论惩罚性赔偿规则在电商实践中的缺位及改善
On the Absence of Punitive Damages Rules in E-Commerce Practice and Their Improvement
摘要: 与传统商务领域相同,惩罚性赔偿规则在电商领域也具有维护消费者合法权益、营造良好市场环境的重要作用。目前,消费领域惩罚性赔偿规则在《中华人民共和国消费者权益保护法》等法律中有明确规定,但实践中惩罚性赔偿规则在电商领域的运用仍呈缺位状态,主要原因可归结为电商平台的假货认定标准单一、电商平台经营者应承担的审核义务不明确、消费者的维权成本与举证责任较大,对此,可通过改进假货认定标准、完善《电子商务法》中电商平台经营者审核义务的规定与减轻消费者在诉讼中应承担的举证责任这三种现实可行的方法,以推进惩罚性赔偿规则在电商实践中发展运用。
Abstract: Similar to the traditional business realm, the punitive compensation rule also plays a crucial role in safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of consumers and creating a favorable market environment within the e-commerce domain. At present, the punitive compensation rule in the consumer sphere is explicitly stipulated in laws such as the Law on the Protection of Consumer Rights and Interests. Nonetheless, in practice, the application of the punitive compensation rule in the e-commerce field is still lacking. The primary reasons can be summarized as follows: the criteria for identifying counterfeit products on e-commerce platforms are simplistic; the auditing obligations that e-commerce platform operators should assume are not clearly defined; and the costs of rights protection and the burden of proof for consumers are relatively high. In response to these issues, three practical and viable approaches can be taken. Firstly, improve the criteria for identifying counterfeit goods. Secondly, refine the regulations regarding the auditing obligations of e-commerce platform operators in the E-commerce Law. Thirdly, alleviate the burden of proof that consumers need to shoulder during litigation. By implementing these measures, we can promote the development and application of the punitive compensation rule in e-commerce practice.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
王利明. 惩罚性赔偿研究[J]. 中国社会科学, 2000(4): 112-122+206-207.
|
|
[2]
|
Owen, D.G. (1994) A Punitive Damages Overview: Functions, Problems and Reform. Villanova Law Review, 39, Article 363.
|
|
[3]
|
Taliadoros, J. (2015) The Roots of Punitive Damages at Common Law: A Longer History. Cleveland State Law Review, 64, Article 251.
|
|
[4]
|
李毅君. 消费者权益保护法中惩罚性赔偿条款的适用[J]. 人民司法, 2015(23): 82-86.
|
|
[5]
|
施雯馨, 谢可训. 民商法视阈下惩罚性赔偿制度应用研究[J]. 河北法律职业教育, 2024, 2(12): 86-90.
|
|
[6]
|
杨立新. 商品欺诈惩罚性赔偿责任适用范围争议之我见[J]. 江汉论坛, 2017(1): 114-120.
|
|
[7]
|
拓天财富. 某东“智臻生活”上线, 类似拼某某的假货问题再也无需担心? [EB/OL]. 2018-08-03. https://caifuhao.eastmoney.com/news/20180803160122122011110, 2025-07-05.
|
|
[8]
|
王道发. 电子商务平台经营者安保责任研究[J]. 中国法学, 2019(6): 282-300.
|
|
[9]
|
法治日报. 消费者网上买到假货为何难获赔偿[EB/OL]. http://www.xinhuanet.com/legal/20240827/21f74bf6d21d441781ca6a3c1ff21898/c.html, 2024-08-27.
|
|
[10]
|
大众青岛网. 某东买天梭表鉴定为假, 假一赔三变补偿200?小伙: 我倒贴500鉴定费! [EB/OL]. https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1816842637658626508&wfr=spider&for=pc, 2024-11-27.
|
|
[11]
|
曹险峰, 王堃宇. 论电子商务平台审核义务的规范构造[J]. 云南大学学报(社会科学版), 2025(3): 111-121.
|
|
[12]
|
叶逸群. 互联网平台责任: 从监管到治理[J]. 财经法学, 2018(5): 49-63.
|
|
[13]
|
Wilman, F. (2022) The Digital Services Act (DSA)—An Ooverview. SSRN Electronic Journal. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[14]
|
姜智颖, 马明飞. 论消费者权益保护法中惩罚性赔偿制度适用的界定[J]. 武汉冶金管理干部学院学报, 2022, 32(2): 19-22.
|
|
[15]
|
王文华, 张傲霜. 《电子商务法》实施五周年回顾与展望: 有效促进数字经济与实体经济融合发展[J]. 中国市场监管研究, 2024(1): 15-19.
|