1960~2023年新疆塔城地区汛期极端降水指数时空变化特征及其对大气环流因子的响应
Temporal and Spatial Variation Characteristics and Its Response to Atmospheric Circulation Factors of Extreme Precipitation Index in Flood Season in Tacheng Area of Xinjiang from 1960 to 2023
DOI: 10.12677/ccrl.2025.145112, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 井立红, 曾春蕾*, 扎 璐:新疆塔城地区气象局,新疆 塔城;杨 霰:新疆气象局科技服务中心,新疆 乌鲁木齐;井立军:沙湾市气象局,新疆 沙湾
关键词: 汛期极端降水指数时空变化特征大气环流因子响应Extreme Precipitation Index in Flood Season Temporal and Spatial Variation Characteristics Atmospheric Circulation Factor Respond
摘要: 利用近64年(1960~2023年)新疆塔城地区7个气象观测站汛期(5~9月)降水资料,采用世界气象组织推荐的11个极端降水指数,分别讨论了其时空变化特征,探讨了其对大气环流因子的响应,结果表明:① 近64a塔城地区汛期极端降水指数除CDD和CDW呈不显著减少趋势外,其余各极端降水指数均呈不显著增多趋势。② 7站各极端降水指数变化趋势差异较大,其中RX1day、R50仅托里以1.16 mm/10a、0.29 d/10a的速率显著增多,R20仅额敏以0.22 d/10a的速率显著增多,CDD仅裕民、乌苏以−0.17 d/10a、−0.20 d/10a的速率显著减少。③ 三个区域中RX1day、R50盆地和南部不显著增多,中部不显著减少,RX5day、R95P、PRCPFOT三个区域均不显著增多,R10、R20、R99P盆地及中部不显著增多,南部不显著减少,SDII盆地不显著增多,南部及中部不显著减少,CDD盆地及南部不显著减少,中部不显著增多,CWD中部及南部不显著增多,盆地不显著减少。④ 对塔城地区RX5day、SDII、R20、R50、PRCPFOT影响较大的大气环流因子是欧亚纬向环流、西太平洋副高北界位置指数、印度副高面积指数、西太平洋副高面积指数、东太平洋副高面积指数、北美副高面积指数、印缅槽强度指数、北非–大西洋–北美副高面积指数,当上述大气环流因子出现且指数较大(正值)时,则有利于塔城地区汛期上述极端降水指数增多,反之,则减少。⑤ 对单站RX1day、RX5day、SDII、R20、R50、CDD、CWD、R95P影响较大的大气环流因子是北美副高面积指数、西太平洋副高面积指数、印度副高面积指数、东太平洋副高面积指数、北非–大西洋–北美副高面积指数、印缅槽强度指数、印度副高北界位置指数、西太平洋副高北界位置指数、西太平洋副高西伸脊点、北非副高脊线位置指数、北非–北大西洋–北美副高脊线位置指数,当上述大气环流因子出现指数较大(正值)时,则有利于单站极端降水指数增多,反之,则减少。⑥ 对盆地和南部RX1day、RX5day、SDII、R50、R95P、R99P影响较大的大气环流因子是印缅槽强度指数、北非–大西洋–北美副高面积指数、印度副高面积指数、西太平洋副高面积指数、东太平洋副高面积指数、北美副高面积指数、印度副高北界位置指数,当上述大气环流因子出现指数较大(正值)时,则有利于盆地或南部汛期上述极端降水指数增多,反之,则减少。
Abstract: Based on the precipitation data of seven meteorological observation stations in flood season (May to September) in recent 64 years (1960~2023), the temporal and spatial variation characteristics of 11 extreme precipitation indexes recommended by the World Meteorological Organization were discussed, and the corresponding atmospheric circulation factors were analyzed. The results showed that ① the extreme precipitation indexes in flood season in Tacheng area in recent 64 years showed no significant decreasing trend, except CDD and CDW. ② The trends in extreme precipitation indices vary considerably across the seven stations; RX1day and R50 increase significantly only in the Tuoli at a rate of 1.16 mm/10a, 0.29 d/10a; R20 increases significantly only in the Emin at a rate of 0.22 d/10a; CDD decreases significantly only in the Yumin and Wusu at rates −0.17 d/10a, −0.20 d/10a respectively. ③ Among the three regions RX1day and R50 show non-significant increases in the basin and southern region, and non-significant decreases in the central region. RX5day, R95P, and PRCPTOT show non-significant increases in all three regions. R10, R20, and R99P show non-significant increases in the basin and central region, and non-significant decreases in the southern region. SDII shows a non-significant increase in the basin and non-significant decreases in the southern and central regions. CDD shows non-significant decreases in the basin and southern region, and a non-significant increase in the central region. CWD shows non-significant increases in the central and southern regions, and a non-significant decrease in the basin. ④ The atmospheric circulation factors that have great influence on RX5day, SDII, R20, R50 and PRCPFOT in Tacheng area are Eurasian zonal circulation, northern boundary position index of western Pacific subtropical high, Indian subtropical high area index, western Pacific subtropical high area index, eastern Pacific subtropical high area index, North America subtropical high area index, Indo-Myanmar trough intensity index and North Africa-Atlantic-North America subtropical high area index. When the above atmospheric circulation factors appear and the index is large. ⑤ The atmospheric circulation factors that have great influence on RXDAY, RXDAY, SDII, R20, R50, CDD, CWD and R95P of single station are North American subtropical high area index, western Pacific subtropical high area index, Indian subtropical high area index, eastern Pacific subtropical high area index, North Africa-Atlantic-North America subtropical high area index, Indo-Myanmar trough intensity index, northern boundary position index of Indian subtropical high and western Pacific subtropical high. The western extension ridge point of the western Pacific subtropical high, the position index of the north African subtropical high ridge line and the position index of the north African-North Atlantic-North American subtropical high ridge line, when the above atmospheric circulation factors appear and the index is large (positive), are beneficial to the increase of the single-station extreme precipitation index, and vice versa. ⑥ The atmospheric circulation factors that have a considerable influence on RX1day, RX5day, SDII, R50, R95P, and R99P in the basin and southern region include the Indian-Burmese Trough Intensity Index, North Africa-Atlantic-North American Subtropical High Area Index, Indian Subtropical High Area Index, Western Pacific Subtropical High Area Index, Eastern Pacific Subtropical High Area Index, North American Subtropical High Area Index, and the Northern Boundary Position Index of the Indian Subtropical High. When these atmospheric circulation factors exhibit higher index values (positive anomalies), they are conducive to an increase in the basin or southern region during the flood season. Conversely, lower index values (negative anomalies) are associated with a decrease in these indices.
