基于关键能力量化评价指标的高职教学实践——以给排水工程技术专业课程《GIS理论与软件实操》为例
Teaching Practice in Higher Vocational Education Based on Quantitative Evaluation Indicators of Key Competencies—A Case Study of the Course “GIS Theory and Software Practice” in Water Supply and Drainage Engineering Technology
DOI: 10.12677/ve.2025.1410464, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 黄 强*, 欧阳潦, 迟惠中, 杨博暄:深圳职业技术大学材料与环境工程学院,广东 深圳
关键词: 关键能力量化评价教学改革理实创一体化Key Competencies Quantitative Evaluation Teaching Reform Integration of Theory Practice and Innovation
摘要: 本文以高职给排水工程技术专业的核心课程《GIS理论与软件实操》为例,围绕关键能力培养的现实困境,构建了一套包含认知能力、合作能力、创新能力和职业能力4个一级维度及16项二级指标的可量化评价体系。通过企业调研与学情分析,明确关键能力培养短板,设计“理实创一体化”教学模式,依托“双导师制研学小组”“线上线下混合教学”“虚实结合实践”及“双创项目孵化”四条路径,将关键能力培养融入课程教学全过程。教学实践表明,该模式有效促进了学生关键能力的发展,实现了“教–学–评”闭环优化,为高职专业课程中关键能力的量化评价与培养实践提供了可借鉴的案例和方法支撑。
Abstract: This study addresses the practical challenge of cultivating key competencies in higher vocational education by examining the course GIS Theory and Software Practice within the water supply and drainage engineering technology program. A quantitative evaluation system was developed, consisting of four first-level dimensions—cognitive, cooperative, innovative, and professional abilities—and 16 second-level indicators. Through industry research and analysis of student learning profiles, specific gaps in key competency development were identified. An integrated teaching model combining theory, practice, and innovation was designed and implemented through four pathways: a dual-tutor research group system, blended online and offline instruction, virtual-real hybrid practice, and innovation-entrepreneurship project incubation. This approach embedded key competency development throughout the instructional process. Teaching practice demonstrated that the model effectively enhances students’ key competencies, achieves closed- loop optimization of the teaching-learning-evaluation process, and offers a replicable case and methodological support for quantifying and fostering key competencies in vocational professional courses.
文章引用:黄强, 欧阳潦, 迟惠中, 杨博暄. 基于关键能力量化评价指标的高职教学实践——以给排水工程技术专业课程《GIS理论与软件实操》为例[J]. 职业教育发展, 2025, 14(10): 72-78. https://doi.org/10.12677/ve.2025.1410464

参考文献

[1] 张晶晶, 郭晨, 朱钊. 关键能力研究的国际经验与启示[J]. 当代职业教育, 2020(1): 78-86.
[2] 龙育才, 郭广军, 石金艳. 高职机电类专业学生“关键能力”一体化培养实践探索[J]. 教育现代化, 2020, 7(27): 9-11.
[3] 教育部 人力资源社会保障部 工业和信息化部关于印发《制造业人才发展规划指南》的通知[EB/OL].
http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A07/moe_953/201702/t20170214_296162.html, 2025-09-02.
[4] 中共中央办公厅 国务院办公厅印发《关于深化教育体制机制改革的意见》[EB/OL].
https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2017-09/24/content_5227267.htm, 2025-09-02.
[5] 杨院, 范媛媛. 从工科生到工程师: 工程教育体系的核心指向、现实困境及变革路径[J]. 教育发展研究, 2024, 44(19): 78-84.
[6] 胡凌霞. 数字化背景下高职生关键能力培育与优化策略研究[J]. 青年发展论坛, 2025, 35(2): 56-67.
[7] 许菁. 新时代高职学生关键能力培养模式探讨[J]. 汽车维护与修理, 2020(22): 56-58.
[8] 田元训, 肖明胜, 刘宁. 企业深度参加高职院校学生关键能力培养研究[J]. 中国职业教育技术, 2022(17): 70-75.
[9] 潘月娟, 黄晶. 学前教育评估人员专业素养指标体系的构建——基于德尔菲法的调查分析[J]. 学前教育研究, 2024(2): 31-41.
[10] 张怡, 宋晨晨, 宋鹏, 等. 基于层次分析法模型的理工科专业校内评估研究[J]. 系统科学学院, 2025, 33(3): 116-121.