临床教学质量评价系统的研究进展
Research Progress of Clinical Teaching Quality Evaluation System
摘要: 背景：教学医院承担医疗服务和人才培养双重职责，临床教师专业发展是提升培训质量的核心。荷兰教学质量评估系统(System for Evaluation of Teaching Qualities，SETQ量表)为教师评价提供了重要的参考价值，并在多个国家得到了广泛验证。方法：本文对2009~2024年PubMed和中国知网收录的28篇SETQ相关文献，重点分析其心理测量学特征及应用效果。结果：在PubMed和中国知网上，涉及“SETQ”的研究共30篇，经过筛查后保留28篇。这些研究主要探讨了SETQ量表在不同应用场景下的心理测量特征，包括信度分析、结构效度分析，以及量表结果反馈的实施情况、人口特征与教育环境感知之间的相关性。结论：基于SETQ量表的教师评价系统对临床医学教育具有积极意义，有助于提高教师的教学质量，促进临床医学教育的持续发展。
Abstract: Background: As healthcare institutions dedicated to both medical service and talent development, teaching hospitals rely on the professional growth of clinical faculty as the cornerstone of enhancing training quality. The Dutch-developed System for Evaluation of Teaching Qualities (SETQ) offers a robust benchmark for appraising medical educators and has been validated across multiple countries. Methods: This study examines 28 articles on the System for Evaluation of Teaching Qualities (SETQ), retrieved from both PubMed and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) between 2009 and 2024, focusing specifically on their psychometric characteristics and implemented effectiveness. Results: This study identified 30 articles related to the “SETQ” on PubMed and the CNKI. After screening, 28 were included for analysis. These studies primarily investigate the psychometric properties of the SETQ questionnaire across various contexts, including reliability analysis, construct validity analysis, as well as the implementation of feedback based on its results, and the correlation between demographic characteristics and perceptions of the educational environment. Conclusion: The SETQ-based teacher evaluation system holds positive significance for clinical medical education, as it contributes to enhancing teaching quality and promoting the sustainable development of clinical medical training.
文章引用：刘伟文, 黄才埔, 李永强. 临床教学质量评价系统的研究进展[J]. 教育进展, 2025, 15(9): 665-672. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2025.1591722