文章引用:井立红, 曾春蕾, 扎璐, 杨霰, 井立军. 1960~2023年新疆塔城地区汛期极端降水指数时空变化特征及其对大气环流因子的响应[J]. 气候变化研究快报, 2025, 14(5): 1124-1136. https://doi.org/10.12677/ccrl.2025.145112

参考文献

[1] 江晓菲, 李伟, 游庆龙. 中国未来极端气温变化的概率预估及其不确定性[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2018, 14(3): 228-236.
[2] 王闪闪, 王素萍, 冯建英. 2015年全国干旱状况及其影响与成因[J]. 干旱气象, 2016, 34(2): 382-389.
[3] 胡彩虹, 王纪军, 柴晓玲, 等. 气候变化对黄河流域径流变化及其可能影响研究进展[J]. 气象与环境科学, 2013, 36(2): 57-65.
[4] 许朗, 李海艳, 刘爱军. 我国近年旱情演变及其对农业造成的影响[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2012, 26(7): 53-56.
[5] 周波涛, 钱进. IPCC AR6报告解读: 极端天气气候事件变化[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2021, 17(6): 713-718.
[6] 高涛, 谢立安. 近50年来中国极端降水趋势与物理成因研究综述[J]. 地球科学进展, 2014, 29(5): 577-589.
[7] 孙建奇, 敖娟. 中国冬季降水和极端降水对变暖的响应[J]. 科学通报, 2013, 58(8): 674-679.
[8] 王苗, 郭品文, 邬昀. 中国东部极端降水变化特征及其与大气稳定度的关系[J]. 大气科学学报, 2014, 37(1): 47-56.
[9] 曹祥会, 龙怀玉, 张继宗. 等. 河北省主要极端气候指数的时空变化特征[J]. 中国农业气象, 2015, 36(3): 245-253.
[10] 杜亮亮, 周雪英, 赵有谱. 等. 河北邯郸地区极端降水指数气候特征及其与降水量、气温的关系[J]. 干旱气象, 2017, 35(6): 968-974.
[11] 施雅风, 沈永平, 胡汝骥. 西北气候由暖干向暖湿转型的信号、影响和前景初步研究[J]. 冰川冻土, 2002, 24(3): 219-226.
[12] 邓子风, 张家宝. 新疆降水概论[M]. 北京: 气象出版社, 1985: 15.
[13] 史玉光, 孙照渤, 杨青. 新疆区域面雨量分布特征及其变化规律[J]. 应用气象, 2008, 19(3): 326-332.
[14] 毛炜峄, 江远安, 李江风. 新疆北部的降水量线性变化趋势特征分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2006, 29(6): 797-802.
[15] 姜逢清, 胡汝骥. 近50年来新疆气候变化与洪、旱灾害扩大化[J]. 中国沙漠, 2004, 24(1): 35-40.
[16] 袁玉江, 何清, 穆贵金. 天山山区近40年夏季降水变化及与南北疆的比较[J]. 冰川冻土, 2003, 25(3): 331-335.
[17] 吴秀兰, 张太西, 王慧等. 1961-2017年新疆区域气候变化特征分析[J]. 沙漠与绿洲气象, 2020, 14(4): 27-34.
[18] 李佳秀, 杜春丽, 杜世飞, 等. 新疆极端降水事件时空变化及趋势预测[J]. 干旱区研究, 2015, 32(6): 1103-1112.
[19] 努尔比亚·吐尼牙孜, 姚俊强, 阿依努尔·买买提吐逊, 米日古丽·米吉提, 等. 1961-2021年塔里木盆地极端降水指数时空变化特征[J]. 沙漠与绿洲气象, 2024, 18(5): 25-34.
[20] 井立红, 魏小亚, 高婧, 等. 近50a新疆塔城地区冷季降水变化特征分析[J]. 干旱气象, 2012, 30(1): 39-44.
[21] 毛炜峄. 用前期大气环流指数预测新疆北部夏季降水的探讨[J]. 气象, 2009, 35(6): 82-89.