桂西北岩溶地区中国特有植物任豆种子性状差异及影响因素分析
Analysis of Differences in Seed Traits and Influencing Factors of Chinese Endemic Plant Zenia insignis Chun in Karst Areas of Northwest Guangxi
DOI: 10.12677/wjf.2025.144065, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 马秋妮, 覃勇荣*, 刘旭辉*, 罗春宇, 苏黎颖:河池学院化学与生物工程学院,广西 河池;邓慧莲:河池学院化学与生物工程学院,广西 河池;广西师范大学生命科学学院,广西 桂林
关键词: 桂西北岩溶地区中国特有植物任豆种子性状差异 Northwest Guangxi Karst Area Chinese Endemic Plants Zenia insignis Seeds Trait Differences
摘要: 为说明桂西北岩溶地区任豆种子的性状差异及其影响因素,观测了不同种源任豆种子的长度、宽度、厚度、百粒质量、长厚比、长宽比6个表型性状,并对不同种源地土壤基本理化特性及气候地理条件与任豆种子表型性状的相关性进行比较分析。结果表明:1) 桂西北岩溶地区不同种源任豆种子的表型性状均有极显著差异;2) 任豆种子表型性状与土壤理化因子有一定的相关性,土壤有机质含量和碱解氮含量是影响任豆种子表型性状的重要因素,但土壤理化特性不是影响任豆种子表型性状的关键因素;3) 气候地理因子对任豆种子表型性状有一定的影响,任豆种子厚度与海拔高度呈显著正相关,与其余气候地理因子具有一定相关性,但不显著。由此可见,不同种源任豆种子表型性状的差异,是遗传因子和多种环境因子相互作用的结果,但主要还是由其遗传因子所决定。
Abstract: In order to explain the differences in the characteristics and influencing factors of Zenia insignis seeds in the karst areas of northwest Guangxi, six phenotypic traits of Z. insignis seeds from different provenances, including length, width, thickness, hundred seed weight, length to thickness ratio, and length to width ratio, were observed. A comparative analysis was conducted on the correlation between the basic physicochemical characteristics of soil and climatic and geographical conditions in different provenances areas and the phenotypic traits of Z. insignis seeds. The results showed that: 1) there were significant differences in the phenotypic traits of Z. insignis seeds from different provenances in the karst areas of northwest Guangxi; 2) There is a certain correlation between the phenotypic traits of Z. insignis seeds and soil physicochemical factors. The content of soil organic matter and alkaline nitrogen are important factors affecting the phenotypic traits of Z. insignis seeds, but soil physicochemical characteristics are not the key factors affecting the phenotypic traits of Z. insignis seeds; 3) Climate geographical factors have a certain impact on the phenotypic traits of Z. insignis seeds. The thickness of Z. insignis seed is significantly positively correlated with altitude, and has a certain correlation with other climate geographical factors, but not significantly. It can be seen that the differences in phenotypic traits of Z. insignis seeds from different provenances are the result of the interaction between genetic factors and multiple environmental factors, but mainly determined by their genetic factors.
文章引用:马秋妮, 邓慧莲, 覃勇荣, 刘旭辉, 罗春宇, 苏黎颖. 桂西北岩溶地区中国特有植物任豆种子性状差异及影响因素分析[J]. 林业世界, 2025, 14(4): 538-552. https://doi.org/10.12677/wjf.2025.144065

参考文献

[1] 敖惠修, 何道泉, 张祝平, 等. 广东石灰岩地区的任豆群落[J]. 热带地理, 1997, 17(3): 275-276+278-282.
[2] 李茂, 邓伦秀, 潘德权, 等. 梵净山自然保护区任豆群落研究[J]. 浙江林业科技, 2011, 31(5): 6-9.
[3] 农友, 卢立华, 贾宏炎, 等. 桂西南岩溶区不同恢复模式群落生物量及林下植物多样性[J]. 林业科学研究, 2017, 30(2): 200-205.
[4] Zhang, Z., Zhang, J., Xu, G., Zhou, L. and Li, Y. (2018) Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Improve the Growth and Drought Tolerance of Zenia Insignis Seedlings under Drought Stress. New Forests, 50, 593-604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 蒋光敏, 岑忠用, 陈燕师, 等. 喀斯特地区造林先锋树种任豆种子萌发特性研究[J]. 种子, 2008, 27(12): 15-21.
[6] 何小勇, 赵思东, 柳新红, 等. 翅荚木的天然分布与引种栽培[J]. 浙江林业科技, 2006(5): 61-65.
