中间品进口、绿色创新与企业碳强度——基于质量和产品转换维度
Imported Intermediate Goods, Green Innovation, and Corporate Carbon Intensity—Based on the Dimensions of Quality and Product Switching
摘要: 实现“双碳”目标的关键在于微观企业的减排行为,而投入要素优化与调整是企业碳减排的重要环节。本文在产品质量和转换双视角下考察了中间品进口行为对制造业企业碳强度的影响。利用我国2007~2015年上市公司与中国海关进出口数据,测算了企业中间品进口质量与产品转换指标,并进一步探究了质量和转换两个维度影响碳强度的作用机制。研究发现,进口中间品质量提升和转换调整均能抑制企业碳强度的增长,且分样本结果表明,在非国有企业、高科技企业、非高污染企业样本中对碳强度的影响系数更大。此外,本文发现两种方式的作用机制有所不同,中间品质量的提升能够通过提高企业绿色创新水平进而抑制碳强度增长。文章的研究成果为从企业进口中间品调整视角抑制碳强度并促进创新提供了决策参考。
Abstract: The key to achieving the “dual carbon” goals lies in the emission reduction behaviors of micro-level enterprises, with the optimization and adjustment of input factors being a crucial part of corporate carbon reduction. This paper examines the impact of intermediate goods imports on the carbon intensity of manufacturing firms from the dual perspectives of product quality and product switching. Using data from Chinese listed companies and customs import-export records between 2007 and 2015, we measure the quality of imported intermediate goods and product switching indicators at the firm level, and further explore the mechanisms through which these two dimensions affect carbon intensity. The findings reveal that both the improvement of imported intermediate goods quality and product switching can suppress the growth of corporate carbon intensity. Sub-sample analysis indicates that the effect is more pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises, high-tech firms, and non-high-pollution industries. Additionally, the study identifies distinct mechanisms for these two approaches: the enhancement of intermediate goods quality can reduce carbon intensity by boosting green innovation. The research provides decision-making insights for curbing carbon intensity and fostering innovation through the lens of firms’ intermediate goods import adjustments.
文章引用:冉诗怡. 中间品进口、绿色创新与企业碳强度——基于质量和产品转换维度[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(9): 1111-1126. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.1493019

参考文献

[1] Imbruno, M. and Ketterer, T.D. (2018) Energy Efficiency Gains from Importing Intermediate Inputs: Firm-Level Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Development Economics, 135, 117-141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] 韩国高, 刘田广. 中间品进口、制度环境与中国企业能源强度[J]. 经济科学, 2021(3): 44-56.
[3] 李平, 丁世豪. 进口技术溢出提升了制造业能源效率吗? [J]. 中国软科学, 2019(12): 137-149.
[4] 韩纪琴, 周靖. 扩大中间品进口规模对生态环境与产业链安全影响研究——基于制造业异质性中间品进口的污染减排效应分析[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2020(7): 154-157, 180.
[5] Dussaux, D., Vona, F. and Dechezleprêtre, A. (2023) Imported Carbon Emissions: Evidence from French Manufacturing Companies. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne déconomique, 56, 593-621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Akerman, A., Forslid, R. and Prane, O. (2024) Imports and the CO2 Emissions of Firms. Journal of International Economics, 152, 104004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Collard-Wexler, A. and De Loecker, J. (2015) Reallocation and Technology: Evidence from the US Steel Industry. American Economic Review, 105, 131-171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Goldberg, P.K., Khandelwal, A.K., Pavcnik, N. and Topalova, P. (2010) Imported Intermediate Inputs and Domestic Product Growth: Evidence from India. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125, 1727-1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Seker, M., Rodriguez-Delgado, D. and Ulu, M.F. (2018) Imported Intermediate Goods and Product Innovation. Journal of International Economics, 150, Article ID: 103927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 李丹, 宋换换, 崔日明. 进口中间品内嵌技术与企业创新[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2022(8): 19-36.
