肺部感染病原体识别中的NGS与传统方法比较
Comparison of NGS and Traditional Methods in Identifying Pathogens Causing Lung Infections
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2025.1592537, PDF,   
作者: 高佳乐:延安大学医学院,陕西 延安;延安大学附属医院呼吸科,陕西 延安;常小红*:延安大学附属医院呼吸科,陕西 延安
关键词: 肺部感染NGS病原体识别Lung Infection NGS Pathogen Detection
摘要: 肺部感染在免疫缺陷及老年患者中病死率高。传统检测方法存在周期长(48~72小时)、敏感性低、苛养菌检出困难及诊断窗口期等局限,导致治疗延误。高通量测序技术(next-generation sequencing, NGS)通过无偏倚检测总核酸,实现细菌、病毒、真菌和寄生虫同步识别,使病原体检出率提升20%~30%,对混合感染、罕见病原体及抗生素预处理样本优势显著,检测时效缩至24~48小时。其敏感性优于传统方法,但低生物量样本仍受宿主核酸干扰;特异性依赖严格生物信息学分析,需结合临床区分致病菌与定植菌。该技术使病毒检出率提升28%,显著提高免疫抑制患者罕见病原识别能力;耐药基因检测灵敏度优于传统测序,但存在同源病毒分型误差及成本高昂问题。NGS通过快速精准诊断优化临床决策:提前指导靶向治疗使重症患者28天生存率提升30%,并推动抗生素精准使用。临床应用仍面临宿主核酸干扰、15%耐药基因沉默现象、成本高及标准化缺失等挑战。未来发展需采用分层诊断策略(高危患者首选宏基因组测序),推动CRISPR等多技术融合,依托医保政策支持协同价值。开发超低量测序、动态耐药库及解读系统,将促进该技术成为感染性疾病精准诊疗核心工具。
Abstract: Pulmonary infections have a high mortality rate in immunocompromised and elderly patients. Traditional diagnostic methods have limitations such as long turnaround times (48~72 hours), low sensitivity, difficulty in detecting fastidious bacteria, and diagnostic window periods, which can lead to treatment delays. High-throughput sequencing technology enables unbiased detection of total nucleic acids, achieving simultaneous identification of bacteria, viruses, fungi, and parasites. This improves pathogen detection rates by 20%~30%, with significant advantages for mixed infections, rare pathogens, and antibiotic-pretreated samples, reducing detection time to 24~48 hours. Its sensitivity surpasses traditional methods, but low-biological-mass samples remain susceptible to host nucleic acid interference; specificity depends on rigorous bioinformatics analysis and requires clinical differentiation between pathogenic and colonizing bacteria. This technology increases viral detection rates by 28%, significantly enhancing the identification of rare pathogens in immunocompromised patients; antibiotic resistance gene detection sensitivity surpasses traditional sequencing, but it faces issues such as homologous viral typing errors and high costs. NGS optimizes clinical decision-making through rapid and accurate diagnosis: early guidance on targeted therapy improves the 28-day survival rate of critically ill patients by 30% and promotes the precise use of antibiotics. Clinical applications still face challenges such as host nucleic acid interference, 15% gene silencing of drug resistance, high costs, and a lack of standardization. Future development requires a stratified diagnostic strategy (metagenomic sequencing as the first choice for high-risk patients), the integration of multiple technologies such as CRISPR, and the support of medical insurance policies to leverage synergistic value. The development of ultra-low-volume sequencing, dynamic resistance databases, and interpretation systems will promote this technology as a core tool for precision diagnosis and treatment of infectious diseases.
文章引用:高佳乐, 常小红. 肺部感染病原体识别中的NGS与传统方法比较[J]. 临床医学进展, 2025, 15(9): 636-644. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2025.1592537

参考文献

[1] 杨青彦, 刘君毅, 殷正伟, 杨俊伟, 索敬钧, 王长安, 王晓勃, 李涛. 肺泡灌洗液宏基因组二代测序在肾移植后肺部感染病原体鉴别中的应用[J]. 热带医学杂志, 2025, 25(4): 511-514.
[2] 裴利娜. 多层螺旋CT联合血清学检测对小儿支原体肺炎临床等级及预后评估的研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 锦州: 锦州医科大学, 2024.
