股东出资加速到期制度研究
A Study on the System of Accelerated Maturity of Shareholders’ Capital Contributions
摘要: 在认缴制背景下,股东享有出资期限利益,但当公司无法清偿到期债务时,此利益应受限,以维护债权人权益。制度形成过程中,《公司法》历经多次修订,从严格设定加速到期条件到适度放宽门槛,逐步优化,但仍面临“公司不能清偿到期债务”认定标准模糊、出资财产清偿规则选择困难等困境。为完善该制度,采用“未清偿说”,即只要公司债权人能证明公司未及时清偿到期债务,就应判定公司不能清偿到期债务,无需将执行程序作为判定的必要条件;同时建议采取“入库规则”,股东提前缴纳的出资应先缴入公司账户,再由公司按照正常程序清偿债务,以实现债权人公平受偿,平衡股东出资自由与债权人利益保护,促进公司法体系的协调与完善。
Abstract: Under the capital subscription system, shareholders enjoy the benefit of deferred capital contribution. However, when a company is unable to repay its due debts, this benefit should be restricted to safeguard the interests of creditors. During the evolution of this legal framework, the Company Law has undergone several amendments—transitioning from stringent conditions for accelerating capital contributions to a more relaxed approach—gradually improving the system. Nevertheless, challenges persist, such as the ambiguous criteria for determining a company’s inability to repay debts and the complexity of choosing appropriate rules for using contributed capital to settle obligations. To improve the system, this paper advocates for the “Outstanding Debt Approach”, whereby a company is deemed unable to repay its debts if creditors can prove that due debts remain unpaid, without requiring formal enforcement proceedings. Additionally, the “Deposit Rule” is proposed: shareholders’ early contributions should first be deposited into the company’s account, and then used by the company through standard procedures to repay debts. This ensures equitable repayment to creditors, balances shareholders’ capital contribution autonomy with creditor protection, and promotes the coherence and enhancement of the corporate legal framework.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
梁上上. 未出资股东对公司债权人的补充赔偿责任[J]. 中外法学, 2015, 27(3): 649-664.
|
|
[2]
|
丁勇. 认缴制后公司法资本规则的革新[J]. 法学研究, 2018, 40(2): 155-174.
|
|
[3]
|
郗伟明. 股东出资义务“常态加速到期理论”之反思——兼论对不诚信认缴出资行为的可行规制[J]. 法商研究, 2022, 39(3): 85-98.
|
|
[4]
|
钱玉林. 股东出资加速到期的理论证成[J]. 法学研究, 2020, 42(6): 114-127.
|
|
[5]
|
蒋大兴. 论出资义务加速到期的商业逻辑——股东/董事作为履行者与监督者责任之差异[J]. 上海政法学院学报(法治论丛), 2022, 37(6): 42-59.
|
|
[6]
|
徐强胜. 公司关系视角下认缴资本制的修正[J]. 法治研究, 2022(5): 60-72.
|
|
[7]
|
刘铭卿. 股东出资义务加速到期研究[J]. 政治与法律, 2019(4): 153-161+152.
|
|
[8]
|
王利明. 民法[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2010: 328.
|
|
[9]
|
周游. 新公司法条文解读与适用指引: 案例·规则·文献[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2024: 119.
|
|
[10]
|
王东明. 全国人民代表大会常务委员会执法检查组关于检查《中华人民共和国企业破产法》实施情况的报告——2021年8月18日在第十三届全国人民代表大会常务委员会第三十次会议上[EB/OL]. http://www.npc.gov.cn/npc/c2/kgfb/202108/t20210818_312967.html, 2025-06-11.
|
|
[11]
|
汪青松, 张汉成. 认缴登记制下缴资难题破解的体系化进路[J]. 社会科学研究, 2022(5): 89-97.
|
|
[12]
|
蒋大兴. 论股东出资义务之“加速到期”——认可“非破产加速”之功能价值[J]. 社会科学, 2019(2): 98-113.
|
|
[13]
|
澎湃新闻·澎湃号·政务. 西城法院审结首例适用新公司法加速到期规则案件[EB/OL]. https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_27939916, 2025-06-11.
|
|
[14]
|
刘俊海. 论注册资本认缴制的兴利除弊: 兼论期限利益与交易安全的动态平衡[J]. 学术论坛, 2024, 47(1): 44-59.
|
|
[15]
|
李建伟. 公司法评注[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2024: 233.
|