[7] Zhao, X., Liu, J., Xia, X., Chu, J., Wei, Y., Shi, S., et al. (2013) The Evaluation of Heavy Metal Accumulation and Application of a Comprehensive Bio-Concentration Index for Woody Species on Contaminated Sites in Hunan, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 21, 5076-5085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] 柳新红, 何小勇, 袁德义, 等. 翅荚木地理种源苗期遗传性状变异[J]. 林业科学研究, 2007, 20(6): 814-819.
[9] 覃勇荣, 白新高, 刘旭辉. 桂西北岩溶地区不同植被土壤养分及微生物生理类群数量的季节变化[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2019, 47(24): 273-280.
[10] 林玮, 周鹏, 周祥斌, 等. 任豆种源种子性状地理变异研究[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2016, 37(4): 69-74.
[11] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 第三版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2018.
[12] Han, H., Li, S., Gan, X. and Zhang, X. (2017) Phenotypic Diversity in Natural Populations of an Endangered Plant Tetracentron sinense. Botanical Sciences, 95, 283-294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Li, C., Song, L., Zhu, Y., Zhai, Y. and Wang, Q. (2017) Genetic Diversity Assessment of Upland Cotton Variety Resources in China Based on Phenotype Traits and Molecular Markers. Crop Science, 57, 290-301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] 潘映红. 论植物表型组和植物表型组学的概念与范畴[J]. 作物学报, 2015, 41(2): 175-186.
[15] Kaviriri, D.K., Zhang, Q., Zhang, X., Jiang, L., Zhang, J., Wang, J., et al. (2020) Phenotypic Variability and Genetic Diversity in a Pinus koraiensis Clonal Trial in Northeastern China. Genes, 11, Article No. 673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Langerhans, R.B., Chapman, L.J. and Dewitt, T.J. (2007) Complex Phenotype-Environment Associations Revealed in an East African Cyprinid. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 20, 1171-1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Motlhaodi, T., Geleta, M., Chite, S., Fatih, M., Ortiz, R. and Bryngelsson, T. (2016) Genetic Diversity in Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] Germplasm from Southern Africa as Revealed by Microsatellite Markers and Agro-Morphological Traits. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 64, 599-610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] 高张莹, 张海峰, 陈国平, 等. 核桃楸种群果核形态及地理变异[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2017, 23(4): 609-615.
[19] 苏石诚, 韦小丽, 杨彬, 等. 不同种源花榈木种子性状和苗期生长特性比较[J]. 种子, 2021, 40(3): 9-14.
[20] 欧汉彪, 董利军, 李娟, 等. 闽楠种实性状表型多样性与环境地理因子的关系[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2021, 49(8): 45-50.
[21] 陶小所, 姚晓华, 吴昆仑, 等. 基于表型和基因型的藜麦种质资源遗传多样性分析[J]. 西北农业学报, 2024, 33(5): 798-809.
[22] 张芸香, 刘晶晶, 郭晋平, 等. 山西省文冠果种子形态特征及地理种源差异性研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(22): 39-45.
[23] 何小勇. 翅荚木种源遗传多样性及其抗低温胁迫能力研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 长沙: 中南林业科技大学, 2012.
[24] 梁有旺. 不同种源香椿种子及苗木差异性分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2006.
[25] 李晓娜, 张微微, 赵春桥, 等. 延庆区荒滩地土壤理化性质及其对植物多样性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(3): 695-701.
[26] 李懋学, 陈瑞阳. 关于植物核型分析的标准化问题[J]. 武汉植物学研究, 1985, 3(4): 297-302.
[27] 李军, 张召雷, 王晓敏, 等. 应用种子形态及DNA条形码技术鉴定黄芪及混伪品种子[J]. 中草药, 2022, 53(24): 7871-7879.
[28] 梁瑞龙, 周全连, 李娟, 等. 生态与经济型乡土阔叶树种任豆研究进展及其发展对策[J]. 广西林业科学, 2015, 44(2): 156-161.
[29] 王青天. 任豆树引种育苗试验[J]. 林业实用技术, 2003(1): 27.
[30] 沈才智, 刘丙万. 生境对生物多样性影响研究进展[J]. 现代农业科技, 2011(23): 305-306+313.
[31] 赵艳新. 任豆地理种源/家系早期生长性状变异与选择研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 广州: 华南农业大学, 2016.
[32] 许峰, 张子学, 杨雪, 等. 分子标记技术在《种子检验学》中的教学实践[J]. 中国种业, 2025(3): 58-63.