补贴策略下考虑直播努力的电商直播销售模式选择研究
Selection of E-Commerce Livestreaming Sales Modes under Subsidy Policies with Consideration of Livestreaming Effort
摘要: 为顺应电商直播兴起的时代趋势并助力经济发展,通过补贴激励政策鼓励商家积极参与直播销售,推动传统销售模式与直播渠道的融合,已成为企业渠道战略的重要方向。该论文构建一个包含商家、直播平台与消费者的双渠道销售模型,系统比较了三种销售模式(传统销售、直播销售、两者结合)下,不同补贴对象(补贴商家或补贴平台)对销售策略与利润表现的影响。研究结果表明:在直播渠道运营成本较高的情境下,补贴商家有助于提升其参与积极性,而当平台影响力较强时,补贴平台可实现更优的整体绩效。此外,双渠道模式在一定参数范围内可兼顾销量扩张与利润提升。该论文不仅丰富了直播电商补贴机制的理论研究,也为平台制定差异化补贴策略、商家优化渠道选择提供了有益参考。
Abstract: With the rapid rise of livestreaming in e-commerce, platforms have increasingly adopted subsidy mechanisms to encourage merchants to participate in livestream sales. As an emerging sales model, livestreaming has demonstrated significant consumer market potential both in China and globally. The integration of traditional and livestream channels has become a key issue in firms’ channel strategy decisions. This paper develops a theoretical model involving merchants, livestream platforms, and consumers to compare three sales modes—traditional retailing, pure livestreaming, and dual-channel strategies—under two types of subsidy schemes: platform-to-merchant and platform-to-platform. The analysis shows that subsidizing merchants is more effective in motivating participation when livestreaming incurs high operational costs, while subsidizing the platform yields better system-wide performance when the platform has greater market power and lower commission rates. Moreover, the dual-channel strategy can achieve a balance between profit and market coverage under certain conditions. This study contributes to the literature on e-commerce subsidy mechanisms and provides practical implications for platform subsidy design and merchant channel decisions.
文章引用:杨雨欣, 韩小雅, 葛松琦. 补贴策略下考虑直播努力的电商直播销售模式选择研究[J]. 运筹与模糊学, 2025, 15(5): 100-114. https://doi.org/10.12677/orf.2025.155235

参考文献

[1] Chiang, W.K., Chhajed, D. and Hess, J.D. (2003) Direct Marketing, Indirect Profits: A Strategic Analysis of Dual-Channel Supply-Chain Design. Management Science, 49, 1-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Cattani, K., Gilland, W., Heese, H.S. and Swaminathan, J. (2006) Boiling Frogs: Pricing Strategies for a Manufacturer Adding a Direct Channel That Competes with the Traditional Channel. Production and Operations Management, 15, 40-56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 赵连霞. 制造商开辟网络直销下的混合渠道供应链定价决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(S1): 557-563.
[4] 孙自来, 王旭坪, 阮俊虎, 等. 考虑直销成本和平台交易费的制造商销售模式选择[J]. 管理学报, 2018, 15(1): 111-117.
[5] 王文宾, 丁军飞. 基于电商平台的混合销售渠道对供应链决策的影响研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(6): 89-97.
[6] 朱晓东, 郭亚捷, 丁莲. 考虑主播影响力的制造商销售渠道选择研究[J]. 合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 46(4): 568-576.
[7] 张艳芬, 徐琪, 陈海军. 考虑平台流量补贴的直播电商供应链协同激励契约研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2024, 33(7): 144-150.
[8] 邵灵芝, 周强. 考虑消费者偏好行为的供应链销售渠道与自有品牌决策研究[J]. 南华大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 26(2): 90-100.
[9] 李逸龙. 溢出效应下直播带货双渠道激励机制研究[J]. 中国商论, 2024, 33(24): 83-87.
[10] 王滔, 颜波. 博弈视角下的在线渠道决策研究[J]. 管理科学学报, 2017, 20(6): 64-77.
[11] Wang, R., Liu, C. and Tang, C.S. (2022) Livestreaming as a New Channel for Online Retailing: Success Factors and Strategies. Journal of Marketing Research, 59, 141-157.
[12] Guo, L., Hu, Y. and Wang, J. (2022) Influencer Marketing in Live Streaming: A Three-Party Contract Perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 245, Article ID: 108402.
[13] Ma, J. and Zhang, K. (2021) Game-Theoretic Modeling of Cooperation between E-Commerce Platform and Influencer in Live-Streaming Marketing. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 48, Article ID: 101078.