达芬奇机器人辅助下双镜联合治疗胆管结石的疗效分析
Efficacy Analysis of the Da Vinci Robotic-Assisted Dual Endoscopy Approach for the Treatment of Choledocholithiasis
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2025.15102819, PDF,   
作者: 李笑冉:山东第一医科大学研究生院,山东 济南;济宁市第一人民医院肝胆外科,山东 济宁;马长林*, 钱瑞坤, 高毓慷:济宁市第一人民医院肝胆外科,山东 济宁;济宁市医学科学研究院肝胆胰外科研究所,山东 济宁
关键词: 达芬奇机器人手术系统胆管结石治疗疗效机器人辅助手术双镜联合治疗 Da Vinci Robotic Surgical System Choledocholithiasis Therapeutic Efficacy Robot-Assisted Surgery Dual-Scope Combined Treatment
摘要: 目的:评估达芬奇机器人辅助下双镜联合治疗胆管结石的疗效及临床应用价值。方法:回顾性分析2022年1月至2023年12月在济宁市第一人民医院收治46列胆管结石患者的临床资料,其中试验组11例接受达芬奇机器人辅助下腹腔镜胆囊切除加胆道镜探查取石联合治疗,对照组35例接受单纯腹腔镜胆囊切除加胆道镜探查联合治疗,两组均采用一期缝合胆管治疗方式;采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估疼痛程度,术后1天和3天检测肝功能及血清中炎症指标。结果:两组结石清除率均为100.0%,试验组术中出血量、术后3 d VAS评分及术后3天腹腔引流量分别为:(6.6 ± 2.4) ml、(0.2 ± 0.6)分和(18.6 ± 15.9) ml,显著短于或少于对照组[分别为(13.5 ± 8.1) ml、(1.5 ± 0.5)分和(34.2 ± 20.9) ml,P < 0.05];但试验组手术时长为(112.0 ± 19.2) min长于对照组(81.5 ± 20.4) min。两组术后肝功能、住院时间及血清炎症指标(CRP、WBC计数)无明显差异(P > 0.05),但试验组术后1天和3天的血清PCT分别为(4.8 ± 9.0) ng/ml (1.1 ± 1.6) ng/ml均显著高于对照组[分别为(0.5 ± 0.9) ng/ml (0.2 ± 0.2) ng/ml,P < 0.05]。术后两组并发症无显著差异(P > 0.05)。结论:达芬奇机器人手术治疗胆管结石效果佳,减少出血、疼痛,有助于临床推广应用。
Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and clinical value of the Da Vinci robotic-assisted dual-endoscope combined treatment for choledocholithiasis. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 46 patients with bile duct stones treated at Jining First People’s Hospital between January 2022 and December 2023. Among them, 11 patients in the experimental group underwent Da Vinci robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with choledochoscopy for stone extraction, while 35 patients in the control group received conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with choledochoscopy. Both groups underwent primary closure of the bile duct. Pain levels were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and liver function as well as serum inflammatory markers were measured on postoperative days 1 and 3. Results: Both groups had a stone clearance rate of 100.0%. Intraoperative blood loss, postoperative day 3 VAS scores, and the amount of abdominal drainage on the third day post-surgery for the observation group were 6.6 ± 2.4 ml, 0.2 ± 0.6, and 18.6 ± 15.9 ml, respectively, which were significantly less than the control group, with 13.5 ± 8.1 ml, 1.5 ± 0.5, and 34.2 ± 20.9 ml (P < 0.05). However, the surgery duration for the observation group (112.0 ± 19.2 minutes) was longer than the control group (81.5 ± 20.4 minutes). There were no significant differences in postoperative liver function, length of hospital stay, or serum inflammatory markers (CRP, WBC count) between the two groups (P > 0.05). Nonetheless, serum PCT levels on the first and third days post-surgery for the observation group (4.8 ± 9.0 ng/ml, 1.1 ± 1.6 ng/ml) were significantly higher than those of the control group (0.5 ± 0.9 ng/ml, 0.2 ± 0.2 ng/ml, P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in complications between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The da Vinci robotic surgery for treating gallstones shows excellent results, reducing bleeding and pain, which is conducive to its clinical promotion and application.
文章引用:李笑冉, 马长林, 钱瑞坤, 高毓慷. 达芬奇机器人辅助下双镜联合治疗胆管结石的疗效分析[J]. 临床医学进展, 2025, 15(10): 780-787. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2025.15102819

参考文献

[1] Cianci, P. and Restini, E. (2021) Management of Cholelithiasis with Choledocholithiasis: Endoscopic and Surgical Approaches. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 27, 4536-4554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] 马丽娜·阿新拜, 张立平, 王林恒, 等. ERCP联合SpyGlass DS治疗困难胆管结石的临床疗效评价及预后评价[J]. 现代消化及介入诊疗, 2023, 28(8): 936-941.
