论《娇红记》的“怨谱”意识
On the Consciousness of “Yuan Pu” in “Jiaohong Ji”
摘要: “怨”的概念在元明时期的戏剧领域生成了新的内涵，经由《琵琶记》的着意书写，到了孟称舜的《娇红记》，“怨”的生命个体意识更加强烈，情感意蕴愈发深沉，借由评论家的阐发，具有中国气质的悲剧理论——“怨谱”说，最终形成。《娇红记》的“怨谱”书写由情入手，兼涉社会、人生，以喜衬悲，极写苦怨，传达出“泪山血海”的悲剧意蕴。
Abstract: The concept of “resentment” generated new connotations in the field of drama during the Yuan and Ming dynasties. Through the intentional writing of “Pipa Ji” and Meng Chengshun’s “Jiaohong Ji”, the individual consciousness of “resentment” became stronger and the emotional connotation became deeper. Through the interpretation of critics, a tragic theory with Chinese characteristics, the “Yuan Pu” theory, was finally formed. The writing of the “Yuan Pu” in “Jiaohong Ji” starts with emotions and involves both society and life, using joy to complement sorrow, and extremely depicts bitterness and resentment, conveying the tragic meaning of “mountains of tears and seas of blood”.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
谢柏梁. 中国悲剧史纲[M]. 上海: 学林出版社, 1993.
|
|
[2]
|
秦学人, 侯作卿, 编著. 中国古典编剧理论资料汇辑[M]. 北京: 中国戏剧出版社, 1984: 42.
|
|
[3]
|
高明, 著. 钱南扬, 校注. 元本琵琶记校注[M]. 北京: 中华书局出版社, 2009: 1.
|
|
[4]
|
朱万曙. 明代戏曲评点研究第1辑[M]. 合肥: 安徽教育出版社, 2002: 158.
|
|
[5]
|
袁劲. 中国文化关键词“怨”的审美生成[D]: [博士学位论文]. 武汉: 武汉大学, 2017.
|
|
[6]
|
袁劲. “怨”的审美生成[M]. 武汉: 武汉大学出版社, 2019: 251.
|
|
[7]
|
孟称舜, 著. 朱颖辉, 辑校. 孟称舜集[M]. 北京: 中华书局出版社, 2005.
|
|
[8]
|
赖利明. 飞红论[J]. 贵州教育学院学报(社会科学版), 1999(3): 65-68.
|
|
[9]
|
夏秀. 从“发愤抒情”到“不平则鸣”——诗怨内涵演变之“直抒怨艾”路径探析[J]. 齐鲁学刊, 2013(4): 116-121.
|
|
[10]
|
刘婷婷. 时代的悲歌女性命运的缩影——浅析《娇红记》中的“怨谱” [J]. 戏剧文学, 2020(10): 99-103.
|
|
[11]
|
郭佳慧. 简析《娇红记》中的丁怜怜形象[J]. 戏剧之家, 2016(11): 30-31.
|
|
[12]
|
杨婧. 孟称舜《娇红记》的三重悲剧[J]. 文化学刊, 2016(1): 195-198.
|
|
[13]
|
谢柏梁. 中华戏曲文化学[M]. 北京: 中国戏剧出版社, 2003: 77.
|
|
[14]
|
谢柏梁. 明代戏曲的悲剧观: 怨谱说[J]. 文学遗产, 1989(6): 14-25.
|