刑事涉案财物处置中案外人权利保障问题研究
Research on the Protection of the Rights of Third Parties in the Disposal of Property Involved in Criminal Cases
摘要: 刑事涉案财物处置作为刑事诉讼的关键环节,直接关涉公民财产权的保障。随着经济犯罪案件的激增,涉案财物范围不断扩大,因财物权属认定错误导致案外人合法财产被不当查控、没收的情形日益凸显。在司法实践中,案外人财产权在刑事涉案财物处置中屡遭侵害,反映出我国刑事诉讼长期存在“重人身、轻财产”的理念偏差。我国法律虽然针对案外人权利保护作出了相关规定,但其内容过于原则和模糊,操作性不强,并且较为分散。因此,为案外人提供贯穿刑事诉讼全流程的系统性保护方案,须立足于刑事诉讼全周期视角,剖析我国现行司法机制中案外人权益保障的薄弱环节,梳理司法实践中存在的问题及其成因,并借鉴国外相关制度的有益经验,最后从构建第三方司法审查机制、案外人参诉的庭审中心程序、三方结构的执行异议之诉等层面提出针对财产权保护问题的优化路径。通过推动财产权保障的诉讼化改革,以期为完善我国刑事涉案财物处置中案外人权益保护机制提供有益参考。
Abstract: The disposal of criminal case assets, as a key link in criminal proceedings, is directly related to the protection of citizens’ property rights. With the sharp increase in economic crime cases and the continuous expansion of the scope of involved assets, the situation where the legitimate property of third parties is improperly seized and confiscated due to incorrect determination of property rights has become increasingly prominent. In judicial practice, the property rights of third parties have been repeatedly infringed upon in the disposal of criminal case assets, reflecting the long-standing conceptual deviation of “valuing personal safety over property” in China’s criminal proceedings. Although Chinese laws have made relevant provisions for the protection of the rights of third parties, their content is overly general and vague, lacking strong operability and being rather scattered. Therefore, to provide a systematic protection plan for third parties throughout the entire criminal litigation process, it is necessary to base on the perspective of the entire criminal litigation cycle, analyze the weak links in the protection of the rights and interests of third parties in the current judicial mechanism of China, sort out the problems existing in judicial practice and their causes, and draw on the beneficial experiences of relevant foreign systems. Finally, optimization paths for the protection of property rights are proposed from the aspects of establishing a third-party judicial review mechanism, a trial center procedure with non-parties participating in the lawsuit, and a tripartite structure for execution objection lawsuits. By promoting the litigation-based transformation of property rights protection, it is expected to provide a useful reference for improving the protection mechanism of the rights and interests of third parties in the disposal of criminal case assets in China.
文章引用:吕晨冰. 刑事涉案财物处置中案外人权利保障问题研究[J]. 争议解决, 2025, 11(9): 154-163. https://doi.org/10.12677/ds.2025.119292

参考文献

[1] 姚莉. 刑事涉案财物处置程序的反思与改革[J]. 法学, 2024(11): 124-136.
[2] 汪海燕. 《刑事诉讼法》再修改与涉案财物处理程序的完善[J]. 政法论坛, 2025, 43(1): 101-114.
[3] 张胜斌, 燕凤, 阮元. 论刑事涉案执行中案外第三人的权利救济[M]//北京市犯罪学研究会. 犯罪学研究(第三辑). 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社, 2024: 724-733.
[4] 何姣. 刑事涉案财物处置中的案外人权益保障——以审执阶段案外人异议权保护为重点[J]. 人民司法, 2021(19): 21-26.
[5] 纪格非. 刑事涉案财物处置程序中的案外人权利保护[J]. 法学杂志, 2020, 41(8): 1-11.
[6] 陈卫东. 涉案财产处置程序的完善——以审前程序为视角的分析[J]. 法学杂志, 2020, 41(3): 40-52.
[7] 吴成杰. 刑事涉案财物的审查认定及处理[J]. 人民司法, 2014(13): 66-69.
[8] 李玉华. 刑事诉讼法修改与涉案财物制度改革[J]. 中国刑事法杂志, 2024(2): 92-106.
[9] 吴光升. 审前返还刑事涉案财物的若干问题探讨[J]. 中国刑事法杂志, 2012(1): 91-98.
[10] 李奋飞. 刑事诉讼案外人异议制度的规范阐释与困境反思[J]. 华东政法大学学报, 2021, 24(6): 45-56.
[11] 温小洁. 我国刑事涉案财物处理之完善——以公民财产权保障为视角[J]. 法律适用, 2017(13): 31-37.
[12] 李胥. 刑事诉讼案外人诉权保护的理论阐释与现实反思[J]. 东南法学, 2022(2): 142-169.
[13] 陈喆. 论刑事辩护中当事人的决策权[J]. 人权研究, 2025(29): 163.
[14] 张元鹏. 论刑事涉案财物处置中案外人的权利保障[J]. 法律适用, 2023(5): 61-70.
[15] 陈瑞华. 刑事对物之诉的初步研究[J]. 中国法学, 2019(1): 204-223.
[16] 韩波. 论涉案财物审理程序中案外人的参与权保障[J]. 法学杂志, 2020, 41(8): 12-22.
[17] 吴光升. 案外第三人定罪没收参与模式: 比较、反思与重构[J]. 中国刑事法杂志, 2015(4): 79-95.
[18] 蒋晓亮. 论我国刑事涉案财物执行中的案外人救济[J]. 法律适用, 2016(8): 82-87.