前锯肌平面阻滞复合全身麻醉与全身麻醉在胸腔镜肺癌手术后镇痛效果对比的Meta分析
Meta-Analysis of Analgesic Effect Comparison between Anterior Serratus Plane Block Combined General Anesthesia and General Anesthesia after Thoracoscopic Lung Cancer Surgery
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2025.15102783, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 曹慕奕, 喻小芙, 热萨莱提·托合提:新疆医科大学第六临床医学院,新疆 乌鲁木齐;姚鑫鑫, 焦桢桢:新疆医科大学第三临床医学院,新疆 乌鲁木齐;王 婷*:新疆医科大学附属肿瘤医院麻醉与围术期医学中心,新疆 乌鲁木齐
关键词: 前锯肌平面阻滞胸腔镜肺癌Meta分析Serratus Plane Block Thoracoscopy Lung Cancer Meta-Analysis
摘要: 目的:采用Meta分析评估前锯肌平面阻滞(Serratus Plane Block, SPB)复合全身麻醉相较于单纯全身麻醉,在胸腔镜肺癌手术患者术后镇痛效果方面的差异。方法:系统检索PubMed、万方数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、维普中文期刊数据库以及中国知网总库中关于胸腔镜下肺部手术中应用SPB复合全身麻醉与单纯全身麻醉进行镇痛的随机对照试验(RCT),检索时间为建库起至2024年10月。辅以手工检索相关会议论文集、学位论文等灰色文献,确保纳入研究的全面性。由两位研究人员根据纳入与排除标准筛选文献,进行资料提取;两位研究人员采用Cochrane偏倚风险评估工具评估纳入文献质量,使用RevMa5.4软件进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入了17篇临床随机对照实验(n = 1290)。Meta分析结果显示:两组术后4 h、6 h、8 h、12 h、48 h静息运动状态VAS评分有统计学差异(P < 0.1),术中丙泊酚用量差异有统计学意义(P < 0.01),术中舒芬太尼用量、瑞芬太尼用量差异有统计学意义(P = 0.02)。两组术后气管拔管时间有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。两组术后48h镇痛泵按压次数有统计学意义(P = 0.25)。结论:前锯肌平面阻滞复合全身麻醉在胸腔镜肺癌患者手术后能降低术后不同时间段静息运动状态VAS评分,能减少术中丙泊酚,舒芬太尼及瑞芬太尼的使用,降低术后不良反应发生,减少气管插管时间。
Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the difference in postoperative analgesic efficacy between serratus plane block (SPB) combined with general anesthesia and general anesthesia in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for lung cancer using meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Wanfang Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), VIP Chinese Journal Database, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SPB combined with general anesthesia versus general anesthesia for analgesia in VATS. The search period was from the establishment of each database to October 2024. Supplementary manual retrieval of gray literature, such as relevant conference proceedings and dissertations, was performed to ensure the comprehensiveness of included studies. Two researchers independently screened literatures according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the quality of included literatures using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 software. Results: A total of 17 clinical randomized controlled trials were included (n = 1290). Meta-analysis results showed that there were statistically significant differences in visual analog scale (VAS) scores at rest and during movement at 4 h, 6 h, 8 h, 12 h, and 48 h after surgery between the two groups (P < 0.1). Significant differences were observed in intraoperative propofol dosage (P < 0.01), intraoperative sufentanil dosage, and intraoperative remifentanil dosage (P = 0.02). There was a statistically significant difference in postoperative tracheal extubation time between the two groups (P < 0.01). The difference in the number of presses of analgesic pumps within 48 h after surgery between the two groups was statistically significant (P = 0.25). Conclusion: Serratus plane block combined with general anesthesia can reduce VAS scores at rest and during movement at different postoperative time points, decrease the intraoperative usage of propofol, sufentanil, and remifentanil, reduce the incidence of postoperative adverse reactions, and shorten the tracheal intubation time in patients undergoing VATS for lung cancer.
文章引用:曹慕奕, 喻小芙, 热萨莱提·托合提, 姚鑫鑫, 焦桢桢, 王婷. 前锯肌平面阻滞复合全身麻醉与全身麻醉在胸腔镜肺癌手术后镇痛效果对比的Meta分析[J]. 临床医学进展, 2025, 15(10): 497-513. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2025.15102783

参考文献

[1] 中国肺癌防治联盟, 中华医学会呼吸病学分会肺癌学组, 中国医师协会呼吸医师分会肺癌工作委员会. 肺癌筛查与管理中国专家共识[J]. 国际呼吸杂志, 2019, 39(21): 1604-1615.
[2] Hu, W., Yuan, Y. and Chen, L. (2019) Single-Port Thoracoscopic Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer. World Journal of Surgery, 43, 567-570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Endo, Y., Nakamura, Y., Kuroda, M., Ito, Y. and Hori, T. (2019) The Utility of a 3D Endoscope and Robot-Assisted System for MIDCAB. Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 25, 200-204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] 孟杰, 肖航, 曾宪伟, 等. 超声引导下前锯肌平面阻滞对胸腔镜肺癌根治术术后镇痛及炎性反应的影响[J]. 临床肺科杂志, 2018, 23(5): 913-916.
[5] 张隆盛, 林旭林, 张欢楷, 等. 前锯肌平面阻滞联合静脉镇痛用于肺叶切除术患者的效果[J]. 医学信息(西安), 2020, 33(18): 54-58.
[6] 董礼, 姚曙东. 超声引导下前锯肌平面阻滞对胸腔镜肺癌根治术患者镇痛及免疫功能的影响[J]. 皖南医学院学报, 2021, 40(2): 160-162+178.