[3] 李婷, 何铭辉, 林钊, 赖炳权, 李中鹏, 何志捷. 病原靶向二代测序(t-NGS)在重症患者中的病原学诊断应用研究[J]. 岭南急诊医学杂志, 2024, 29(6): 624-627+631.
[4] 杜竺蔓. 支原体肺炎患者靶向NGS检测分析: 单纯感染与合并感染的临床特征比较[J]. 中国医药指南, 2024, 22(31): 48-51.
[5] 曹学秀, 张瑜芯, 陈力, 孙桂芹. 病原体宏基因组分析技术在罕见感染中的应用[J]. 浙江临床医学, 2024, 26(12): 1878-1881.
[6] Liu, Y., Chen, K., Wang, L., Yu, X., Xu, C., Suo, Z., et al. (2025) Assembly-Free Reads Accurate Identification (AFRAID) Approach Outperforms Other Methods of DNA Barcoding in the Walnut Family (Juglandaceae). Plant Diversity, 47, 115-126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] 陈仕军, 黄大海. BNP与TNF-α水平变化早期诊断心力衰竭伴肺部感染的特异性及敏感性[J]. 海南医学, 2017, 28(13): 2086-2088.
[8] 肖金波, 于秋丽, 张勇. 2017-2018年河北省重症手足口病的主要致病病原体为柯萨奇病毒A组6型[J]. 病毒学报, 2020, 36(2): 192-200.
[9] 刘琳, 吴蓉, 姚彪. 43例晚期肺癌合并肺部混合感染临床分析[J]. 中外医疗, 2008(6): 5-6.
[10] 裴红运, 山凤莲. mNGS在肺部感染应用中的研究进展[J]. 临床医学进展, 2023, 13(1): 436-441.
[11] Xie, J.Y., Wang, X.W., Zhang, J., et al. (2021) Clinical Value of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in the Rapid Diagnosis of Bacterial Pathogens in Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, 11, Article ID: 715658.
[12] Christensen, J.J., Blaser, M.J., et al. (2022) Optimizing Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for Bacterial Pathogen Detection: A Standardized Background Database with Site-Specific Cutoffs. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 60, e00117-22.
[13] Schlaberg, R., Chiu, C.Y., Miller, S., Procop, G.W. and Weinstock, G. (2017) Validation of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing Tests for Universal Pathogen Detection. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 141, 776-786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] 张敏, 李伟, 王涛, 等. 二代测序技术在乙型肝炎病毒耐药检测中的应用价值[J]. 中华肝脏病杂志, 2023, 31(5): 577-581.
[15] Geng, S.K., Mei, Q., Zhu, C.Y., et al. (2021) Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing Technology for Detection of Pathogens in Blood of Critically Ill Patients. Journal of Infection, 83, Article ID: 115908.
[16] Heravi, F.S., Zakrzewski, M., Vickery, K., et al. (2020) Host DNA Depletion Efficiency of Microbiome DNA Enrichment Methods in Infected Tissue Samples. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 171, Article ID: 115952.
[17] 哈尼克孜·图尔洪, 阿尔祖古丽·奥布力艾散, 吾热古丽·托合提麦麦提. 多维度强化康复护理在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中的应用与效果评价[J]. 临床医学进展, 2025, 15(7): 1809-1815.
[18] Kadıoğlu, M.B., Sezer, M. and Elbasan, B. (2024) Effects of Manual Therapy and Home Exercise Treatment on Pain, Stress, Sleep, and Life Quality in Patients with Bruxism: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Medicina, 60, Article No. 2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] 张慈伟. Survivin基因在白血病GC敏感型和GC耐药型细胞株中的表达差异及意义[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2010.
[20] 郭艳, 鲍莉, 纪猛, 吴月红. 多能干细胞治疗视网膜退行性疾病: 从实验室到临床转化的现状与挑战[J]. 浙江理工大学学报(自然科学), 2024, 51(1): 130-144.
[21] 李向月. 嗜酸乳杆菌NCFM沉默基因slpB的克隆表达及S-层蛋白结构与功能研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南京: 南京师范大学, 2018.