埋地燃气管道泄漏扩散分析研究
Research on Leakage and Diffusion Analysis of Buried Gas Pipeline
摘要: 针对实际埋地燃气管道泄漏时天然气在不同类型土壤(沙土、黏土颗粒)及复杂地下空间(存在其他市政管道)中的迁移扩散规律不明确,给实际天然气工程管理及维护造成很大困扰。利用室内实验,系统分析研究了泄漏流量、泄漏口方向、泄漏点与扩散管水平/垂直距离、土壤表面覆盖等因素对扩散行为的影响及特征。分析发现:泄漏流量是主要驱动因素,流量增大会显著提升扩散速度、浓度累积范围和最终浓度(远距离测点反应同步明显)。土壤孔隙率是扩散模式的主要驱动因素,沙土(小孔隙率)中天然气横向扩散范围更大,但浓度累积较慢;黏土颗粒(大孔隙率)中扩散速度快但影响范围小,浓度梯度大。土壤不同类型对泄漏口方向的影响差异很大,沙土中开口向下可加速扩散并扩大影响范围,而黏土中开口向下则抑制扩散能力。与此同时,管道水平距离增加会大幅降低天然气向其它市政管道扩散的速度和浓度累积量;地表覆盖会阻碍天然气向上扩散,迫使横向迁移范围扩大,增加进入邻近密闭空间的风险。研究结果为燃气泄漏事故的预防、监测及应急处置等提供了有效的科学依据。
Abstract: The uncertain migration and diffusion patterns of natural gas in various soil types (sand, clay particles) and complex underground environments (including the presence of other municipal pipelines) during actual buried gas pipeline leaks pose considerable challenges to the management, maintenance, and emergency response of natural gas engineering projects. Through indoor experiments, we systematically analyzed and studied the impact and characteristics of various factors on diffusion behavior, including leakage flow rate, leakage port orientation, horizontal/vertical distance between the leakage point and the diffusion tube, and soil surface coverage. Our analysis revealed that leakage flow rate is the primary driving factor, with increased flow rates significantly enhancing diffusion speed, concentration accumulation range, and ultimate concentration (with notable synchronization at remote measurement points). Soil porosity emerged as the key determinant of diffusion patterns, with natural gas in sandy soil (characterized by low porosity) exhibiting a broader lateral diffusion range but slower concentration accumulation, whereas in clay particles (with high porosity), the diffusion rate is swift but the impact range is limited, resulting in a steep concentration gradient. The influence of soil type on leakage port orientation varies significantly. In sandy soil, a downward-facing leakage port accelerates diffusion and expands the scope of influence, whereas in clay, a downward-facing port inhibits diffusion. Furthermore, an increase in the horizontal distance from the pipeline significantly reduces the speed and concentration accumulation of natural gas diffusion towards other municipal pipelines. Surface cover hinders upward diffusion of natural gas, forcing it to migrate laterally over a broader range and increasing the risk of entering adjacent enclosed spaces. The findings of this research provide a solid scientific basis for the prevention, monitoring, and emergency response to gas leakage accidents.
文章引用:陈龙. 埋地燃气管道泄漏扩散分析研究[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2025, 47(3): 416-425. https://doi.org/10.12677/jogt.2025.473046

参考文献

[1] Wang, X., Tan, Y., Zhang, T., Xiao, R., Yu, K. and Zhang, J. (2021) Numerical Study on the Diffusion Process of Pinhole Leakage of Natural Gas from Underground Pipelines to the Soil. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 87, Article 103792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] 魏苹, 张亮, 张聪. 燃气管线探测数据质量检查的程序化实现[J]. 科技创新与应用, 2025, 15(4): 152-155.
[3] 刘涛, 彭知军, 郑贺贺, 等. 地下燃气管道泄漏进入建(构)筑物灾害的预防[J]. 城市与减灾, 2024(5): 16-20.
[4] Wang, X., Hou, T., Gao, W., Yu, K., Zhang, T. and Tan, Y. (2024) Experimental Study on the Diffusion Process of Natural Gas from Buried Pipelines to Underground Confined Spaces. Natural Gas Industry B, 11, 603-615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 谢昱姝, 吴宗之, 吕良海, 等. 城市管道天然气在土壤中泄漏扩散实验研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2012, 8(4): 13-17.
[6] Zhu, J., Pan, J., Zhang, Y., Li, Y., Li, H., Feng, H., et al. (2023) Leakage and Diffusion Behavior of a Buried Pipeline of Hydrogen-Blended Natural Gas. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 48, 11592-11610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Zeng, F., Jiang, Z., Zheng, D., Si, M. and Wang, Y. (2023) Study on Numerical Simulation of Leakage and Diffusion Law of Parallel Buried Gas Pipelines in Tunnels. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 177, 258-277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Parvini, M. and Gharagouzlou, E. (2015) Gas Leakage Consequence Modeling for Buried Gas Pipelines. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 37, 110-118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Sun, B., Zhang, P., Guo, L., et al. (2021) Feasibility Study of Detecting Gas Leakage in Buried Pipeline Based on Resistivity Method. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 565, Article 012008.
[10] Zhang, P., Liu, C., Yao, D., Ou, Y. and Tian, Y. (2022) Multi-Physical Field Joint Monitoring of Buried Gas Pipeline Leakage Based on BOFDA. Measurement Science and Technology, 33, Article 105202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Lin, T., Wang, Z., Hu, B., Ji, Y. and Liang, X. (2024) Simulation and Experimental Study of Buried Natural Gas Pipeline Leak Detection Based on Sound Source Characteristics. Thermal Science, 28, 101-113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Zhao, A., Ma, Y., Zhang, T., Zhang, X. and Yuan, H. (2024) Basic Acoustic Wave Time-Frequency Parameters of Buried Gas Pipeline Leakage. Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, 15, 1-12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Cho, Y., Smits, K.M., Steadman, N.L., Ulrich, B.A., Bell, C.S. and Zimmerle, D.J. (2022) A Closer Look at Underground Natural Gas Pipeline Leaks across the United States. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 10, Article 00095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Gao, B., Mitton, M.K., Bell, C., Zimmerle, D., Deepagoda, T.K.K.C., Hecobian, A., et al. (2021) Study of Methane Migration in the Shallow Subsurface from a Gas Pipe Leak. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 9, Article 00008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Wang, Z., Liu, Y., Liang, H., Xu, Z., Bu, F., Zhang, J., et al. (2022) Leakage Analysis and Hazardous Boundary Determination of Buried Gas Pipeline Considering Underground Adjacent Confined Space. Energies, 15, Article 6859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Guo, J., Zhang, Y., Li, Y., Zhang, X., Zheng, J., Shi, H., et al. (2024) Model Experimental Study on the Mechanism of Collapse Induced by Leakage of Underground Pipeline. Scientific Reports, 14, Article No. 17717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]