从语法音变看能性“V得/不C”的句法生成
A Syntactic Analysis of Potential Structures “V De/Bu C” from the Perspective of Grammatical Phonetic Modification
摘要: 文章从语法音变的视角出发,发现表示实现意义的“V得/不C”在语法化出能性意义的同时,其内部的语法结构关系也发生了改变,即“得/不”发生语法音变,“得”从词缀变成附缀,“不”则从副词变成附缀。“得/不”的语法音变证实,在句法制图模式下“V得/不C”可以句法还原分析为能性情态/否定能性情态短语等句法投射。此外,因为“得/不”的语法音变产生于“V得/不C”的结构内部,属于结构内部的语法关系调整,而且“得/不”的语序也一直处于V和C之间。所以“得/不”作为功能核心在“V得/不C”内部形成句法投射的同时,还要在逻辑层面上发生提升,从而实现能性特征的解读。
Abstract: From the perspective of grammatical phonetic modification, this paper finds that, when potential modalities emerge on “V de/bu C”, grammatical phonetic modifications also happen on “de/bu”, in which “de” changes from an affix to a clitic, and “bu” changes from an adverb to a clitic. This verifies that “V de/bu C” could be analyzed as such syntactic projections as potential modality or negative potential modality phrases. Furthermore, because potential modalities occur inside “V de/bu C”, which belong to inner adjustments of grammatical structures, and the word orders of “de/bu” remain unchanged between V and C. Therefore, while “de/bu” generate syntactic projections within “V de/bu C”, they also need to be elevated in logical form to meet their modality interpretations.
文章引用:年震. 从语法音变看能性“V得/不C”的句法生成[J]. 现代语言学, 2025, 13(9): 409-419. https://doi.org/10.12677/ml.2025.139994

参考文献

[1] 王力. 中国现代语法[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1943/2014: 68-81.
[2] 朱德熙. 语法讲义[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1982: 125-139.
[3] 吴福祥. 汉语能性述补结构“V得/不C”的语法化[J]. 中国语文, 2002(1): 29-40+95.
[4] 汪昌松. 句法-形态接口视域下的“得”字结构研究[J]. 语言教学与研究, 2024(2): 87-99.
[5] 吕叔湘, 主编. 现代汉语八百词(增订本) [M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1980/1999: 91-92.
[6] 吴福祥. 能性述补结构琐议[J]. 语言教学与研究, 2002(5): 19-27.
[7] 赵元任. 汉语口语语法[M]. 吕叔湘, 译. 北京: 北京商务印书馆, 1979: 210.
[8] 宋文辉. 和确定黏合式述补结构语法地位相关的几个形态学问题[J]. 语文研究, 2015(4): 42-49.
[9] Tsai, W.D. (2001) On Subject Specificity and Theory of Syntax-Semantics Interface. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 10, 129-168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Cheng, G. (2017) The Postverbal ACQ and Its Alethic Modality. In: Zh, S.F., Ed., Studies on Syntactic Cartography, China Social Sciences Publishing Company, 163-196.
[11] Wang, Ch.S. (2014) Exploring the Interface between Syntax and Morphology—A Case Study of de in Chinese. Ph.D. Thesis, Beijing Language and Culture University.
[12] Wang, C. (2020) A Note on the Non-Existence of Infixes in Mandarin Chinese. Word, 66, 119-129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Wu, C.H. (2004) On de/bu and the Syntactic Nature of Resultative Verbal Compounding. Language and Linguistics, 5, 271-329.
[14] 蒋绍愚. 内部构拟法在近代汉语语法研究中的运用[J]. 中国语文, 1995(3): 191-194.
[15] 司富珍. 汉语语法音变管窥[J]. 华文教学与研究, 2019(2): 16-24+86.
[16] 沈家煊. 也谈能性述补语“V得C”和“V不C”的不对称[C]//认知与汉语语法研究. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2006: 185-205.
[17] 徐杰. 词缀少但语缀多: 汉语语法特点的重新概括[J]. 华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2010(2): 113-118.
[18] 陆丙甫, 完权. 附缀的分布与黏着性[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报, 2022(4): 44-52.
[19] Baker, M.C. (2008) The Syntax of Agreement and Concord. Cambridge University Press, 353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Li, Y.F. (2022) Universal Grammar and Iconicity. Cambridge University Press, 165-181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef