网络环境下侵犯著作权罪主观要件废除研究
Study on the Abolition of the Subjective Elements of the Crime of Infringing Copyright in the Network Environment
摘要: 网络环境下,现行著作权刑法保护制度在主观要件方面面临两大难题:间接营利难以认定、非营利性侵权治理失灵。对于“以营利为目的”要件的去留,“废除论”学者的观点最符合网络侵权特点、顺应时代发展趋势。著作权刑事规制的现代化转型需实现二重突破:废除“以营利为目的”,消解主观要件带来的证明困境;确立“短期自由刑 + 惩罚性罚金刑 + 行业资格刑”的复合刑罚结构,构建责任形态多元化、轻缓化的刑法规制体系。
Abstract: In the network environment, the current criminal protection system for copyright faces two major difficulties in terms of subjective elements: the difficulty in identifying indirect profit-making and the failure in governing non-profit infringement. Regarding the retention or abolition of the element of “for the purpose of profit”, the viewpoint of scholars advocating the “abolition theory” is most in line with the characteristics of network infringement and conforms to the development trend of The Times. The modernization transformation of criminal regulation of copyright needs to achieve two breakthroughs: abolishing the “for the purpose of profit” to eliminate the proof dilemma caused by subjective elements; establishing a composite penalty structure of “short-term imprisonment + punitive fine + industry disqualification” to build a criminal regulation system with diversified and lenient liability forms.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
鲁力, 潘永涓. 论侵犯计算机软件著作权犯罪中的“以营利为目的” [J]. 湖南社会科学, 2010(6): 215-218.
|
|
[2]
|
马勇, 梁木生. 再论侵犯著作权罪中营利目的要件的存废改——基于实践整体性的视角[J]. 中国出版, 2017(13): 52-55.
|
|
[3]
|
王敏敏. 论网络著作权的刑法保护[J]. 中州学刊, 2014(6): 57-61.
|
|
[4]
|
高荣林. 论侵犯著作权罪“以营利为目的”的哲学依据[J]. 湖北警官学院学报, 2009, 22(1): 36-38.
|
|
[5]
|
莫洪宪, 胡骞. 技术变革背景下从数据价值保护迈向数据版权保护——以侵犯著作权罪的构成要件补足为进路[J]. 出版广角, 2018(15): 6-9.
|
|
[6]
|
程莹, 孟文玲. 网络文化背景下著作权刑法保护的困境与出路——基于近10年著作权犯罪相关案件的实证分析[J]. 理论导刊, 2018(11): 88-93.
|
|
[7]
|
刘叶. 网络著作权刑法保护的完善设计[J]. 上海政法学院学报(法治论丛), 2015, 30(4): 25-30.
|
|
[8]
|
邵培樟. 侵犯著作权犯罪之主观要件设置的反思与重构——数字网络环境下著作权刑法保护之有限扩张[J]. 湖北社会科学, 2014(4): 149-153.
|
|
[9]
|
田宏杰. 侵犯著作权犯罪法律适用的三个重点[J]. 人民检察, 2019(2): 47-48.
|
|
[10]
|
杨加明. “以营利为目的”存废论下网络著作权的刑法保护[J]. 海峡法学, 2017, 19(1): 54-62.
|
|
[11]
|
曾粤兴, 魏思婧. 我国知识产权刑法保护现存问题分析与完善[J]. 知识产权, 2017(10): 82-86+108.
|