基于二元Logistic回归的重庆乡村新型民宿接受机制研究
A Binary Logistic Regression-Based Study on the Acceptance Mechanism of New-Type Rural Homestays in Chongqing
摘要: 在乡村旅游高质量发展背景下,探究游客对新型民宿的接受机制对于产品创新与市场引导具有重要意义。本研究以重庆乡村新型民宿为对象,在界定其智能技术体验、空间设计创新、自然沉浸融合三大特征的基础上,融合技术接受模型(TAM)与计划行为理论(TPB),构建接受机制模型。通过对483份调查问卷样本的二元Logistic回归分析发现,行为态度、主观规范、感知行为控制显著正向影响接受意愿,感知有用性呈边缘显著性,感知易用性与感知创新性虽然未达显著水平,但影响方向与理论一致,表明消费者更依赖实用主义价值感知与社会信任机制,而非技术酷炫和造型新奇。研究揭示了TAM与TPB整合框架在解释乡村新型民宿消费意愿中的适用性,并为地方政府与民宿经营主体在产品优化、市场细分及政策工具优化等方面提供理论支撑与实证参考。
Abstract: Against the backdrop of the high-quality development of rural tourism, understanding tourists’ acceptance mechanisms of new-type homestays is of great significance for product innovation and market guidance. Taking new-type rural homestays in Chongqing as the research object, this study first identifies their three major characteristics: intelligent technology experience, spatial design innovation, and nature-immersion integration. Based on these characteristics, an acceptance mechanism model is constructed by integrating the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). Using binary logistic regression on 483 questionnaire samples, the empirical results show that attitude toward behavior, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control have significant positive impacts on acceptance intention. Perceived usefulness exhibits marginal significance, while perceived ease of use and perceived innovativeness are not statistically significant, though their effect directions are consistent with theoretical expectations. This suggests that consumers rely more on practical value perception and social trust mechanisms rather than technical novelty or novel appearance. This study demonstrates the applicability of the TAM-TPB integrated framework in explaining consumption intentions toward rural new-type homestays and provides theoretical and empirical support for local governments and homestay operators in product optimization, market segmentation, and optimization of policy instruments.
文章引用:王渝, 张瑶, 郑漫. 基于二元Logistic回归的重庆乡村新型民宿接受机制研究[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2025, 14(9): 228-237. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2025.149799

参考文献

[1] 陈国华, 戴其文. 新时代农文旅融合下乡村民宿发展的特征、机制与影响[J]. 社会科学家, 2025(3): 83-89.
[2] 王洛坤, 冯维波. 乡村民宿可持续发展路径研究——以重庆城口县河鱼乡为例[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2024, 45(4): 247-257.
[3] 戴其文, 承忠彬, 徐伟, 等. 多维距离对民宿游客行为意向的影响: 兼论主客互动的调节效应[J]. 地理科学, 2024, 44(9): 1597-1608.
[4] 杨发祥, 李金梦. 要素赋能与场景营造: 乡村民宿产业发展的内在逻辑[J]. 社会发展研究, 2025, 12(2): 189-205.
[5] 马勇, 张颖. 滤镜“照骗”: 社交媒体情境下潜在旅游者认知失调对旅游意向的影响[J]. 旅游学刊, 2025, 40(6): 28-41.
[6] 陈扬乐, 崔文昕. 风险感知对冲浪旅游者重游意向的影响——以情绪和体验质量为中介[J]. 热带地理, 2023, 43(10): 2024-2034.
[7] 王金伟, 李洪鑫, 彭晖. 乡村振兴视域下数字科技赋能文旅融合的逻辑与路径[J]. 旅游学刊, 2024, 39(11): 11-13.
[8] 魏宝祥, 于奎双. 图文或视频: 社交媒体旅游信息形式对旅游意愿的影响[J]. 旅游学刊, 2025, 40(6): 42-54.
[9] 洪学婷, 张宏梅, 张业臣. Airbnb平台的使用意愿与使用行为——对技术接受模型的扩展[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2021, 40(4): 91-95.
[10] 程卫进, 李紫薇, 程雨, 等. 主-客价值共创行为意向的形成机制——基于计划行为理论扩展模型的解释[J]. 资源开发与市场, 2022, 38(9): 1025-1034.
[11] 刘光泽, 翁时秀. 乡村旅游住宿业本地经营者金融行为研究——对计划行为理论的调整[J]. 旅游学刊, 2024, 39(9): 77-90.
[12] 周晓玲. 基于可拓理论的智慧民宿综合评价研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 成都: 西华大学, 2021.
[13] 黄显锁. 基于地域文化特质的乡村民宿设计研究——以倡隆村民宿为例[J]. 城市建筑, 2025, 22(14): 111-114.
[14] 张小燕. 陕北地域文化在民宿空间设计中的应用探究[J]. 美与时代(城市版), 2025(6): 97-99.
[15] 汪成凯, 汪瑞霞. 空间叙事视角下乡村民宿情感体验设计策略研究[J]. 艺术教育, 2025(8): 207-210.
[16] 郭森, 苏晓梦, 龚慧. 原生态民宿在运营管理中存在的问题调查与分析——基于大理、丽江区域的实地考察[J]. 营销界, 2019(35): 86-88.
[17] 胡安宁, 盛渠成. 超越概念“命名”: 社会科学研究方法中的概念化[J]. 中国社会科学评价, 2025(1): 61-71, 158.
[18] Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D. (2000) A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46, 186-204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Khan, S. and Wahab, A. (2023) Engaging Customers through Satisfaction; Does Social Media Marketing and Perceived Innovativeness Really Matter? A Time-Lagged Study in the Hospitality Industry. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights, 7, 2347-2366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] 赵伟伟, 罗盛锋, 黄燕玲. 虚拟如何触动现实? “新世代”感知视角下的虚拟旅游影响机理研究[J]. 旅游科学, 2022, 36(5): 21-37.
[21] 舒小林, 单淑幸, 闵浙思, 等. 村超(BA)网红旅游地的体育文化旅游消费行为解析及其影响机制[J]. 经济地理, 2025, 45(1): 225-235.