[3] 沙聪, 张一心, 袁爱军, 等. 胆管结石应用腹腔镜联合胆道镜取石术及利胆排石颗粒治疗的远期效果分析[J]. 中国实用医药, 2023, 18(24): 100-103.
[4] 古乾权, 陈杰, 邓开. 双镜联合治疗胆囊结石合并肝外胆管结石患者疗效及安全性分析[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2023, 26(6): 919-922.
[5] 朱建冬, 丁志军, 陶宁娟. LC与ERCP联合用于胆囊结石合并肝外胆管结石的有效性及安全性分析[J]. 中外医疗, 2023, 42(34): 72-77.
[6] 陈智明, 刘学武. LC与ERCP联合用于胆囊结石合并肝外胆管结石患者的临床价值[J]. 检验医学与临床, 2023, 20(20): 3061-3064.
[7] Baiu, I. and Hawn, M.T. (2018) Choledocholithiasis. JAMA, 320, Article 1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Yao, D., Dong, Q., Tian, Y., Dai, C. and Wu, S. (2018) Lipopolysaccharide Stimulates Endogenous β-Glucuronidase via PKC/NF-κB/c-Myc Signaling Cascade: A Possible Factor in Hepatolithiasis Formation. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, 444, 93-102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Lesmana, C.R.A., Paramitha, M.S. and Lesmana, L.A. (2021) Innovation of Endoscopic Management in Difficult Common Bile Duct Stone in the Era of Laparoscopic Surgery. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 13, 198-209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] 胡光明, 周涛, 肖杰, 等. 腹腔镜下胆囊切除术联合腹腔镜下胆总管探查术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者疗效研究[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2024, 27(1): 129-132.
[11] 刘赟, 贾会文. 双镜联合胆管切开取石留置T管与一期缝合治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的效果比较[J]. 医药论坛杂志, 2023, 44(22): 72-75+79.
[12] 李桢民, 张强, 李临川, 等. 机器人辅助胃切除术的研究进展及相关讨论[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2023, 28(9): 712-715.
[13] 胡捷, 周俭, 黄沛然, 等. 腹腔镜微创技术在肝切除中的应用现状与展望[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2022, 49(1): 12-17.
[14] 张璐, 王经琳, 任昊桢, 等. 机器人辅助肝切除术临床应用进展[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(6): 375-378.
[15] 付海啸, 李腾腾, 张轩, 等. 第4代达芬奇机器人手术系统在新辅助化疗后中低位直肠癌病人中的临床应用[J]. 腹部外科, 2023, 36(6): 457-462.
[16] Minamimura, K., Aoki, Y., Kaneya, Y., Matsumoto, S., Arai, H., Kakinuma, D., et al. (2024) Current Status of Robotic Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery. Journal of Nippon Medical School, 91, 10-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] 陈燕凌, 蔡欣然, 陈江枝, 等. 达芬奇机器人手术系统在肝切除手术中的应用[J]. 机器人外科学杂志(中英文), 2021, 2(2): 133-142.
[18] Kim, Y.G., Lee, J.H., Shim, J.W., Rhee, W., Kim, B.S., Yoon, D., et al. (2024) A Multimodal Virtual Vision Platform as a Next-Generation Vision System for a Surgical Robot. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 62, 1535-1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] 中华医学会外科学分会胆道外科学组. 中国医师协会外科医师分会胆道外科医师委员会胆道镜在肝胆管结石病诊断与治疗中的应用专家共识(2019版) [J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2019, 18(7): 611-615.
[20] Seon, K.E., Lee, Y.J., Lee, J., Nam, E.J., Kim, S., Kim, Y.T., et al. (2023) Initial Experience with the Da Vinci SP Robot-Assisted Surgical Staging of Endometrial Cancer: A Retrospective Comparison with Conventional Laparotomy. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 17, 2889-2898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] 任昊桢, 汤宁, 王帅, 等. 机器人肝切除术与腹腔镜肝切除术治疗结直肠癌肝转移的对比研究[J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志, 2021, 33(2): 70-74.
[22] 周瑜, 王小雨, 徐黎, 等. 全身麻醉下达芬奇机器人手术在老年腹部手术中应用观察[J]. 现代生物医学进展, 2022, 22(2): 254-258.
[23] Kolehmainen, C.S.J., Ukkonen, M.T., Tomminen, T., Helavirta, I.M., Laukkarinen, J.M., Hyöty, M., et al. (2023) Short Learning Curve in Transition from Laparoscopic to Robotic-Assisted Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Prospective Study from a Finnish Tertiary Referral Centre. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 17, 2361-2367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Gamal, A., Moschovas, M.C., Jaber, A.R., Saikali, S., Perera, R., Headley, C., et al. (2024) Clinical Applications of Robotic Surgery Platforms: A Comprehensive Review. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 18, Article No. 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] 姜卉, 蒋钰. 达芬奇机器人运营效益分析——以××三甲医院为例[J]. 中国农业会计, 2023, 33(15): 107-109.