“兰精灵”破茧:自我认同理论下困境儿童成长关爱机制构建与实践——基于长虹社区三位一体干预的行动研究
Lan-Spirit Metamorphosis: Constructing and Implementing a Growth Support Mechanism for Disadvantaged Children under Self-Identity Theory—Action Research Based on the Trinity Intervention Model in Changhong Community
摘要: 在自我认同理论指导下,以长虹社区为试点,开展为期三个月的社区困境儿童自我认同能力提升行动。采用问卷法、访谈法、资料查阅法三大方法对34名困境儿童进行需求调研,通过循证干预和家校政社联动两大方法,运用个案辅导﹑小组辅导和社区三种方式,开展“画出兰精灵”﹑“兰精灵之家”和“秀出兰精灵”等行动,改变以往补充性直接物质捐赠模式,从儿童成长发展性视角出发,以“五社联动”为载体,建立“兰精灵”成长关爱机制,从个人﹑家庭﹑社会三个方面来提升困境儿童自我认识能力﹑增加困境儿童家庭亲子互动关系以及改善社会对困境儿童消极刻板印象,整体上来提升困境儿童自我认同能力。
Abstract: Guided by self-identity theory, a three-month community-based initiative was implemented in Changhong Community to enhance self-identity among children in distress. Needs assessment was conducted via questionnaires, interviews, and document analysis involving 34 children. Utilizing evidence-based interventions and home-school-government-community collaboration, the project employed casework, group work, and community activities (including “Drawing Lan Spirits,” “Lan Spirit Home,” and “Showcasing Lan Spirits”). Departing from traditional supplementary material aid, this developmental approach established the “Lan Spirit” care mechanism through Five-Society Linkage. The intervention targeted three dimensions: enhancing individual self-awareness, improving family parent-child interactions, and mitigating societal negative stereotypes, thus collectively strengthening the children’s self-identity.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
埃里克森(1998). 同一性: 青少年与危机(孙名之, 译). 浙江教育出版社.
|
|
[2]
|
郭金山, 车文博(2004). 大学生自我同一性状态与人格特征的相关研究. 心理发展与教育, 20(2), 51-55.
|
|
[3]
|
金河岩, 朴华英(2009). 家庭功能与初中生自我同一性的关系研究. 心理科学, 32(4), 1020-1022.
|
|
[4]
|
李娜(2017). 初中生自我评价、反射性评价、他人评价和主观幸福感的关系及辅导研究. 硕士学位论文, 武汉: 华中师范大学.
|
|
[5]
|
彭瑞然(2017). 初中生人际关系、人格特质与自我概念的关系研究. 硕士学位论文, 杭州: 杭州师范大学.
|
|
[6]
|
尚晓援(2015). 困境儿童成长研究: 社会排斥对孤儿自我认同形成的负面影响. 中国民政, (19), 14-18.
|
|
[7]
|
史铁尔, 胡彬, 钟涛(2017). 个案工作与小组工作(pp. 213-214). 北京师范大学出版集团.
|
|
[8]
|
唐莉(2016). 高中生自我同一性、领悟社会支持与心理幸福感的关系研究. 硕士学位论文, 湘潭: 湖南科技大学.
|
|
[9]
|
张明皓(2017). 留守儿童的日常焦虑与自我认同——基于结构二重性视角的考察. 北京社会科学, (3), 75-83.
|