参考文献

[1] 张黎峰, 张婕, 毛雯靖, 等. 国内外住院医师规范化培训师资胜任力研究进展[J]. 中国社会医学杂志, 2023, 40(3): 277-280.
[2] Lombarts, K.M., Heineman, M.J. and Arah, O.A. (2010) Good Clinical Teachers Likely to Be Specialist Role Models: Results from a Multicenter Cross-Sectional Survey. PLOS ONE, 5, e15202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Lombarts, M.J., Arah, O.A., Busch, O.R., et al. (2010) Using the SETQ System to Evaluate and Improve Teaching Qualities of Clinical Teachers. Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Geneeskunde, 154, A1222.
[4] Schuwirth, L.W. (2010) Evaluation of Students and Teachers. Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Geneeskunde, 154, A1677.
[5] Arah, O.A., Hoekstra, J.B.L., Bos, A.P. and Lombarts, K.M. (2011) New Tools for Systematic Evaluation of Teaching Qualities of Medical Faculty: Results of an Ongoing Multi-Center Survey. PLOS ONE, 6, e25983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] van der Leeuw, R., Lombarts, K., Heineman, M.J. and Arah, O. (2011) Systematic Evaluation of the Teaching Qualities of Obstetrics and Gynecology Faculty: Reliability and Validity of the SETQ Tools. PLOS ONE, 6, e19142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Arah, O.A., Heineman, M.J. and Lombarts, K.M. (2012) Factors Influencing Residents’ Evaluations of Clinical Faculty Member Teaching Qualities and Role Model Status. Medical Education, 46, 381-389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Boerebach, B.C.M., Arah, O.A., Busch, O.R.C. and Lombarts, K.M. (2012) Reliable and Valid Tools for Measuring Surgeons’ Teaching Performance: Residents’ vs. Self Evaluation. Journal of Surgical Education, 69, 511-520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Lases, S.S.L., Arah, O.A., Pierik, E.G.J.M.R., Heineman, E. and Lombarts, M.J. (2014) Residents’ Engagement and Empathy Associated with Their Perception of Faculty’s Teaching Performance. World Journal of Surgery, 38, 2753-2760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Dickinson, K.J., Bass, B.L., Graviss, E.A., Nguyen, D.T. and Pei, K.Y. (2021) How Learning Preferences and Teaching Styles Influence Effectiveness of Surgical Educators. The American Journal of Surgery, 221, 256-260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Lewis, J.M., Yared, K., Heidel, R.E., Kirkpatrick, B., Freeman, M.B., Daley, B.J., et al. (2021) Emotional Intelligence and Burnout Related to Resident-Assessed Faculty Teaching Scores. Journal of Surgical Education, 78, e100-e111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Zhou, N.J., Kamil, R.J., Hillel, A.T., Tan, M., Walsh, J., Russell, J.O., et al. (2021) The Role of Preoperative Briefing and Postoperative Debriefing in Surgical Education. Journal of Surgical Education, 78, 1182-1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Lombarts, K.M., Bucx, M.J.L. and Arah, O.A. (2009) Development of a System for the Evaluation of the Teaching Qualities of Anesthesiology Faculty. Anesthesiology, 111, 709-716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Boerebach, B.C.M., Lombarts, K.M. and Arah, O.A. (2016) Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the System for Evaluation of Teaching Qualities (SETQ) in Graduate Medical Training. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 39, 21-32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Lombarts, K.M., Ferguson, A., Hollmann, M.W., Malling, B., Arah, O.A., Berger, M.M., et al. (2016) Redesign of the System for Evaluation of Teaching Qualities in Anesthesiology Residency Training (SETQ smart). Anesthesiology, 125, 1056-1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Al Ansari, A., Strachan, K., Hashim, S. and Otoom, S. (2017) Analysis of Psychometric Properties of the Modified SETQ Tool in Undergraduate Medical Education. BMC Medical Education, 17, Article No. 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Boldaji, F.T., Amini, M. and Parvizi, M.M. (2022) Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of System for Evaluation of Teaching Qualities by Students: A Tool for Assessing Clinical Tutors from Students’ Viewpoint. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 11, Article No. 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Breckwoldt, J., Marty, A.P., Stricker, D., Stolz, R., Thomasin, R., Seeholzer, N., et al. (2022) Bottom-Up Feedback to Improve Clinical Teaching: Validation of the Swiss System for Evaluation of Teaching Qualities (SwissSETQ). Swiss Medical Weekly, 152, w30137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] van Engelen, T.S., van der Leeuw, R.M. and Lombarts, M.J. (2016) Supervisors Being Assessed. Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Geneeskunde, 160, D419.
[20] Van Der Leeuw, R.M., Boerebach, B.C.M., Lombarts, K.M., Heineman, M.J. and Arah, O.A. (2016) Clinical Teaching Performance Improvement of Faculty in Residency Training: A Prospective Cohort Study. Medical Teacher, 38, 464-470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Yong, R.L., Cheung, W., Shrivastava, R.K. and Bederson, J.B. (2022) Teaching Quality in Neurosurgery: Quantitating Outcomes over Time. Journal of Neurosurgery, 136, 1147-1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Lombarts, K.M., Heineman, M.J., Scherpbier, A.J.J.A. and Arah, O.A. (2014) Effect of the Learning Climate of Residency Programs on Faculty’s Teaching Performance as Evaluated by Residents. PLOS ONE, 9, e86512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Scheepers, R.A., Lombarts, K.M., van Aken, M.A.G., Heineman, M.J. and Arah, O.A. (2014) Personality Traits Affect Teaching Performance of Attending Physicians: Results of a Multi-Center Observational Study. PLOS ONE, 9, e98107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] 冯玉波, 朱滨海, 占伊扬, 等. 基于柯式模型的住院医师规范化培训医学模拟师资培训效果评价[J]. 中国毕业后医学教育, 2023, 7(6): 438-441+446.
[25] 邢桂枚, 严汪龙, 阮三平, 等. 安徽省全科医学师资培训的效果评价[J]. 安徽医专学报, 2023, 22(1): 5-7.
[26] 张云, 刘儒鹏, 韦英才, 等. 壮医学专业实践教学师资队伍现状分析与对策研究[J]. 中医药管理杂志, 2022, 30(20): 101-103.
[27] 赵稳稳, 王荣英, 张金佳, 等. 全科医学师资质量评价体系建设研究进展[J]. 中国全科医学, 2024, 27(7): 784-788+800.
[28] Bezerra, N.C., Lombarts, K.M., Naiz, S.C.d.R., Castanhel, F.D. and Grosseman, S. (2024) System for Evaluation of Teaching Qualities (SETQ) Smart Para O Uso No Brasil: Versão Para Residente. Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica, 48, e076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 

为你推荐