人工智能客服对消费者绿色产品购买意愿的影响研究
The Influence of AI Customer Service on Consumers’ Green Product Purchase Intention
摘要: 本研究基于刺激–机体–反应(SOR)模型,探究了人工智能客服对消费者绿色购买意愿的影响机制。结果表明:1) 人工智能客服的拟人化设计、交互响应能力以及信息质量均显著正向影响消费者的感知信任与感知价值,其中交互响应能力对这两方面的驱动效应更为突出。2) 感知信任和感知价值进一步正向促进消费者的绿色购买意愿,且感知信任对购买意愿的促进作用高于感知价值。基于此,本研究建议电商企业优化人工智能客服的交互响应能力,深化拟人化设计,并整合权威环保认证以提升信息透明度,从而构建可信赖的绿色消费智能顾问体系,为可持续消费市场的发展提供坚实的技术支撑。
Abstract: This study employs the Stimulus-Organism-Response (SOR) framework to examine how AI customer service influences consumers’ green purchase intention. Results demonstrate that anthropo-morphic design, interactive responsiveness, and information quality of AI customer service significantly enhance consumers’ perceived trust and perceived value, with interactive responsiveness exhibiting the most substantial impact. Furthermore, both perceived trust and perceived value positively drive green purchase intention, though the effect of trust is markedly stronger than that of perceived value. The findings suggest that e-commerce enterprises should optimize AI response capabilities, advance anthropomorphic features, and integrate authoritative eco-certifications to build credible intelligent advisory systems for green consumption. These strategies provide critical technological support for sustainable market development.
文章引用:丁书娟. 人工智能客服对消费者绿色产品购买意愿的影响研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(9): 794-803. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.1492979

参考文献

[1] 冯文婷, 薛舒允, 汪涛. 拟人的品牌更环保? 拟人化沟通对促进绿色消费倾向的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2025, 57(4): 720-742.
[2] 龚思羽, 盛光华. 产品绿色属性信息对消费者决策的双刃剑效应: 形成机理与边界机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(9): 1611-1625.
[3] Silva, M.E., Sousa-Filho, J.M.d., Yamim, A.P. and Diógenes, A.P. (2020) Exploring Nuances of Green Skepticism in Different Economies. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 38, 449-463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] 梅蕾, 赵子牛. 在线展示与口碑对消费者绿色购买意愿的影响研究——基于绿色感知价值和绿色自我效能感的中介作用分析[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2024(5): 187-192.
[5] 魏瑾瑞, 黄宇航, 徐晓晴. “情绪价值”至上?——智能客服在服务失败情境下的补救策略及其有效性研究[J/OL]. 南开管理评论, 2025: 1-29.
https://link.cnki.net/urlid/12.1288.F.20250704.0841.002, 2025-09-04.
[6] Mourey, J.A., Olson, J.G. and Yoon, C. (2017) Products as Pals: Engaging with Anthropomorphic Products Mitigates the Effects of Social Exclusion. Journal of Consumer Research, 44, 414-431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Song, C.S. and Kim, Y. (2022) The Role of the Human-Robot Interaction in Consumers’ Acceptance of Humanoid Retail Service Robots. Journal of Business Research, 146, 489-503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Aggarwal, P. and McGill, A.L. (2012) When Brands Seem Human, Do Humans Act Like Brands? Automatic Behavioral Priming Effects of Brand Anthropomorphism. Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 307-323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Sidlauskiene, J., Joye, Y. and Auruskeviciene, V. (2023) AI-Based Chatbots in Conversational Commerce and Their Effects on Product and Price Perceptions. Electronic Markets, 33, Article No. 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Yuan, C., Zhang, C. and Wang, S. (2022) Social Anxiety as a Moderator in Consumer Willingness to Accept AI Assistants Based on Utilitarian and Hedonic Values. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 65, Article ID: 102878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Sharma, M., Joshi, S., Luthra, S. and Kumar, A. (2022) Impact of Digital Assistant Attributes on Millennials’ Purchasing Intentions: A Multi-Group Analysis Using PLS-SEM, Artificial Neural Network and fsQCA. Information Systems Frontiers, 26, 943-966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Gao, J., Zhang, C., Wang, K. and Ba, S. (2012) Understanding Online Purchase Decision Making: The Effects of Unconscious Thought, Information Quality, and Information Quantity. Decision Support Systems, 53, 772-781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Li, L., Lee, K.Y., Emokpae, E. and Yang, S. (2021) What Makes You Continuously Use Chatbot Services? Evidence from Chinese Online Travel Agencies. Electronic Markets, 31, 575-599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Li, W., Mao, Y. and Zhou, L. (2021) The Impact of Interactivity on User Satisfaction in Digital Social Reading: Social Presence as a Mediator. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 37, 1636-1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Kim, S., Yeo, J., Sohn, S.H., Rha, J., Choi, S., Choi, A., et al. (2012) Toward a Composite Measure of Green Consumption: An Exploratory Study Using a Korean Sample. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 33, 199-214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] 解芳, 盛光华, 龚思羽. 全民环境共治背景下参照群体对中国居民绿色购买行为的影响研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2019, 29(8): 66-75.
[17] Zeithaml, V.A. (1988) Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52, 2-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Guo, W. and Luo, Q. (2023) Investigating the Impact of Intelligent Personal Assistants on the Purchase Intentions of Generation Z Consumers: The Moderating Role of Brand Credibility. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 73, Article ID: 103353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Joo, E. and Yang, J. (2023) How Perceived Interactivity Affects Consumers’ Shopping Intentions in Live Stream Commerce: Roles of Immersion, User Gratification and Product Involvement. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 17, 754-772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Le, X.C. (2023) Inducing AI-Powered Chatbot Use for Customer Purchase: The Role of Information Value and Innovative Technology. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 25, 219-241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Pitardi, V. and Marriott, H.R. (2021) Alexa, She’s Not Human but… Unveiling the Drivers of Consumers’ Trust in Voice‐Based Artificial Intelligence. Psychology & Marketing, 38, 626-642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Zhang, X., Chen, K. and Li, S. (2024) The Effects of Green Advertising Appeal and Message Type on Purchase Intention. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 81, Article ID: 104007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Zameer, H. and Yasmeen, H. (2022) Green Innovation and Environmental Awareness Driven Green Purchase Intentions. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 40, 624-638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef