直播虚假宣传下实质性披露机制的引入——以新《反不正当竞争法》的修改为视角
The Introduction of Substantive Disclosure Systems under Live Broadcast False Advertising—A Perspective on the Revision of the New “Anti-Unfair Competition Law”
摘要: 随着电子商务的发展,网络直播带货成为主流营销模式。然而,直播带货领域虚假宣传行为频发,既侵犯了消费者的知情权与公平交易权,又破坏了市场公平竞争秩序。针对直播场景中四类典型虚假宣传行为,即对产品质量或服务品质、销售状况和评价、对竞争对手的产品或服务以及主播身份和立场的虚假宣传,新《反不正当竞争法》不仅强化了预防导向的事前规制,而且细化了与直播场景适配的具体规则,为前三类虚假宣传行为的规制提供了明确法律依据。但是,新法并未将“对身份立场的隐瞒”纳入法律规制范畴,在此背景下,引入“实质性关联信息披露机制”成为填补“身份立场隐瞒”规制空缺的关键。同时,该机制可以更好地明确电商经营者、主播、平台三方的义务,维护公平竞争的市场秩序,为直播电商行业高质量发展保驾护航。
Abstract: With the development of e-commerce, online live streaming has become the mainstream marketing model. However, false propaganda in the field of live streaming is frequent, which not only infringes on consumers’ right to know and fair trade, but also undermines the order of fair competition in the market. In response to the four types of typical false publicity behaviors in live broadcast scenarios, namely false publicity of product quality or service quality, sales status and evaluation, competitors’ products or services, and the identity and position of anchors, the new Anti-Unfair Competition Law not only strengthens prevention-oriented prior regulation, but also refines the specific rules for adaptation to live broadcast scenarios, providing a clear legal basis for the regulation of the first three types of false publicity behaviors. However, the new law does not include “concealment of identity position” in the scope of legal regulation, and in this context, the introduction of a “substantive related information disclosure mechanism” has become the key to filling the gap in the regulation of “concealment of identity position”. At the same time, this mechanism can better clarify the obligations of e-commerce operators, anchors and platforms, maintain the market order of fair competition, and escort the high-quality development of the live broadcast e-commerce industry.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
网经社电子商务研究中心. 2025年(上)中国电子商务用户体验与投诉数据报告[EB/OL]. http://www.100ec.cn/detail--6650825.html, 2025-07-16.
|
|
[2]
|
北京阳光消费大数据研究院. 直播带货消费维权舆情分析报告(2024) [EB/OL]. http://www.sun-c.cn/rdgz/202503/t20250314_22263.html, 2025-03-14.
|
|
[3]
|
姚辉, 阙梓冰. 电商平台中的自治与法治——兼议平台治理中的司法态度[J]. 求是学刊, 2020, 47(4): 90-102+2.
|
|
[4]
|
顺德市场监管. 假皮也能“变”真皮?乐从两家家具企业因虚假宣传被罚! [EB/OL]. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/1LqK2OULfXvFTb5005NdQA, 2024-06-21.
|
|
[5]
|
苏海雨. 网络直播带货的法律规制[J]. 中国流通经济, 2021, 35(1): 97-104.
|
|
[6]
|
张俊发, 马陈龙. 数字经济视域下网络主播带货行为的法律规制[J]. 南海法学, 2024, 8(1): 113-124.
|
|
[7]
|
刘雅婷, 李楠. 直播电商虚假宣传的法律规制[J]. 知识产权, 2021, 31(5): 68-82.
|
|
[8]
|
陈璟. “直播带货”的法治化监管路径探索[J]. 人民论坛·学术前沿, 2020(17): 124-127.
|
|
[9]
|
丁国峰, 蒋淼. 我国网络直播带货虚假宣传的法律规制——兼评《禁止网络不正当竞争行为规定(公开征求意见稿)》[J]. 中国流通经济, 2022, 36(8): 29-39.
|
|
[10]
|
王拓. 直播营销模式变化下“实质性关联”信息披露之提倡——以消费者知情权为视角[J]. 经济师, 2023(5): 55-56.
|
|
[11]
|
Federal Trade Commission (2019) Disclosures 101 for Social Media Influencers. https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/resources/disclosures-101-social-media-influencers
|
|
[12]
|
张玉洁, 钟彬. 网络直播营销的法律规制研究[J]. 重庆科技学院学报(社会科学版), 2023(2): 57-63.
|
|
[13]
|
李梦琳. 论网络直播平台的监管机制——以看门人理论的新发展为视角[J]. 行政法学研究, 2019(4): 123-132.
|