基于半解析方法的多分支水平井模型试井解释研究
Semi-Analytical Modeling for Pressure Transient Analysis of Multilateral Horizontal Well
摘要: 针对多分支水平井复杂结构渗流表征难题,本文提出一种基于线源离散与拉普拉斯变换的半解析试井模型。通过Newman乘积原理将任意构型的多分支井筒离散为有限线源段,结合拉普拉斯域叠加求解方法,建立了盒状储层中复杂分支结构的瞬态渗流数学模型。该模型突破传统点源方法的几何限制,能够实现对任意结构多分支水平井的建模求解。采用Starfest数值反演技术实现井底压力的高效求解,并以双分支井为例,识别出八个典型流动阶段。在此基础上,通过对储层基本参数和井筒基本参数的敏感性分析,总结了不同因素对流动阶段特征的影响规律。该模型为任意结构多分支井的试井解释与优化设计提供了普适性理论工具。
Abstract: The challenge of seepage characterization for complex structures of multi-branch horizontal wells is addressed in this paper through a semi-analytical well testing model based on line-source discretization and Laplace transform. Newman’s product principle enables the discretization of multi-branch wellbores with arbitrary configurations into finite line-source segments, which, combined with the superposition solution method in the Laplace domain, establishes a transient seepage mathematical model for complex branch structures in box-shaped reservoirs. This model overcomes the geometric limitations of traditional point-source methods, facilitating the modeling and solution of multi-branch horizontal wells with arbitrary configurations. The Stehfest numerical inversion technique ensures efficient calculation of bottom-hole pressure, and case studies on dual-branch wells identify eight typical flow stages. Sensitivity analyses of basic reservoir and wellbore parameters summarize the influence laws of different factors on flow stage characteristics. This model provides a universal theoretical tool for well testing interpretation and optimization design of multi-branch wells with arbitrary structures.
文章引用:刘玉龙. 基于半解析方法的多分支水平井模型试井解释研究[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2025, 47(3): 403-415. https://doi.org/10.12677/jogt.2025.473045

参考文献

[1] 周福建, 苏航, 梁星原, 等. 致密油储集层高效缝网改造与提高采收率一体化技术[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(5): 1007-1014.
[2] 李根生, 田守嶒, 张逸群. 空化射流钻径向井开采天然气水合物关键技术研究进展[J]. 石油科学通报, 2020, 5(3): 349-365.
[3] 孙焕泉, 蔡勋育, 胡德高, 等. 页岩气立体开发理论技术与实践——以四川盆地涪陵页岩气田为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2023, 50(3): 573-584.
[4] Gringarten, A.C. and Ramey, H.J. (1973) The Use of Source and Green’s Functions in Solving Unsteady-Flow Problems in Reservoirs. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 13, 285-296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Kuchuk, F.J. (1995) Well Testing and Interpretation for Horizontal Wells. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 47, 36-41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Karakas, M., Yokoyama, Y.M. and Arima, E.M. (1991) Well Test Analysis of a Well with Multiple Horizontal Drainholes. Middle East Oil Show, Bahrain, 16-19 November 1991, 715-721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Ouyang, L. and Aziz, K. (2001) A General Single-Phase Wellbore/Reservoir Coupling Model for Multilateral Wells. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 4, 327-335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 孔祥言, 徐献芝, 卢德唐. 分支水平井的样板曲线和试井分析[J]. 石油学报, 1997, 18(3): 98-104.
[9] 王丽娟. 多分支井试井解释模型和数值计算方法研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2011.
[10] 王丽娟, 吴小庆, 房国庆, 等. 多分支井试井模型及求解[J]. 西部探矿工程, 2012, 24(2): 97-98.
[11] 李树松. 水平井及多分支井的试井解释方法研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2006.
[12] 李树松, 陈伟, 段永刚, 等. 点源函数在水平井及多分支井试井理论中的应用[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2009, 31(1): 56-60+64.
[13] 李树松, 段永刚, 陈伟, 等. 压裂水平井的试井解释理论和方法[J]. 油气井测试, 2005, 14(5): 5-8.
[14] 李道伦, 杨景海, 闫术, 等. 致密油大规模多段压裂水平试井解释及外区渗透率对试井曲线的影响[J]. 地球科学, 2017, 42(8): 1324-1332.
[15] Rosa, A.J. and Carvalho, R.d.S. (1989) A Mathematical Model for Pressure Evaluation in an Infinite-Conductivity Horizontal Well. SPE Formation Evaluation, 4, 559-566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] 范玉平, 韩国庆, 杨长春. 鱼骨井产能预测及分支井形态优化[J]. 石油学报, 2006, 27(4): 101-104.
[17] 姚志良, 曹飞, 丁士东, 等. 分支井产能预测模型及分支形态优化[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2013, 20(3): 56-59.
[18] 王晓冬, 于国栋, 李治平. 复杂分支水平井产能研究[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2006(6): 729-733.
[19] 赵静, 赵泉. 低渗透分支井井网产能预测及参数敏感性分析[J]. 西南石油大学学报: 自然科学版, 2010, 32(1): 112-116.
[20] Yao, S., Zeng, F., Liu, H. and Zhao, G. (2012) A Semi-Analytical Model for Multi-Stage Fractured Horizontal Wells. SPE Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, 30 October-1 November 2012, 201-212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef