基于霍夫斯泰德的文化维度理论的《功夫熊猫》与《哪吒之魔童降世》中西文化差异比较研究
A Comparative Study of Chinese-Western Cultural Differences in Kung Fu Panda and Ne Zha Based on Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions Theory
摘要: 在全球化语境下,动画电影成为文化传播与价值观输出的重要载体。本研究以霍夫斯泰德文化维度理论为分析框架,对《功夫熊猫》与《哪吒之魔童降世》两部动画电影展开对比研究,剖析其背后所蕴含的中西文化差异。研究发现,在个人主义与集体主义维度上,《功夫熊猫》通过阿宝的个人奋斗彰显自我价值,而《哪吒之魔童降世》则借哪吒与家庭、社会的和解凸显集体责任;权力距离层面,前者呈现相对平等的师徒关系,后者则体现传统父权与权威的影响力;在不确定性规避方面,二者分别展现出对命运的开放态度与抗争妥协并存的复杂观念。两部作品以独特的叙事策略诠释文化基因,既折射出中西文化在价值观念、叙事逻辑上的深层分歧,也揭示了全球化背景下文化转译与融合的多元可能,为跨文化传播研究提供了鲜活的影视文本范例。
Abstract: In the context of globalization, animated films have become important vehicles for cultural dissemination and value transmission. Using Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions Theory as an analytical framework, this study compares the animated films Kung Fu Panda and Ne Zha to analyze the underlying Chinese and Western cultural differences. The research finds that in the dimension of individualism versus collectivism, Kung Fu Panda highlights self-realization through the protagonist Po’s personal struggles, while Ne Zha emphasizes collective responsibility through Ne Zha’s reconciliation with family and society. In terms of power distance, the former presents relatively egalitarian mentor-apprentice relationships, whereas the latter reflects the influence of traditional patriarchy and authority. Regarding uncertainty avoidance, the two films respectively demonstrate an open attitude toward destiny and a complex coexistence of resistance and compromise toward fate. Through unique narrative strategies, both works interpret cultural genes, reflecting profound differences in values and narrative logic between Chinese and Western cultures, while also revealing the diverse possibilities of cultural translation and integration in the era of globalization. This provides a vivid cinematic case study for cross-cultural communication research.
文章引用:王晓蓓. 基于霍夫斯泰德的文化维度理论的《功夫熊猫》与《哪吒之魔童降世》中西文化差异比较研究[J]. 新闻传播科学, 2025, 13(9): 1621-1625. https://doi.org/10.12677/jc.2025.139230

参考文献

[1] Hofstede, G. (1980) Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Sage Publications.
[2] Christie, P.M.J., Kwon, I.G., Stoeberl, P.A. and Baumhart, R. (2003) A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Ethical Attitudes of Business Managers: India Korea and the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 46, 263-287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Merkin, R.S. (2006) Uncertainty Avoidance and Facework: A Test of the Hofstede Model. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30, 213-228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Lam, D. (2007) Cultural Influence on Proneness to Brand Loyalty. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 19, 7-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Huang, S. and Crotts, J. (2019) Relationships between Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions and Tourist Satisfaction: A Cross-Country Cross-Sample Examination. Tourism Management, 72, 232-241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 苏航. 文化维度理论视域下的中俄跨文化交际[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长春: 长春工业大学, 2017.
[7] 林鑫. 基于霍夫斯泰德文化维度框架的中美网络征婚广告对比研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 西北大学, 2018.
[8] 王欣芳. 霍夫斯泰德跨文化传播理论研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 石家庄: 河北经贸大学, 2019.
[9] 蒋晓萍, 张嘉洛. 对霍夫斯泰德儒家物力论的新反思[J]. 长沙大学学报, 2020(6): 68-74.
[10] 康建秋, 禹娜. 霍夫斯泰德文化维度理论视角下的中国式教育观——基于《中国式家长》游戏的分析[J]. 教育与教学研究, 2021(11): 38-51.
[11] 孟雨蒙. 电视选秀节目的跨文化差异研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 广州: 暨南大学, 2014.
[12] 岳尹妮. 文化维度视角下的中美文化差异研究——以《家有儿女》及《摩登家庭》为例[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2020.
[13] 葛晓平, 殷俊. 中国传统文化在当代国产动画电影设计中的应用研究——以《哪吒之魔童降世》为例[J]. 设计, 2023, 8(4): 4221-4229.
[14] 吉尔特·霍夫斯泰德, 格特·扬·霍夫斯泰德, 迈克尔·明科夫. 文化与组织: 心理软件的力量[M]. 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2019.