考虑消费者行为的电子商务退货决策研究
Research on E-Commerce Return Decision-Making Considering Consumer Behavior
DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2025.1493099, PDF,   
作者: 张佳楠, 刘玲丽*:武汉科技大学汽车与交通工程学院,湖北 武汉
关键词: 电子商务退货率Stackelberg博弈退货政策E-Commerce Return Rate Stackelberg Game Return Policy
摘要: 当前电子商务行业发展迅猛,市场逐渐饱和且资源有限,平台与商家为争夺有限市场份额、增强自身竞争力,纷纷推行过度宽松的退货政策——这类政策虽短期内刺激了消费需求,却也引发了大量机会主义退货行为,导致退货率持续高升。高退货率不仅提高了电商平台和商家的运营成本,增加消费者的决策成本,还通过退货物流环节的运输能耗与包装废弃物,加剧环境污染,因此需建立多方协同治理机制。本研究以Stackelberg博弈理论为基础,构建政府主导下的三方动态博弈模型,聚焦机会主义消费者行为占比差异下的多主体决策互动机制,旨在探讨政府通过设立环保奖惩机制,对电商商家及消费者行为的调节作用,进而优化退货政策,为促进电子商务的可持续发展提供理论支撑与实践路径。
Abstract: The current e-commerce industry is experiencing rapid development, yet the market is gradually becoming saturated with limited resources. To compete for market share and enhance their competitiveness, platforms and merchants are widely adopting excessively lenient return policies. While such policies may stimulate consumer demand in the short term, they have also triggered a large volume of opportunistic returns, leading to persistently high return rates. High return rates not only increase operational costs for e-commerce platforms and merchants, as well as decision-making costs for consumers, but also exacerbate environmental pollution through transportation energy consumption and packaging waste generated during the return logistics process. Consequently, establishing a multi-party collaborative governance mechanism is imperative. Based on Stackelberg game theory, this study constructs a tripartite dynamic game model under government leadership, focusing on the decision-making interactions among multiple entities under varying proportions of opportunistic consumer behavior. It aims to explore how the government, by implementing environmental protection incentives and penalties, can regulate the behavior of e-commerce merchants and consumers, thereby optimizing return policies. The findings provide theoretical and practical guidance for promoting the sustainable development of e-commerce.
文章引用:张佳楠, 刘玲丽. 考虑消费者行为的电子商务退货决策研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(9): 1737-1746. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.1493099

参考文献

[1] 网经社电子商务研究中心. 2024年度中国网络零售市场数据报告[EB/OL].
https://www.100ec.cn/zt/2024lsbg/, 2025-06-10.
[2] 项艺. 高退货率下的电商生态平衡点[J]. 检察风云, 2025(14): 42-43.
[3] 刘涵秋, 杨林岩. 退货政策宽松度对消费者网购意愿的影响——基于SOR模型的有调节双中介效应分析[J]. 西部论坛, 2024, 34(1): 111-124.
[4] 郝皓, 许依, 许肇然, 等. 网络购物机会主义退货行为[J]. 上海第二工业大学学报, 2023, 40(4): 364-370.
[5] Shang, G., Ghosh, B.P. and Galbreth, M.R. (2017) Optimal Retail Return Policies with Wardrobing. Production and Operations Management, 26, 1315-1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 陆媛媛, 梁雅琪, 刘佳雨. 竞争性零售商在不同退货政策下的博弈模型研究[J]. 通化师范学院学报, 2025, 46(4): 27-33.
[7] 赵晓敏, 胡淑慧. 网购环境下在线零售商的退货运费承担策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(1): 53-62.
[8] 窦茂伟, 张宝明. 电商平台退货的动态博弈分析[J]. 电子商务, 2019(6): 47-48.
[9] 邱优. 考虑环境税的竞争闭环供应链再制造决策与渠道结构选择研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长沙: 中南大学, 2021.
[10] 韩小雅, 杨鑫源, 张会臣. 碳交易政策下绿色平台供应链系统优化策略研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2025, 45(2): 398-412.