基于句酷批改网的师生合作评价应用于高中记叙文写作中的困境与对策研究
A Study on the Dilemmas and Countermeasures of the Application of Teacher-Student Collaborative Assessment Based on Juku Online Evaluation System in High School Narrative Writing
摘要: 《普通高中英语课程标准》(2017年版)对高中生的英语记叙文写作能力提出了更高的要求,明确指出学生要能掌握记叙文的基本结构和续写他们所读的语篇。评价是高中英语写作教学中的重要一环,然而在实际的教学中,写作评价环节往往由于教学任务繁重被忽视,存在评价手段单一、评价效率低等问题。在对师生合作评价的内涵和有效性进行研究后,结合教学实例,阐述如何将句酷批改网和师生合作评价有效利用于高中英语写作教学中,从“词汇–语法–结构–内容”四个维度进行作文机器评价和师生合作评价,并展示学生取得的学习成果,说明基于师生合作评价的记叙作文讲评课的有效性,为后续的教学提供参考。研究表明,基于句酷批改网的师生合作评价能提高学生的写作成绩,且对学生作文的内容平均得分提升作用最显著,其次是结构、语法和词汇。根据研究结果和教学实现,本文提出了有效发挥机器评价的作用、师生合作评价过程效益化、再次评价功能化、灵活调整评价焦点、评价周期长期化五个策略以提高学生的英语写作能力。
Abstract: The “General Senior High School English Curriculum Standards” (2017 Edition) has put forward higher requirements for high school students’ ability to write narrative essays in English, clearly stating that students should be able to master the basic structure of narrative essays and continue the passages they have read. Evaluation is an important part of teaching high school English writing. However, in actual teaching, the writing evaluation link is often neglected due to the heavy teaching tasks, and there are problems such as single evaluation methods and low evaluation efficiency. After studying the connotation and effectiveness of teacher-student cooperative evaluation, combined with teaching examples, this paper expounds how to effectively utilize Juku Correction Network and teacher-student cooperative evaluation in high school English writing teaching. The composition machine evaluation and teacher-student cooperative evaluation are carried out from the four dimensions of “vocabulary-grammar-structure-content”, and the learning achievements of students are presented. This paper explains the effectiveness of the narrative composition review class based on the cooperative evaluation between teachers and students, and provides a reference for subsequent teaching. Research shows that the teacher-student collaborative assessment based on Juku online evaluation system can improve students’ writing grades, and it has the most significant effect on increasing the average score of students’ composition content, followed by structure, grammar and vocabulary. Based on the research findings and teaching practice, this paper proposes five strategies to enhance students’ English writing ability: effectively leveraging the role of machine evaluation, optimizing the benefits of the teacher-student collaborative evaluation process, functionalizing the re-evaluation, flexibly adjusting the evaluation focus, and extending the evaluation cycle.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
中华人民共和国教育部. 普通高中英语课程标准(2017年版2020年修订) [S]. 北京: 人民教育出版社, 2020.
|
|
[2]
|
徐倩. 中学英语写作评价中存在的问题与对策[J]. 教育理论与实践, 2021, 41(5): 59-61.
|
|
[3]
|
陈天敏. 高中英语写作教学存在的问题与对策研究[J]. 英语教师, 2024, 24(8): 144-147.
|
|
[4]
|
任伟, 刘远博, 解月. 英语写作教学中ChatGPT与教师反馈的对比研究[J]. 外语教学理论与实践, 2024(4): 30-38, 60.
|
|
[5]
|
周雪. 过程写作中的同伴评价[J]. 甘肃教育学院学报(社会科学版), 2003(4): 85-88.
|
|
[6]
|
文秋芳. “师生合作评价”: “产出导向法”创设的新评价形式[J]. 外语界, 2016(5): 37-43.
|
|
[7]
|
孙曙光. “师生合作评价”课堂反思性实践研究[J]. 现代外语, 2017, 40(3): 397-406, 439.
|
|
[8]
|
张雨茜. “师生合作评价”和“教师 + 学生反馈”在初中英语写作教学中效果的对比研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 陕西师范大学, 2018.
|
|
[9]
|
林琳, 杨玉鑫. “师生合作评价”对英语写作自我效能感的影响研究[J]. 外语教育研究前沿, 2022, 5(4): 18-26, 91.
|
|
[10]
|
陈嘉媛. 师生合作评价对初中英语记叙文写作的影响研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 济宁: 曲阜师范大学, 2024.
|