基于人机隐私共有的多维度个体隐私保护和多主体隐私保护机制研究
Research on Multi-Dimensional Individual Privacy Protection and Multi-Subject Privacy Protection Mechanisms Based on Human Computer Privacy Shared
DOI: 10.12677/ass.2025.149777, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 陈 思*, 于亚坤:重庆工商大学工商管理学院,重庆
关键词: 隐私保护多主体影响因素Privacy Protection Multi-Subject Influencing Factors
摘要: 在智能算法时代,企业通过自动化数据采集与算法推荐服务为用户带来便利的同时,也引发了用户对个体隐私保护的担忧。本研究基于扎根理论,通过对10名被访者的深度访谈,探究了人机交互视角下用户隐私保护行为的影响因素、多维度个体隐私保护及多主体隐私保护机制。研究发现,用户隐私保护行为主要受数据来源特征、平台因素、推荐内容相关性以及用户感知的影响,并表现为信息隐藏、痕迹清除等隐私保护行为。研究构建了多主体协同的隐私保护模型,提出平台应优化隐私设置、政府需加强监管、用户需提升隐私素养,以实现算法服务与隐私保护的平衡,为构建健康的数字生态提供理论参考与实践启示。
Abstract: In the era of intelligent algorithms, while enterprises bring convenience to users through automated data collection and algorithm recommendation services, it also raises concerns among users about individual privacy protection. This study is based on grounded theory and explores the influencing factors of privacy protection behavior, multidimensional individual privacy protection, and multi-agent privacy protection mechanisms from the perspective of human-computer interaction through in-depth interviews with 10 respondents. Research has found that user privacy protection behavior is mainly influenced by Data Source Characteristics, Platform Factors, Relevance of Recommended Content, and User Perception, and is manifested as protective behaviors such as Information Hiding and Trace Removal. A multi-agent collaborative privacy protection model has been developed, proposing that platforms should optimize privacy settings, governments need to strengthen supervision, and users need to improve their privacy literacy to achieve a balance between algorithm services and privacy protection, providing theoretical reference and practical inspiration for building a healthy digital ecosystem.
文章引用:陈思, 于亚坤. 基于人机隐私共有的多维度个体隐私保护和多主体隐私保护机制研究[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2025, 14(9): 58-66. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2025.149777

参考文献

[1] 朱侯, 方清燕. 社会化媒体用户隐私计算量化模型构建及隐私悖论均衡解验证[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(7): 111-125.
[2] 李鹏翔, 武阳. 模糊的边界: 算法传播中隐私边界的内涵、衍变及其规制[J]. 新闻与写作, 2022(1): 22-29.
[3] Tang, J., Zhang, B. and Akram, U. (2021) What Drives Authorization in Mobile Applications? A Perspective of Privacy Boundary Management. Information, 12, Article 311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Zhu, Y. and Kanjanamekanant, K. (2021) No Trespassing: Exploring Privacy Boundaries in Personalized Advertisement and Its Effects on Ad Attitude and Purchase Intentions on Social Media. Information & Management, 58, Article ID: 103314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Zhu, Y., Kanjanamekanant, K. and Chiu, Y. (2023) Reconciling the Personalization-Privacy Paradox: Exploring Privacy Boundaries in Online Personalized Advertising. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 24, 294-316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 方师师. 算法: 智能传播的技术文化演进与思想范式转型[J]. 新闻与写作, 2021(9): 12-20.
[7] 沈国麟. 全球平台传播: 分发、把关和规制[J]. 现代传播(中国传媒大学学报), 2021, 43(1): 7-12.
[8] 张舸, 李沐杰. “网红”的后数字复制逻辑: 概念网络、标准化空间生产与算法治理[J]. 全球传媒学刊, 2021, 8(5): 42-55.
[9] Xie, X., Du, Y. and Bai, Q. (2022) Why Do People Resist Algorithms? From the Perspective of Short Video Usage Motivations. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 941640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] 安孟瑶, 彭兰. 智能传播研究的当下焦点与未来拓展[J]. 全球传媒学刊, 2022, 9(1): 41-58.
[11] 姜火文, 熊广. 社交网络中隐私关注的保护性行为效应研究概述[J]. 新闻研究导刊, 2021, 12(16): 60-62.
[12] 刘百灵, 李洁. 技术特征与个体差异双重视角下用户信息隐私行为的影响机理研究[J]. 现代情报, 2023, 43(4): 137-149, 164.
[13] 陈昊, 张嵩, 吕途. 智能系统用户隐私意识与隐私保护意愿研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2022, 45(2): 168-175.
[14] 林碧烽, 范五三. 从媒介本位到用户至上: 智媒时代隐私素养研究综述[J]. 编辑学刊, 2021(1): 36-42.
[15] 臧国全, 董文馨. 隐私无助的形成机理研究——以社交网络新浪微博为例[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2022, 45(9): 110-118.
[16] 刘思晴, 刘国巍. 隐私保护自我效能对App用户隐私安全保护行为的影响研究[J]. 桂林航天工业学院学报, 2022, 27(2): 211-220.
[17] 张大伟, 谢兴政. 隐私顾虑与隐私倦怠的二元互动: 数字原住民隐私保护意向实证研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2021, 44(7): 101-110.
[18] 田力. 互联网平台隐私政策信息共享条款完善策略[J]. 管理现代化, 2021, 41(6): 69-71.
[19] 姜宁, 顾锋. 非授权信息使用与信息脆弱性、转换行为的关系研究——隐私保护措施的调节作用[J]. 科技管理研究, 2021, 41(1): 160-165.
[20] 张奕翔. 算法时代的隐私保护: 矛盾困境、路径方向及未来挑战[J]. 传媒论坛, 2022, 5(16): 4-10.
[21] Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L. and Strutzel, E. (1968) The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research. Nursing Research, 17, 364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] 陆泽宇, 查先进, 严亚兰. 社交媒体环境下智能推荐内容点赞行为影响机理研究[J]. 现代情报, 2023, 43(2): 42-55.
[23] Chen, C. (2024) How Consumers Respond to Service Failures Caused by Algorithmic Mistakes: The Role of Algorithmic Interpretability. Journal of Business Research, 176, Article ID: 114610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] 廖觅燕, 方佳明, 杨晶晶, 等. 应对行为视角下算法推荐内容相似性对App持续使用的影响[J]. 南开管理评论, 2023, 26(3): 178-190.
[25] Duffy, B.E. and Chan, N.K. (2018) “You Never Really Know Who’s Looking”: Imagined Surveillance across Social Media Platforms. New Media & Society, 21, 119-138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] Oz, M. and Yanik, A. (2022) Fear of Surveillance: Examining Turkish Social Media Users’ Perception of Surveillance and Willingness to Express Opinions on Social Media. Mediterranean Politics, 29, 1-25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[27] 段秋婷, 张大伟, 陈彦馨. “精于算计”: 社交媒体用户隐私保护脱离形成机制探讨[J]. 图书管理杂志, 2024, 43(2): 109-121.