跨境电子商务纠纷在线诉讼机制研究
Research on Online Litigation Mechanism of Cross-Border E-Commerce Dispute
摘要: 随着互联网的快速发展,跨境电商也日渐繁荣,但随之而来的跨境电子商务纠纷也增多,在线诉讼是解决该类纠纷的较好方式。本文聚焦跨境电子商务纠纷在线诉讼机制展开研究,旨在解决跨境电商蓬勃发展背景下纠纷日益增多,而传统诉讼方式难以满足需求的问题,探索完善在线诉讼机制的路径。本文先阐述跨境电子商务纠纷的定义与特征,包括标的额小量多、类型多样、内容复杂等;接着分析线上解决现状,介绍了ODR机制和法院在线诉讼机制的应用及局限;随后深入剖析在线诉讼面临的管辖权确定困难、法律适用冲突、电子证据认定难、平台建设滞后、执行难等困境。研究提出完善措施:健全在线诉讼规则,明确管辖权、法律适用及电子证据认定标准;完善平台建设,提升功能、保障安全并加强国际协同;加大技术投入,应用电子签名、人工智能、区块链等技术。最后指出在线诉讼是解决跨境电商纠纷的有效途径,需国际协同推动规则、技术与实践创新,以促进跨境电商健康发展。
Abstract: With the rapid development of the Internet, cross-border e-commerce is becoming more and more prosperous, but cross-border e-commerce disputes are also increasing, online litigation is a better way to solve such disputes. This paper focuses on the online litigation mechanism of cross-border e-commerce disputes, aiming at solving the problem that the traditional litigation methods are difficult to meet the demand under the background of the vigorous development of cross-border e-commerce, and exploring the path to improve the online litigation mechanism. This paper first describes the definition and characteristics of cross-border e-commerce disputes, including small amount, large amount, diverse types, complex content, etc. Then it analyzes the current situation of online resolution, and introduces the application and limitations of ODR mechanism and court online litigation mechanism; Then it deeply analyzes the difficulties faced by online litigation, such as the difficulty of jurisdiction determination, the conflict of law application, the difficulty of electronic evidence identification, the lag of platform construction and the difficulty of execution. The study proposes improvement measures: improve online litigation rules, clarify jurisdiction, application of law and electronic evidence identification standards; improve platform construction, enhance functions, ensure security and strengthen international coordination; increase investment in technology, and apply electronic signature, artificial intelligence, blockchain and other technologies. Finally, it is pointed out that online litigation is an effective way to solve cross-border e-commerce disputes, and international cooperation is needed to promote the innovation of rules, technologies and practices in order to promote the healthy development of cross-border e-commerce.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
谢晓煜. 跨境电商在线纠纷解决机制研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 烟台: 烟台大学, 2023.
|
|
[2]
|
徐涵. 我国跨境网购纠纷在线解决制度建构研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 蚌埠: 安徽财经大学, 2016.
|
|
[3]
|
Schultz, T. (2004) Does Online Dispute Resolution Need Governmental Intervention? The Case of Architectures of Control and Trust. North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology, 6, Article 6.
|
|
[4]
|
赵家睿. “一带一路”背景下跨境电子商务纠纷解决问题研究[J]. 智库时代, 2020(6): 51-52.
|
|
[5]
|
姜英超. 电子商务纠纷在线解决机制研究[J]. 连云港师范高等专科学校学报, 2018, 35(1): 34-38.
|
|
[6]
|
夏夕晴. 以东盟ODR机制为借鉴的我国跨境电子商务ODR机制构建[J]. 中阿科技论坛(中英文), 2023(7): 21-25.
|
|
[7]
|
刘艳娜, 郭艳芳. 我国跨境电子商务纠纷在线解决机制的发展与完善[J]. 燕山大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 23(1): 72-79.
|
|
[8]
|
谢聪敏. 跨境电商争议在线解决机制比较研究[J]. 哈尔滨学院学报, 2023, 44(9): 33-37.
|
|
[9]
|
龚辉, 黄俊杰, 徐铭浩, 等. 在线争议解决(ODR)在跨境电子商务领域的应用研究[J]. 中国商论, 2020(4): 22-23.
|
|
[10]
|
喻厚智. 电子商务纠纷网上诉讼机制研究[J]. 法制与社会, 2019(5): 98-100.
|
|
[11]
|
杨楚欣. “互联网+”时代跨境电子商务纠纷解决模式研究[J]. 现代商业, 2018(6): 45-46.
|
|
[12]
|
欧丹. 跨境电子商务纠纷解决的现状与对策——以浙江为例[J]. 黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报, 2017(1): 69-72.
|
|
[13]
|
吴洪先. B2C电子商务在线纠纷解决机制刍议[J]. 法制与经济, 2016(7): 128-131.
|