[11] 张杰. 进口对中国制造业企业专利活动的抑制效应研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2015(7): 68-83.
[12] 张晓莉, 孙琪琪. 中间品进口与企业研发创新——“增量”还是“提质”? [J]. 世界经济文汇, 2021(3): 103-119.
[13] 黎峰. 中间品进口如何影响国内企业自主创新[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2024(6): 39-55.
[14] 王彩明, 李健. 中国区域绿色创新绩效评价及其时空差异分析——基于2005-2015年的省际工业企业面板数据[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(6): 29-42.
[15] 赵喜仓, 蒋美, 洪逗. 绿色技术创新对减污降碳协同效应的影响[J/OL]. 科技进步与对策, 2024: 1-13.
https://link.cnki.net/urlid/42.1224.G3.20240830.1413.002, 2025-08-05.
[16] Barrows, G. and Ollivier, H. (2014) Does Trade Make Firms Cleaner? Theory and Evidence from Indian Manufacturing.
https://are.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/job-candidates/paper/JMPBarrows.pdf
[17] 许家云, 毛其淋, 胡鞍钢. 中间品进口与企业出口产品质量升级: 基于中国证据的研究[J]. 世界经济, 2017, 40(3): 52-75.
[18] Elrod, A.A. and Malik, A.S. (2017) The Effect of Environmental Regulation on Plant-Level Product Mix: A Study of EPA’s Cluster Rule. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 83, 164-184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Bloom, N., Draca, M. and van Reenen, J. (2016) Trade Induced Technical Change? The Impact of Chinese Imports on Innovation, IT and Productivity. The Review of Economic Studies, 83, 87-117.
[20] Castellani, D. and Fassio, C. (2019) From New Imported Inputs to New Exported Products. Firm-Level Evidence from Sweden. Research Policy, 48, 322-338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] 李青原, 肖泽华. 异质性环境规制工具与企业绿色创新激励——来自上市企业绿色专利的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2020, 55(9): 192-208.
[22] 沈洪涛, 黄楠. 碳排放权交易机制能提高企业价值吗[J]. 财贸经济, 2019, 40(1): 144-161.
[23] Cui, J., Tam, O.K., Wang, B. and Zhang, Y. (2020) The Environmental Effect of Trade Liberalization: Evidence from China’s Manufacturing Firms. The World Economy, 43, 3357-3383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Khandelwal, A.K., Schott, P.K. and Wei, S.J. (2013) Trade Liberalization and Embedded Institutional Reform: Evidence from Chinese Exporters. American Economic Review, 103, 2169-2195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] 施炳展, 曾祥菲. 中国企业进口产品质量测算与事实[J]. 世界经济, 2015, 38(3): 57-77.
[26] 祝树金, 金小剑, 赵玉龙. 进口产品转换如何影响出口国内增加值[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2018(11): 1-16.
[27] Borusyak, K., Hull, P. and Jaravel, X. (2021) Quasi-experimental Shift-Share Research Designs. The Review of Economic Studies, 89, 181-213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] 陈登科. 贸易壁垒下降与环境污染改善——来自中国企业污染数据的新证据[J]. 经济研究, 2020, 55(12): 98-114.
[29] 张兵, 宋超凡. 数字化转型、进口中间品内嵌技术与新能源汽车产业链韧性[J]. 国际经贸探索, 2024, 40(9): 73-88.
[30] Batrakova, S. and Davies, R.B. (2012) Is There an Environmental Benefit to Being an Exporter? Evidence from Firm-Level Data. Review of World Economics, 148, 449-474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[31] 林正静, 左连村. 进口中间品质量与企业生产率: 基于中国制造业企业的研究[J]. 南方经济, 2018(11): 27-46.
[32] 祝树金, 钟腾龙, 李仁宇. 中间品贸易自由化与多产品出口企业的产品加成率[J]. 中国工业经济, 2018(1): 41-59.