电商直播平台“避风港原则”适用研究
Research on the Application of the “Safe Harbor Principle” in E-Commerce Live Streaming Platforms
摘要: 直播带货的兴起显著改变了电子商务生态,其即时性、强交互性等特点也带来了新的侵权风险。现行法律框架下,以“通知–删除”规则为核心的避风港原则在应对直播场景中的侵权问题时,面临着因技术特性差异而产生的适用困境。传统规则预设的平台被动性与损害可阻断性前提,在直播的即时交易、算法主动干预和平台深度介入现实下受到挑战。面对直播技术特性对避风港原则根基的冲击,可以采用“能力本位”视角,分析平台技术能力与风险预见可能性、注意义务生成之间的关系。并在此基础上,探索构建一种以平台实际技术控制力与商品风险属性为依据的分级义务体系,为直播电商平台的责任认定提供更符合技术现实的思路,寻求创新激励与权益保护的平衡点。
Abstract: The rise of live streaming e-commerce has significantly changed the e-commerce ecosystem, and its characteristics of immediacy and strong interactivity have also brought new infringement risks. Under the current legal framework, the safe harbor principle centered on the “notify delete” rule faces application difficulties due to differences in technical characteristics when dealing with infringement issues in live streaming scenarios. The traditional rules’ assumption of platform passivity and interruptibility of damage are challenged in the reality of live streaming instant trading, active algorithm intervention, and deep platform involvement. In the face of the impact of live streaming technology characteristics on the foundation of the safe harbor principle, a “capability based” perspective can be adopted to analyze the relationship between platform technology capabilities and the possibility of risk prediction and the generation of duty of care. On this basis, explore the construction of a hierarchical obligation system based on the actual technical control and product risk attributes of the platform, providing a more technically realistic approach for the responsibility determination of e-commerce live streaming platforms, and seeking a balance between innovation incentives and rights protection.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
张红, 孙悦. 网络直播带货主播的民事责任[J]. 学习与实践, 2025(5): 31-41.
|
|
[2]
|
魏剑锋, 李孟娜, 刘保平. 电商直播中主播特性对消费者冲动购买意愿的影响[J]. 中国流通经济, 2022, 36(4): 32-42.
|
|
[3]
|
赵雪, 张金凤. 网红直播带货售后服务对消费者行为的影响——直播生态下的多主体演化博弈[J]. 技术经济, 2024, 43(4): 143-158.
|
|
[4]
|
俞金香, 吕东岳. 网络直播营销广告代言人侵权责任的再配置[J]. 中国政法大学学报, 2021(5): 212-224.
|
|
[5]
|
黄薇. 中华人民共和国民法典侵权责任编释义[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2020: 93-104.
|
|
[6]
|
薛军. 《电子商务法》平台责任的内涵及其适用模式[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), 2023, 41(1): 57-68.
|
|
[7]
|
张洋. 算法推荐下版权过滤义务的构建[J]. 现代法学, 2023, 45(4): 75-89.
|
|
[8]
|
赵鹏. 私人审查的界限——论网络交易平台对用户内容的行政责任[J]. 清华法学, 2016, 10(6): 115-132.
|
|
[9]
|
王利明, 包丁裕睿. 论“通知”规则在生成式人工智能作品侵权中的类推适用[J]. 比较法研究, 2025(4): 1-13.
|
|
[10]
|
谢尧雯. 论美国互联网平台责任规制模式[J]. 行政法学研究, 2018(3): 133-144.
|
|
[11]
|
王储. 平台视角中的网络广告法律责任认定——基于美国《通信规范法》第230条展开[J]. 信息科技, 2023, 15(3): 141-146.
|
|
[12]
|
蒋红珍. 比例原则适用的范式转型[J]. 中国社会科学, 2021(4): 106-127, 206-207.
|
|
[13]
|
展鹏贺, 罗小坤. 互联网平台分级监管的法理逻辑与路径完善: 基于欧盟《数字服务法》的比较观察[J]. 湖南大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 37(3): 72-79.
|