自动驾驶车辆肇事刑事责任的认定与归责体系完善
The Determination of Criminal Responsibility for Self-Driving Vehicles and the Improvement of the Liability System
摘要: 随着自动驾驶技术的发展,其交通肇事的刑事责任认定成为重要法律问题。本文通过分析自动驾驶肇事刑事责任的认定困境,从生产者、使用者和第三方等维度解析刑事责任划分,并提出“动态归责理论”,即责任权重并非固定不变,应根据自动驾驶层级、事故场景中各主体的实际控制力表现来进行动态调整,更精准地体现“权责随控制力变化而适配”的核心主张,以在保障技术发展与维护公共安全之间寻求平衡。
Abstract: With the development of autonomous driving technology, the determination of criminal responsibility for traffic accidents has become an important legal issue. This article analyzes the dilemma of determining criminal responsibility for autonomous driving accidents, and analyzes the division of criminal responsibility from the dimensions of producers, users, and third parties. It proposes the “dynamic attribution theory”, which means that the weight of responsibility is not fixed and should be dynamically adjusted based on the actual control performance of each subject in the autonomous driving hierarchy and accident scenario, more accurately reflecting the core proposition of “rights and responsibilities adapt to changes in control”, in order to seek a balance between ensuring technological development and maintaining public safety.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
廖兴存. 无人驾驶汽车交通肇事过失刑事责任论纲[J]. 湖南社会科学, 2021(3): 122-130.
|
|
[2]
|
蔡仙. 自动驾驶中过失犯归责体系的展开[J]. 比较法研究, 2023(4): 65-81.
|
|
[3]
|
程凡卿. 自动驾驶刑事风险研究——刑事追责的困境与对策[J]. 比较法研究, 2022(5): 118-130.
|
|
[4]
|
袁彬, 徐永伟. “人机共驾”模式下交通肇事罪的适用困境及突围[J]. 广西大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019, 41(5): 76-84.
|
|
[5]
|
冯文杰. 人工智能刑法研究的法益保护观及其适用[J]. 理论月刊, 2025(6): 129-141+160.
|
|
[6]
|
彭文华. 自动驾驶车辆犯罪的注意义务[J]. 政治与法律, 2018(5): 86-99.
|