游戏化阶梯教学法在少儿体育跳绳训练中的实践与成效
The Practice and Effectiveness of a Gamified Stepped Teaching Method in Children’s Rope Skipping Training
摘要: 本文是研究探索游戏化阶梯教学法在少儿体育跳绳训练中的创新实践与成效，以解决传统教学枯燥、参与度低、效果难量化等问题。该教学法融合游戏化元素与阶梯式策略，基于构建主义等理论构建教学框架，通过分解技能为阶梯任务、融入激励机制，经实践改善解决了任务匹配偏差问题。研究选取淮北市小学四年级学生，随机分为实验组(游戏化阶梯教学法)与对照组(传统教学法)经12周实验发现，实验组在跳绳速度、动作规范性等技能指标及参与度、自主训练意愿等方面均显著优于对照组，性质结果也印证其对儿童自主练习等方面的积极作用。研究提出实践建议，指出该教学法为少儿体育教学改革提供模式，未来可扩大样本、延长周期等以推动其应用，同时提及样本地域和周期局限为后续研究提供方向。
Abstract: This study explores the innovative practice and effectiveness of the gamified stepped teaching method in children’s sports rope skipping training, aiming to solve problems such as the dullness of traditional teaching, low participation, and difficulty in quantifying results. This teaching method integrates gamified elements with stepped strategies, constructs a teaching framework based on theories such as constructivism, decomposes skills into stepped tasks, incorporates incentive mechanisms, and solves the problem of task matching deviation through practical optimization. The study selected fourth-grade students from a public primary school in a certain city, randomly divided them into an experimental group (using the gamified stepped teaching method) and a control group (using the traditional teaching method). After a 12-week experiment, it was found that the experimental group was significantly better than the control group in terms of skill indicators such as rope skipping speed and movement standardization, as well as participation and willingness to train independently. Qualitative results also confirmed their positive role in children’s independent practice and other aspects. The study puts forward practical suggestions, pointing out that this teaching method provides a paradigm for the reform of children’s physical education teaching. In the future, the sample size can be expanded, and the experiment cycle can be extended to promote its application. At the same time, it mentions the limitations of sample region and cycle, providing directions for subsequent research.
文章引用：王叶欣, 陈海燕, 苗文浩. 游戏化阶梯教学法在少儿体育跳绳训练中的实践与成效[J]. 体育科学进展, 2025, 13(5): 649-657. https://doi.org/10.12677/aps.2025.135089

参考文献

[1] Prensky, M. (2009) Digital Game-Based Learning. Paragon House.
[2] Sousa, C., et al. (2021) The Impact of Gamification in Football Teaching on Students’ Autonomous Training Motivation. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 20, 456-465.
[3] 王颖. 游戏化教学在小学篮球教学中的应用研究[J]. 体育学刊, 2020, 27(5): 112-118.
[4] 李静, 张卫. 我国中小学体育游戏化教学的研究热点与趋势分析[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2022, 48(1): 124-130.
[5] Hamari, J., Shernoff, D.J., Rowe, E., Coller, B., Asbell-Clarke, J. and Edwards, T. (2016) Challenging Games Help Students Learn: An Empirical Study on Engagement, Flow and Immersion in Game-Based Learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 170-179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[6] 义务教育体育与健康课程标准(2022年版) [M]. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2022.
[7] 张一民, 等. 中国儿童青少年体育健身指数评估报告[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2018.
[8] Tomporowski, P.D., McCullick, B., Pendleton, D.M. and Pesce, C. (2015) Exercise and Children’s Cognition: The Role of Exercise Characteristics and a Place for Metacognition. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 4, 47-55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[9] 于素梅. 中国学生体育学科核心素养框架体系建构研究[J]. 体育科学, 2019, 39(5): 3-12.
[10] Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R. and Nacke, L. (2011) From Game Design Elements to Gamefulness: Defining “Gamification”. Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments, Tampere, 28-30 September 2011, 9-15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[11] 毛振明. 体育教学论[M]. 第3版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2017.
[12] 董文梅, 毛振明. 对运动技能进行分类的新视角及“运动技能会能度”的提出[J]. 广州体育学院学报, 2008, 28(4): 5-9.
[13] 汪晓赞, 等. 中国青少年体育健康评估体系的构建与验证[J]. 上海体育学院学报, 2015, 39(1): 25-31.
[14] Ryan, R.M. and Deci, E.L. (2017) Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness. Guilford Publications.
[15] Fosnot, C.T. (2005) Constructivism: Theory, Perspectives, and Practice. Teachers College Press.
[16] Anderson, J.R. (2015) Cognitive Skills and Their Acquisition. Psychology Press.
[17] 张建. 阶梯式教学法在小学跳远教学中的实验研究[J]. 体育教学, 2021, 41(10): 60-62.
[18] Bandura, A. (2001) Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Schunk, D.H. and DiBenedetto, M.K. (2020) Motivation and Social Cognitive Theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, Article ID: 101832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[20] Seaborn, K. and Fels, D.I. (2015) Gamification in Theory and Action: A Survey. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 74, 14-31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[21] Deci, E.L. and Ryan, R.M. (2000) The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[22] Rigby, S. and Ryan, R.M. (2019) Glued to Games: How Video Games Draw Us in and Hold Us Spellbound. Praeger.
[23] Piaget, J. (1970) Genetic Epistemology. Columbia University Press.
[24] 陈佑清. 建构主义学习理论及其在教学中的应用[J]. 教育研究与实验, 2011(5): 10-15.
[25] 姚蕾. 体育教学中的建构主义: 理念与应用[J]. 北京体育大学学报, 2014, 37(8): 95-100.
[26] 季浏. 中国健康体育课程模式的思考与构建[J]. 北京体育大学学报, 2018, 41(5): 72-80.
[27] 国家体育总局. “十四五”体育发展规划[R]. 2021.
[28] Schmidt, R.A. and Lee, T.D. (2019) Motor Learning and Performance: From Principles to Application. Human Kinetics.
[29] McGonigal, J. (2011) Reality Is Broken: Why Games Make Us Better and How They Can Change the World. Penguin Press.
[30] Zichermann, G. and Cunningham, C. (2011) Gamification by Design: Implementing Game Mechanics in Web and Mobile Apps. O’Reilly Media.
[31] Malamed, C. (2012) Book Review: ‘The Gamification of Learning and Instruction: Game-Based Methods and Strategies for Training and Education’ by Karl Kapp. eLearn, 2012, Article ID: 2211316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[32] Nicholson, S. (2014) A RECIPE for Meaningful Gamification. In: Reiners, T. and Wood, L., Eds., Gamification in Education and Business, Springer, 1-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[33] Landers, R.N., Auer, E.M., Collmus, A.B. and Armstrong, M.B. (2018) Gamification Science, Its History and Future: Definitions and a Research Agenda. Simulation & Gaming, 49, 315-337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]