数据库营销的隐私权边界与合规路径
Privacy Boundaries and Compliance Paths in Database Marketing
摘要: 数据库营销凭借数据技术实现精准化运营,成为数字经济时代的重要营销范式,但也让隐私权保护与数据价值利用的矛盾日益凸显。本文围绕数据库营销中隐私权边界的动态界定与合规路径展开研究,解析了隐私权边界在理论上的争议(控制说、合理预期说、风险预防说)和立法层面的模糊性,揭示了司法实践中“场景依赖”的裁判逻辑。通过场景化分析数据收集、处理、共享、触达全流程的隐私风险,指出用户敏感度、企业透明度、技术脱敏水平是影响边界感知的关键因素。对比欧盟、美国、日韩及我国的合规实践,剖析了过度采集、默认同意陷阱、跨境传输违规等典型问题及根源,最终提出多维度合规路径:法律层面细化场景化规则与完善权利救济,企业层面构建“数据治理–用户权利–技术保障”体系,行业与社会层面强化自律与监督协同。研究为平衡数据商业价值与隐私保护提供了理论框架与实践指引,助力数据库营销的合规化与可持续发展。
Abstract: Database marketing, leveraging data technologies to achieve precise operations, has become a crucial marketing paradigm in the digital economy era. However, it has increasingly highlighted the contradiction between privacy protection and the utilization of data value. This paper focuses on the dynamic definition of privacy boundaries and compliance paths in database marketing, analyzing theoretical controversies over privacy boundaries (including the control theory, reasonable expectation theory, and risk prevention theory) as well as legislative ambiguities. It also reveals the “context-dependent” judicial logic in judicial practice. Through a scenario-based analysis of privacy risks throughout the entire process of data collection, processing, sharing, and outreach, the paper identifies user sensitivity, corporate transparency, and technical desensitization levels as key factors influencing the perception of boundaries. By comparing compliance practices in the European Union, the United States, Japan, South Korea, and China, it examines typical issues such as excessive data collection, default consent traps, and cross-border transmission violations, along with their root causes. Finally, it proposes multi-dimensional compliance paths: refining scenario-specific rules and improving rights remedies at the legal level; building a “data governance-user rights-technical guarantee” system at the corporate level; and strengthening self-regulation and supervisory collaboration at the industry and social levels. This research provides a theoretical framework and practical guidance for balancing the commercial value of data and privacy protection, facilitating the compliance and sustainable development of database marketing.
文章引用:王涛. 数据库营销的隐私权边界与合规路径[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(9): 1718-1725. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.1493097

参考文献

[1] 王利明. 隐私权概念的再界定[J]. 法学家, 2012(1): 108-120, 178.
[2] 蔡奕端. 互联网精准营销中的个人信息保护研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 西南政法大学, 2018.
[3] 胡云清, 曾菊兵, 刘生根. 世纪营销策略——互联网络数据库营销[J]. 北京工商大学学报(社会科学版), 2002, 17(2): 1-4
[4] 徐健. 浅析电子商务环境下的数据库营销[J]. 商, 2015(4): 94
[5] 王彤. 拥抱还是拒绝——大数据环境下精准营销的隐私问题探讨[J]. 视听, 2017(10): 104-105.
[6] 赵爱琴, 赵为, 衡风玲. 论数据库营销[J]. 北京工业大学学报, 1998, 24(S1): 43-46
[7] 侯乐乐, 崔娜, 白向伟. 关于网络数据库营销若干问题的探讨[J]. 商场现代化, 2015(14): 58.
[8] 谢贵荣, 王晖. 浅论数据库营销[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2003, 24(12): 38-40.
[9] 王菲. 互联网精准营销的隐私权保护: 法律、市场、技术[J]. 国际新闻界, 2011, 33(12): 90-95.
[10] 俞立根, 顾理平. “隐私已死”与技术社会的想象式抵抗[J]. 新闻记者, 2022(7): 58-70.
[11] 彭宁波. 国内数据隐私保护研究综述[J]. 图书馆, 2021(11): 69-75.
[12] 王苑. 数据权力视野下个人信息保护的趋向——以个人信息保护与隐私权的分立为中心[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 35(1): 45-57.
[13] 蒋博涵. 论我国消费者数据治理的精巧规制[J]. 财经理论与实践, 2025, 46(3): 148-154.
[14] 郭明瑞, 娄逸骅. 算法消费者信息茧房的治理困境与制度因应[J]. 深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2025, 42(4): 86-95.
[15] 武西锋. 政策治理与法律治理——我国数据治理模式的反思与完善[J]. 北方法学, 2025, 19(4): 146-160.