文旅融合背景下传统手工艺助力乡村振兴的内在逻辑与实践路径——以丹寨县卡拉村为例
The Internal Logic and Practical Pathways of Traditional Handicrafts in Promoting Rural Revitalization under the Context of Cultural and Tourism Integration—Taking Kara Village in Danzhai County as an Example
摘要: 2024年中央一号文件强调乡村传统文化与非遗保护开发及文旅深度融合对乡村振兴的重要性。传统手工艺作为乡村文化的一部分,在文旅融合与乡村振兴中具有重要意义。本研究以丹寨县卡拉村为例,深入剖析传统手工艺在文旅融合背景下助力乡村振兴的内在逻辑与实践路径。卡拉村传统手工艺资源丰富,在文旅融合发展实践中,旅游基础设施不断完善,文化旅游产品开发成效显著。其内在逻辑包括助力产业融合,拉动经济增长,拓展文旅市场空间;承载文化传承,培育文化自信;培养和吸引人才。实践路径涵盖政策扶持与资金投入、产业创新与升级、人才培养与引进、品牌塑造与营销推广等方面。卡拉村经验为其他地区提供了借鉴,同时也面临技术革新、市场拓展、人才培养引进和文化传承创新等方面的挑战与机遇。
Abstract: The 2024 Central Document No. 1 emphasizes the importance of rural traditional culture, intangible cultural heritage protection and development, and the deep integration of culture and tourism for rural revitalization. As an integral part of rural culture, traditional ethnic handicrafts play a significant role in the integration of culture, tourism, and rural revitalization. This study takes Kara Village in Danzhai county as a case study to deeply analyze the intrinsic logic and practical pathways of ethnic traditional handicrafts in promoting rural revitalization under the backdrop of cultural and tourism integration. Kala Village is rich in ethnic traditional handicraft resources. In the practice of cultural and tourism integration development, tourism infrastructure has been continuously improved, and the development of cultural tourism products has achieved significant results. Its intrinsic logic includes promoting industrial integration, driving economic growth, and expanding the market space for cultural and tourism industries; carrying forward cultural heritage and fostering cultural confidence; and cultivating and attracting talent. The practical pathways encompass policy support and financial investment, industrial innovation and upgrading, talent cultivation and recruitment, brand building, and marketing promotion. The experience of Kara Village provides valuable insights for other regions, while also presenting challenges and opportunities in areas such as technological innovation, market expansion, talent cultivation and recruitment, and cultural inheritance and innovation.
文章引用:李若璠. 文旅融合背景下传统手工艺助力乡村振兴的内在逻辑与实践路径——以丹寨县卡拉村为例[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2025, 14(10): 85-91. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2025.1410872

参考文献

[1] 中共中央国务院关于学习运用“千村示范、万村整治”工程经验有力有效推进乡村全面振兴的意见[EB/OL].
https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/2024/issue_11186/202402/content_6934551.html, 2024-02-03.
[2] 马晓龙, 赵青华. 文旅融合赋能乡村振兴的内在逻辑[J]. 旅游学刊, 2024, 39(11): 1-3.
[3] 李师娜, 刘贤明. 文旅融合赋能乡村振兴的广义路径[J]. 旅游学刊, 2024, 39(11): 3-6.
[4] 李白, 李亚男, 黄莉. 文旅融合赋能乡村振兴的人才支撑[J]. 旅游学刊, 2024, 39(11): 9-11.
[5] 徐杰, 魏敏, 魏海湘. 文旅融合助推乡村振兴的演化博弈[J]. 旅游学刊, 2024, 39(11): 7-9.
[6] 张圆刚. 数字文旅时代乡村旅游地劳动力返乡: 新特点、新角色、新挑战[J]. 旅游学刊, 2024, 39(11): 14-15.
[7] 杨小冬. 文旅融合赋能乡村振兴的机制与路径[J]. 人民论坛, 2022(24): 81-83.
[8] 傅才武, 程玉梅. 文旅融合在乡村振兴中的作用机制与政策路径: 一个宏观框架[J]. 华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2021, 60(6): 69-77.
[9] 何璇. 文旅融合与乡村振兴衔接问题研究[J]. 中国行政管理, 2021(5): 155-157.
[10] 周禺. 乡村振兴与传统手工艺的创造性转化——以黄梅挑花为例[J/OL]. 中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 1-7. 2024-08-09. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 陈广明, 莫力丽. 乡村振兴战略下“一县一品”案例研究[J]. 农业经济, 2024(11): 132-134.
[12] 肖虹. 乡村文化振兴语境下贫困地区传统工艺品牌营造路径研究——以湘西传统印染工艺为例[J]. 广西民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2020, 42(5): 52-58.
[13] 刘银妹, 童珍, 李青蓓. 从手工艺到非遗: 民族村寨农产品品牌的价值重构与创新发展——以广西都安瑶族自治县地苏镇丹阳村藤编产业为例[J]. 广西民族研究, 2023(2): 180-188.
[14] 邢瑞娟, 王文东. 乡村振兴战略下贵州少数民族民间工艺传承与发展的对策[J]. 贵州民族研究, 2021, 42(3): 124-132.
[15] 兰军师, 朱新武, 高鹏飞. 乡村振兴战略背景下民族地区乡村文化传承发展研究[J]. 贵州民族研究, 2024, 45(2): 96-99.
[16] 贵州省农业农村厅. 黔东南州丹寨县: 传承乡村文脉 赋能乡村善治持续发展[EB/OL].
https://nynct.guizhou.gov.cn/ztzl/nycytp/202410/t20241022_85967986.html, 2024-10-22.
[17] 杨矞, 范周. 文旅融合推动乡村文化振兴的作用机理和实施路径[J]. 出版广角, 2021(19): 37-40.
[18] 贵州新闻联播. 探寻贵州乡愁印记|卡拉村非遗技艺背后的文脉传承[CP/OL].
https://www.gzstv.com/v/71b034d479304d25823700dc0a3da064, 2024-09-19.
[19] 吴少伟, 郭星星. 文化遗产赋能乡村振兴的内在逻辑与实践路径[J]. 原生态民族文化学刊, 2024, 16(6): 125-133+156.
[20] 徐珍, 王宝升. 增强文化自信的实践之维——以非遗剪纸艺术为例[J]. 湖南社会科学, 2021(1): 153-158.
[21] 崔凤军, 徐宁宁. 旅游促进地方文化传承创新的实践探索与理论思考[J]. 旅游学刊, 2024, 39(3): 15-16.
[22] 何阳. “文旅+”背景下乡村旅游新业态[J]. 农业经济, 2024(10): 64-66.