[7] 袁慧敏. 超声引导下前锯肌平面阻滞对胸腔镜肺癌手术患者应激反应、镇痛效果及肺功能的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 张家口: 河北北方学院, 2023.
[8] 商丽华, 肖甄男, 龙波. 超声引导下前锯肌平面阻滞对胸腔镜手术患者术后镇痛的影响[J]. 中国医师进修杂志, 2018, 41(9): 819-822.
[9] 吴晓顺, 张训功, 刘艳萍. 前锯肌阻滞辅助镇痛对胸腔镜下肺癌手术患者手术效果观察[J]. 四川生理科学杂志, 2023, 45(2): 227-230.
[10] 卢珺, 潘继品. 超声引导阻滞麻醉在胸腔镜肺癌根治术后镇痛中的研究[J]. 浙江创伤外科, 2019, 24(6): 1249-1250.
[11] 黄小亮, 周洁刚. SAPB结合全身麻醉对胸腔镜肺癌根治术患者术后应激指标与不良反应的影响[J]. 中国医学创新, 2023, 20(1): 56-60.
[12] 曹东航, 黄文广, 曹建斌, 等. 前锯肌阻滞对非气管插管经胸腔镜肺癌根治术应激反应的影响分析[J]. 中国医刊, 2019, 54(12): 1339-1343.
[13] 陈伟, 戴泽平. 超声引导前锯肌平面阻滞在胸腔镜肺癌根治术术后镇痛中的应用效果分析[J]. 齐齐哈尔医学院学报, 2019(10): 1236-1238.
[14] 赵涛, 韩永彬, 王玉娟, 等. 前锯肌平面阻滞对胸腔镜肺癌根治术患者物质能量代谢和胰岛素抵抗的影响[J]. 中国现代医学杂志, 2024, 34(2): 6-11.
[15] 陈艳林, 袁莉, 贾彤, 等. 前锯肌平面阻滞对胸腔镜肺癌根治术后肺功能和免疫功能的影响[J]. 安徽医学, 2024, 45(5): 559-564.
[16] 洪李萍, 朱恩华, 周娟. 超声引导前锯肌阻滞在胸腔镜肺癌手术麻醉及术后镇痛中的应用效果分析[J]. 系统医学, 2023, 8(1): 114-117.
[17] 黎铨初, 邵泳尧, 罗丽凤, 等. 超声引导前锯肌平面阻滞麻醉在胸腔镜肺癌根治术中的应用[J]. 中国医学创新, 2021, 18(21): 46-50.
[18] 章世玮. 超声引导下前锯肌阻滞对胸腔镜肺癌根治术全身麻醉苏醒期躁动的影响[J]. 浙江临床医学, 2021, 23(5): 717-719.
[19] 刘亮, 耳建旭, 高瑞芳, 等. 胸腔镜肺癌根治术麻醉的改良策略: 前锯肌平面阻滞联合全身麻醉[J]. 中华麻醉学杂志, 2021, 41(7): 831-834.
[20] 于海荣, 袁媛, 柯宏刚, 等. 前锯肌平面阻滞对非小细胞肺癌胸腔镜根治术患者术后镇痛效果的影响[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2019, 35(5): 436-439.
[21] 武琳, 廖燕凌. 前锯肌神经阻滞复合全麻用于肺癌根治术的镇痛效果[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(18): 3094-3098.
[22] Aliyari, S., Hosseini-Amiri, M., Zareiyan, A. and Dabbagh-Moghadam, A. (2018) The Effects of Extended Parallel Process Model on Obese Soldiers’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices about Obesity Management: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research, 23, 458-464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Loftus, R.W., Yeager, M.P., Clark, J.A., Brown, J.R., Abdu, W.A., Sengupta, D.K., et al. (2010) Intraoperative Ketamine Reduces Perioperative Opiate Consumption in Opiate-Dependent Patients with Chronic Back Pain Undergoing Back Surgery. Anesthesiology, 113, 639-646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Feigl, G., Aichner, E., Mattersberger, C., Zahn, P.K., Avila Gonzalez, C. and Litz, R. (2018) Ultrasound-Guided Anterior Approach to the Axillary and Intercostobrachial Nerves in the Axillary Fossa: An Anatomical Investigation. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 121, 883-889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] 赵赢, 李蓉, 潘鹏, 等. 超声引导下不同区域神经阻滞在胸腔镜肺癌切除手术中的效果比较[J]. 中国现代医药杂志, 2022, 24(3): 47-51.
[26] Jackson, J.C., Tan, K.S., Pedoto, A., Park, B.J., Rusch, V.W., Jones, D.R., et al. (2024) Effects of Serratus Anterior Plane Block on Early Recovery from Thoracoscopic Lung Resection: A Randomized, Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Anesthesiology, 141, 1065-1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Azizoğlu, M., Yapıcı, D., Bayülgen, A., Sagün, A., Özdemir, L. and Rumeli, Ş. (2021) The Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Serratus Anterior Plane Block in Addition to Intrathecal Morphine on Early Postoperative Period after Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery. Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 29, 471-479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] 袁霖, 钟茂林. 超声引导前锯肌平面阻滞的研究进展[J]. 赣南医学院学报, 2024, 44(2): 213-218.
[29] 林嘉莹, 钟国城, 刘凯星, 等. 超声引导下前锯肌平面阻滞与肋间神经阻滞对胸腔镜辅助开胸手术术后患者恢复的影响[J]. 中国医药科学, 2025, 15(3): 164-167.
[30] Gan, T.J., Belani, K.G., Bergese, S., Chung, F., Diemunsch, P., Habib, A.S., et al. (2020) Fourth Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 131, 411-448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] 伍治强, 综述, 唐小军, 等. 单孔胸腔镜手术应用进展[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2020, 20(6): 553-556.