特征混淆对记忆的影响:虚假记忆还是错误记忆?
The Effect of Feature Confusion on Memory: False Memory or Misremember?
DOI: 10.12677/ap.2025.159534, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 刘永华:柳州职业技术大学通识教育学院,广西 柳州
关键词: 虚假记忆错误记忆记忆错误特征混淆False Memory Misremember Memory Errors Feature Confusion
摘要: 研究以人物图片作为实验材料,参照DRM范式通过特征混淆诱发虚假记忆(虚报)和错误记忆(漏报)两种记忆错误,比较二者的加工特征。实验一通过相似组人物图片的换脸处理,结果发现“形似实非”造成相似性特征混淆的人物图片诱发的虚假再认率显著高于无关刺激图,虚假记忆效果显著,且虚假再认的反应时要显著长于真实再认。实验二通过相似组人物的简单化妆处理,结果发现“形异实同”造成显著特征混淆的人物图片错误再认率显著高于无关刺激图,错误记忆效应显著,且错误再认的反应时要显著长于真实再认。实验结果说明,两种记忆错误具有真实存在性,相似性特征混淆可诱发高虚假记忆,而显著性特征混淆可诱发高错误记忆,且特征混淆会使个体花更长的时间进行特征搜索与比较。
Abstract: This study uses character pictures as experimental materials, and compares the processing characteristics of two types of memory errors, false memory (commission error) and Misremember (omission error) through feature confusion with reference to the DRM paradigm. Experiment 1 showed that the false re-recognition rate induced by the character pictures caused by the confusion of similar characteristics caused by “similar appearance and real non-appearance” was significantly higher than that of the unrelated stimulus map, and the false memory effect was significant, and the response of false re-recognition was significantly longer than that of real re-recognition. Experiment 2 showed that the miss re-recognition rate of the character pictures caused by the confusion of significant features caused by “similar shapes and real similarities” was significantly higher than that of the unrelated stimulus images, and the misremember effect was significant, and the reaction of miss re-recognition was significantly longer than that of real re-recognition. The experimental results show that the two types of memory errors have real existence, similar feature confusion can induce high false memory, while salient feature confusion can induce high misremember, and feature confusion will make individuals spend a longer time searching and comparing features.
文章引用:刘永华 (2025). 特征混淆对记忆的影响:虚假记忆还是错误记忆?. 心理学进展, 15(9), 441-449. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2025.159534

参考文献

[1] 郭秀艳, 周楚, 周梅花(2004). 错误记忆影响因素的实验研究. 应用心理学, (1), 3-8.
[2] 毛伟宾(2012). 跨视听通道的相继错误记忆效应. 心理科学, 35(3), 574-580.
[3] 曲折, 丁玉珑(2010). 汉字语音关联对错误记忆的影响. 心理学报, 42(2), 193-199.
[4] 曲折, 刘优, 毕耀华(2010). 汉字字形关联对错误记忆的影响. 应用心理学, 16(2), 146-153.
[5] 任国防, 王金娥, 张庆林(2009). “学习-再认”范式下汉字错误记忆的ERP效应. 心理科学, 32(5), 1127-1130.
[6] 隋雪, 李平平, 张晓利(2012). 熟悉面孔与陌生面孔识别的差异. 心理科学, 35(6), 1349-1352.
[7] 汪亚珉, 黄雅梅(2011). 面孔识别中的构形加工与特征加工. 心理科学进展, 19(8), 1126-1137.
[8] 韦义平(2012). 虚假记忆的陌生反应:一项眼动追踪研究. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 48(4), 96-99.
[9] 张峻瑜, 李颖, 张志谋, 杨硕, 尹宁(2022). 基于脑电信号分析的正确记忆与错误记忆的差异性. 科学技术与工程, 22(16), 6430-6441.
[10] 张磊, 王龙, 刘洪广(2013). 证人的目击面孔心理重建及认知检测. 中国司法鉴定, (5), 40-44.
[11] Arndt, J., & Hirshman, E. (1998). True and False Recognition in MINERVA2: Explanations from a Global Matching Perspective. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 371-391.[CrossRef
[12] Brainerd, C. J., Wright, R., Reyna, V. F., & Mojardin, A. H. (2001). Conjoint Recognition and Phantom Recollection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 307-327.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Deese, J. (1959). On the Prediction of Occurrence of Particular Verbal Intrusions in Immediate Recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 17-22.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Ellis, H. D., Shepherd, J. W., & Davies, G. M. (1979). Identification of Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces from Internal and External Features: Some Implications for Theories of Face Recognition. Perception, 8, 431-439.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Endl, W., Walla, P., Lindinger, G., Deecke, L., & Lang, W. (1999). Event-Related Potential Correlates of False Recognitions of Faces. Neuroscience Letters, 265, 115-118.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Henkel, L. A. (2004). Erroneous Memories Arising from Repeated Attempts to Remember. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 26-46.[CrossRef
[17] Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source Monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] McDermott, K. B., & Watson, J. M. (2001). The Rise and Fall of False Recall: The Impact of Presentation Duration. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 160-176.[CrossRef
[19] Pezdek, K., & Lam, S. (2007). What Research Paradigms Have Cognitive Psychologists Used to Study “False Memory,” and What Are the Implications of These Choices? Consciousness and Cognition, 16, 2-17.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Reinitz, M. T., Lammers, W. J., & Cochran, A. P. (1992). Memory-Conjunction Errors: Miscombination of Stored Stimulus Features Can Produce Illusions of Memory. Memory & Cognition, 20, 1-11.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating False Memories: Remembering Words Not Presented in Lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 803-814.[CrossRef
[22] Schacter, D. L., & Addis, D. R. (2007). The Ghosts of Past and Future: The Ghosts of Past and Future. Nature, 445, 27-27.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Schacter, D. L., Buckner, R. L., Koutstaal, W., Dale, A. M., & Rosen, B. R. (1997). Late Onset of Anterior Prefrontal Activity during True and False Recognition: An Event-Related Fmri Study. NeuroImage, 6, 259-269.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Schacter, D. L., Chiao, J. Y., & Mitchell, J. P. (2003). The Seven Sins of Memory: Implications for Self. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1001, 226-239.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Turney, I. C., & Dennis, N. A. (2017). Elucidating the Neural Correlates of Related False Memories Using a Systematic Measure of Perceptual Relatedness. NeuroImage, 146, 940-950.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Wade, K. A., Sharman, S. J., Garry, M., Memon, A., Mazzoni, G., Merckelbach, H. et al. (2007). False Claims about False Memory Research. Consciousness and Cognition, 16, 18-28.[CrossRef] [PubMed]