实验小鼠四种常见病原微生物多重PCR检测体系的建立
Establishment of Multiple PCR Detection System for Four Common Pathogenic Microorganisms in Laboratory Mouse
摘要: 目的:建立实验小鼠四种常见病原微生物的多重PCR快速检测方法。方法:对四种病原微生物引物浓度、特异性以及DNA模板的敏感性进行测试,优化多重PCR反应条件;对活体实验动物口腔及粪便样本进行优化处理,简化DNA模板的提取方法。结果:四种病原微生物的多重PCR反应在引物浓度0.15 μmol/L和退火温度56℃的反应条件下扩增,灵敏度高(绿脓杆菌的敏感性为100 pg,金黄色葡萄球菌的敏感性为1 pg,肺炎克雷伯杆菌的敏感性为10 pg,嗜肺巴斯德杆菌的敏感性为1 pg)且特异性好,与实验动物常见的致病菌无交叉反应。活体实验动物口腔及粪便样本经培养煮沸1 min后即能快速获取检测模板。结论:该方法灵敏特异、简便快速,可为活体实验动物大规模筛查和检测四种病原微生物提供借鉴。
Abstract: Objective: This study aimed to establish a rapid multiplex PCR method for the detection of four common pathogenic microorganisms in laboratory mouse. Methods: The primer concentration, specificity and the sensitivity of the DNA template for the four pathogenic microorganisms were tested to optimize the multiple PCR reaction conditions; optimized processing of oral and fecal samples from live experimental animals was performed to simplify the extraction method of the DNA template. Result: The multiple PCR reaction of the four pathogenic microorganisms amplified efficiently at the reaction conditions of primer concentration of 0.15 μmol/Land annealing temperature of 56˚C, demonstrating high sensitivity (sensitivity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa is 100 pg, sensitivity of Staphylococcus aureus is 1 pg, the sensitivity of Klebsiella pneumoniae is 10 pg, and the sensitivity of Pasteurella pneumophila is 1 pg) and good specificity, there is no cross-reaction with the common pathogenic bacteria in experimental animals. Rapid template extraction was achieved from oral and fecal samples of live experimental animals after boiling for 1 min. Conclusion: The method was sensitive, specific, simple and fast, providing a reference for large-scale screening and detection of the four pathogenic microorganisms in live experimental animals.
文章引用:彭丽娜, 张曼, 徐汪节. 实验小鼠四种常见病原微生物多重PCR检测体系的建立[J]. 微生物前沿, 2025, 14(3): 129-137. https://doi.org/10.12677/amb.2025.143015

参考文献

[1] 魏杰, 林建伟, 付瑞, 等. 2009-2013年北京地区实验动物质量抽检结果分析[J]. 实验动物科学, 2014, 31(2): 1-6.
[2] 冯丽萍, 陶凌云, 周洁, 等. 上海地区实验动物病原体感染指数分析[J]. 中国实验动物学报, 2016, 24(3): 309-312.
[3] Bleich, A., Kirsch, P., Sahly, H., Fahey, J., Smoczek, A., Hedrich, H., et al. (2008) Klebsiella oxytoca: Opportunistic Infections in Laboratory Rodents. Laboratory Animals, 42, 369-375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] 田克恭, 贺争鸣, 刘群, 顾小雪. 实验动物疫病学[M]. 北京: 北京农业大学出版社, 2015.
[5] 丁浛高, 蔡丽媛, 杨浩. 隔离设施中小鼠金黄色葡萄球菌和绿脓杆菌的检测[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2014, 35(9): 13-15.
[6] Benga, L., Benten, W.P.M., Engelhardt, E., Bleich, A., Gougoula, C. and Sager, M. (2013) Development of a Multiplex PCR Assay Based on the 16S-23S rRNA Internal Transcribed Spacer for the Detection and Identification of Rodent Pasteurellaceae. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 95, 256-261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] 冯杰, 谢建云, 胡建华, 高诚. 3种条件性致病菌三重PCR检测方法的建立及初步应用[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2015, 42(6): 1389-1395.
[8] 谭燕玲, 朱瑞良, 王慧, 等. 鸡胚胎性病原菌多重PCR检测方法的建立[J]. 中国预防兽医学报, 2011, 33(5): 374-377.
[9] 胡瑜. 金黄色葡萄球菌耐热核酸酶的功能鉴定及表达调控[D]: [博士学位论文]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2013.
[10] 张飞燕, 赵玲, 金洁, 等. 多重PCR技术在实验动物病原检测中的应用[J]. 中国比较医学杂志, 2018, 28(10): 111-116.
[11] 李娜, 杨秋龙, 李思璧, 等. 模型动物生物净化方法的探讨[J]. 上海交通大学学报(农业科学版), 2014, 32(5): 85-88.
[12] Sint, D., Raso, L. and Traugott, M. (2012) Advances in Multiplex PCR: Balancing Primer Efficiencies and Improving Detection Success. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 3, 898-905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Zhang, Y., Sun, L., Zhu, R., Zhang, S., Liu, S., Wang, Y., et al. (2022) Porcine Gut Microbiota in Mediating Host Metabolic Adaptation to Cold Stress. npj Biofilms and Microbiomes, 8, Article No. 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Sánchez-Navarro, J.A., Aparicio, F., Herranz, M.C., Minafra, A., Myrta, A. and Pallás, V. (2005) Simultaneous Detection and Identification of Eight Stone Fruit Viruses by One-Step RT-PCR. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 111, 77-84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] 曹子健, 邱艳红, 秦文韬, 等. 多重PCR技术在植物病原物检测中的应用[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(8): 216-224.
[16] 钟泽澄, 王进, 张师音, 等. 多重PCR技术研究进展[J]. 生物工程学报, 2020, 36(2): 171-179.