语义学探讨:孔子至公孙龙的学术脉络
An Examination of Semantics: The Academic Connections from Confucius to Gongsun Long
DOI: 10.12677/acpp.2025.1410493, PDF,   
作者: 张景栋:新疆师范大学政法学院,新疆 乌鲁木齐
关键词: 名实指物论正名语义学Names and Reality Theory of Denotation Rectification of Names Semantics
摘要: 公孙龙作为中国历史上专注于语言哲学研究的学者,其著作《公孙龙子》在语言逻辑领域具有重要地位。尽管从传统形式逻辑的角度来看,先秦时期的中国在这一领域或许并不突出,但若从符号学和现代语言学的视角进行观察,先秦中国无疑展现出深厚的语义学思想传统。在先秦时期,诸如孔子、墨子、荀子、公孙龙等诸子百家在其对名实问题的探讨中,大多都涉及了语义学的研究。尤其是公孙龙,他在名实关系上对事物与其指称进行了系统的逻辑论证,其对语义学思想的探讨达到了相当的高度,是先秦语义学思想发展的重要推动力。
Abstract: As a scholar who specialized in the study of philosophy of language in Chinese history, Gongsun Long’s work “The Gongsun Longzi” has an important place in the field of linguistic logic. From the perspective of traditional formal logic, pre-Qin China may not be prominent in this field, but if observed from the semiotic and modern linguistic perspective, pre-Qin China will undoubtedly show a profound tradition of semantic thinking. During the pre-Qin period, hundreds of scholars such as Confucius, Mozi, Xunzi, and Gongsun Long were mostly involved in the study of semantics in their discussion of the question of name truth. In particular, Gongsun Long made systematic logical arguments about things and his allegations in relation to name and fact, and his discussion of semantic thinking reached a considerable height, marking an important driving force in the development of semantic thought in pre-Qin.
文章引用:张景栋. 语义学探讨:孔子至公孙龙的学术脉络[J]. 哲学进展, 2025, 14(10): 23-27. https://doi.org/10.12677/acpp.2025.1410493

参考文献

[1] 陈道德, 曾祥云. 符号学视野下的先秦名辩学研究[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2017: 98.
[2] 胡平生, 张萌. 礼记: 上册[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2017: 37.
[3] 黎翔凤. 管子校注[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2017: 209.
[4] 许慎, 撰. 说文解字[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1963: 31.
[5] 张学贤. 《论语》导读[M]. 杭州: 浙江大学出版社, 2013.
[6] 黄克剑. 公孙龙子[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2012.