology, 48, 101693.
[15] Uyar, D.S., Karslıoğlu, H., Ocak, M. and Çelik, H.H. (2025) Evaluation of Hard Tissue Characteristics and Calcifications in Pulp Tissue of Hypomineralized Permanent Molars Using Micro-Computed Tomography. Archives of Oral Biology, 169, Article 106111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Pan, A., Shen, X. and Qiu, Q. (2025) Computed Tomography Manifestations and Pathological Features of Intra-Abdominal Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumor. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 41, 753-757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Li, M., Wang, H., Wang, J., Zhou, H. and Li, D. (2024) Gated or Ungated? A Case Study on Walkability Measurement for Urban Communities. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 17, 1017-1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Hellmuuth, S., Schlett, C.L., Nikolaou, K., et al. (2023) Diurnal Variation in Coronary Artery Calcification for Contrast-Enhanced Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography. Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, 17, 248-254.
[19] Markus, M.R.P., Till, I., Joany, M.C., et al. (2025) LDL-Cholesterol, Lipoprotein(a) and High-Sensitivity Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, Lipoprotein(a) and High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein are Independent Predictors of Cardiovascular Events. European Heart Journal, 5, ehaf281.
[20] Zhang, L., Wang, Q., Chen, R., et al. (2025) FedGCN: A Federated Graph Convolutional Network with 2-Hop Neighbor Recon-Struction for Multi-Center Medical Imaging Analysis. Medical Image Analysis, 92, Article 103112.