耐心资本视角下小学语文过程性评价体系构建
Construction of Process-Oriented Evaluation System for Primary School Chinese from the Perspective of Patience Capital
DOI: 10.12677/ae.2025.15101810, PDF,   
作者: 王小敏:华南师范大学教育科学学院(汕尾),广东 汕尾;汪惟宝*:华南师范大学创意设计学院,广东 汕尾
关键词: 小学语文过程性评价过程性评价耐心资本耐心资本理论Process-Oriented Evaluation of Primary School Chinese Process-Oriented Evaluation Patience Capital Patience Capital Theory
摘要: 在当前教育评价改革背景下,小学语文过程性评价仍面临形式化、短期化等现实困境。本文尝试基于“耐心资本”理论视角,从时间、资源与主体三个维度探讨其在教育中的适配性,初步提出长期导向、差异赋能与多元协同三大评价原则。通过分析学生、教师、家长及学校制度四个层面的耐心资本缺失现状,揭示其结构性成因,并尝试构建包含理念革新、机制设计与制度保障三位一体的过程性评价体系。该体系着重将“耐心”显性化为可操作的评价指标,通过家校社协同共评、耐心积分激励等方式,促进语文素养的长期培育。本研究仅为破解过程性评价实施难题提供初步思路,未来需进一步开展实证研究加以完善。
Abstract: Against the backdrop of current educational assessment reforms, formative evaluation in elementary Chinese language education continues to face practical challenges such as formalism and short-termism. This paper attempts to explore the applicability of “patience capital” theory in education from three dimensions—time, resources, and agency, and preliminarily proposes three evaluation principles: long-term orientation, differentiated empowerment, and multi-stakeholder collaboration. By analyzing the current lack of patience capital across four levels—students, teachers, parents, and school systems, it reveals structural causes and attempts to construct a three-pronged formative assessment system encompassing conceptual innovation, mechanism design, and institutional safeguards. This system emphasizes making “patience” explicit as operational evaluation indicators. Through collaborative evaluation involving home, school, and community, as well as patience-based incentive points, it promotes the long-term cultivation of literacy. This study offers preliminary insights to address implementation challenges in formative assessment, with future empirical research needed for refinement.
文章引用:王小敏, 汪惟宝. 耐心资本视角下小学语文过程性评价体系构建[J]. 教育进展, 2025, 15(10): 124-129. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2025.15101810

参考文献

[1] 姜中裕, 吴福象. 耐心资本、数字经济与创新效率——基于制造业A股上市公司的经验证据[J]. 河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2024, 26(2): 121-133.
[2] 温磊, 李思飞. 耐心资本对企业新质生产力的影响[J]. 中国流通经济, 2024, 38(10): 86-97.
[3] 胡海峰. 培育壮大耐心资本: 内涵、意义、举措[J]. 人民论坛·学术前沿, 2025(2): 96-107.
[4] 代飞, 赵鑫. 耐心资本研究综述及展望[J]. 财会月刊, 2025, 46(12): 90-95.
[5] 李三希, 刘希, 孙海琳. 以耐心资本推动新质生产力发展: 特征意义、现状问题与培育路径[J]. 财经问题研究, 2024(10): 14-28.
[6] 纪志宏. 壮大耐心资本需多元投资主体协同发力[J]. 中国金融, 2024(22): 19-21.
[7] 董怡雯. 语文过程性评价的国际前沿和发展趋势[J]. 语文建设, 2024(22): 13-18.
[8] 李倩. 跨学科学习过程性评价的基本理念[J]. 语文建设, 2024(12): 10-13.
[9] 刘秋梅. “双减”背景下过程性评价的实施策略——以五年级上册第八单元为例[J]. 语文建设, 2023(16): 69-72.
[10] 李新翠. 中小学教师工作负荷: 结构、水平与类型[J]. 湖南师范大学教育科学学报, 2021, 20(2): 82-89.
[11] 李淑芳, 周先进. 中小学教师实施过程性评价的困境及其突破[J]. 教学与管理, 2024(18): 99-102.
[12] 高原. 知识社会学视角下我国当代家庭教育观念的传播与建构[J]. 教育发展研究, 2023, 43(6): 45-52.
[13] 王帅, 张雨强. 网络赋能碎片化学习: 特征、成因及策略[J]. 成人教育, 2022, 42(8): 21-27.
[14] 邢利红. 指向改进的学生过程性评价结果应用探究[J]. 教学与管理, 2024(30): 105-108.
[15] 张红霞, 刘志军. 溯源与正本: 关于“过程性评价”的再认识[J]. 教育发展研究, 2024, 44(12): 43-53.